Investigation of the effects of endovenous thermocoagulation methods on perivenous and venous tissue in an ex-vivo animal model

Evans CJ, Fowkes FG, Ruckley CV, Lee AJ (1999) Prevalence of varicose veins and chronic venous insufficiency in men and women in the general population: Edinburgh vein study. J Epidemiol Community Health 53:149–153. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.53.3.149

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rabe E, Guex JJ, Puskas A, Scuderi A, Fernandez Quesada F (2012) Epidemiology of chronic venous disorders in geographically diverse populations: results from the vein consult program. Int Angiol 31:105–115

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gloviczki P, Comerota AJ, Dalsing MC, Eklof B, Gillespie DL, Moneta GL, Wakefield TW (2011) The care of patients with varicose veins and associated chronic venous diseases: clinical practice guidelines of the society for vascular surgery and the American venous forum. J Vasc Surg 53(Suppl):2S–48S. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2011.01.079

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wittens C, Davies AH, Bækgaard N, Broholm R, Cavezzi A, Chastanet S (2015) European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) Editor’s choice - Management of Chronic Venous Disease: Clinical Practice Guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 49:678–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.02.007

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chang CJ, Chua JJ (2002) Endovenous laser photocoagulation (EVLP) for varicose veins. Lasers Surg Med 31(4):257–262. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.10103

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lee JS, Hsiao YC, Chang CJ (2019) Endovenous photocoagulation using a diode laser for complicated varicose veins related to stasis ulcers. Ann Plast Surg 82(1):S103–S107. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000001726

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yu DY, Chen HC, Chang SY, Hsiao YC, Chang CJ (2013) Comparing the effectiveness of 1064 vs. 810 nm wavelength endovascular laser for chronic venous insufficiency (varicose veins). Laser Ther 22(4):247–253. https://doi.org/10.5978/islsm.13-OR-19

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Morrison N, Gibson K, McEnroe S, Goldman M, King T, Weiss R (2015) Randomized trial comparing cyanoacrylate embolization and radiofrequency ablation for incompetent great saphenous veins (VeClose). J Vasc Surg 61:985–994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2014.11.071

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Liu X, Jia X, Guo W, Li H, Liu J (2011) Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy of the great saphenous vein with sapheno-femoral ligation compared to standard stripping: a prospective clinical study. Int Angiol 30:321–326

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Farah MH, Nayfeh T, Urtecho M, Hasan R, Mahmood S, King M (2022) A systematic review supporting the Society for Vascular Surgery, the American Venous Forum, and the American Vein and Lymphatic Society guidelines on the management of varicose veins. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 10:1155–1171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2021.12.002

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Armogida NG, Valletta A, Calabria E, Canfora F, Rengo C, Spagnuolo G (2023) The photocoagulation-assisted aesthetic treatment of phlebectasias of the lips using a Nd:YAG laser with a low energy level. J Clin Med 12(6):2292. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062292

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Armogida NG, Esposito L, Calabria E, Cernera M, Spagnuolo G, Iaculli F (2023) Dye laser to treat an arteriovenous malformation of the tongue: 40-month follow-up. Case Rep Dent 2023:5583749. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/5583749

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Whing J, Nandhra S, Nesbitt C, Tang TY, Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group (2021) Interventions for great saphenous vein incompetence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005624.pub3

Almeida JI, Kaufman J, Göckeritz O, Murray SP, Chopra P, Vasquez M (2009) Radiofrequency endovenous closurefast versus laser ablation for the treatment of great saphenous reflux: a multicenter, single-blinded, randomized study (RECOVERY study). J Vasc Interv Radiol 20:752–759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2009.02.017

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vuylsteke ME, Martinelli T, Van Dorpe J, De Bo TH, Dompe G (2011) Endovenous laser ablation: the role of intraluminal blood. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 42:120–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.03.005

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Teter KA, Kabnick LS, Sadek M (2020) Endovenous laser ablation: a comprehensive review. Phlebology 35:656–662. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268355520903962

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vuylsteke M, De Bo TH, Dompe G, Broos P, Bellemans J, Lambeir A (2011) Endovenous laser treatment: is there a clinical difference between using a 1500 Nm and a 980 Nm diode laser? A multicenter randomised clinical trial. Int Angiol 30:327–334

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gibson K, Elias S, Adelman M, Lavery L, Vincent J, Elias E (2020) A prospective safety and effectiveness study using endovenous laser ablation with a 400-µm optical fiber for the treatment of pathologic perforator veins in patients with advanced venous disease (SeCure trial). J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 8:805–813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.02.012

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Doganci S, Demirkilic U (2010) Comparison of 980 Nm laser and bare-tip fibre with 1470 Nm laser and radial fibre in the treatment of great saphenous vein varicosities: a prospective randomised clinical trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 40:254–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.03.011

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schmedt CG, Sroka R, Steckmeier S, Steckmeier B, Steinbrich A (2006) Investigation on radiofrequency and laser (980 nm) effects after endoluminal treatment of saphenous vein insufficiency in an ex-vivo model. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 32:318–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.03.014

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hirokawa M, Kurihara N (2014) Comparison of bare-tip and radial fiber in endovenous laser ablation with 1470 nm diode laser. Ann Vasc Dis 7(3):239–245. https://doi.org/10.3400/avd.oa.14-00081

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kabnick LS, Sadek M (2016) Fiber type as compared to wavelength may contribute more to improving postoperative recovery following endovenous laser ablation. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 4(3):286–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2015.12.004

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zaki MM, Tawfick SE, Gohar KS (2023) Comparing the effects of radial and jacketed laser tip fibers on outcome of endovenous laser ablation of lower limb truncal venous reflux. Ann Vasc Surg 93:243–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2023.01.045

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hartmann K, Gholam P, Dietrich C, Mezghani D, Becker D, Reich-Schupke S (2022) Efficacy and safety of endovenous laser ablation with the 1470 Nm diode laser using a novel optical probe. Int J Med Sci 19:695–700. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.71568

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

van den Bos RR, Kockaert MA, Neumann HA, Nijsten T (2008) Technical review of endovenous laser therapy for varicose veins. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 35:88–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2007.07.023

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hirokawa M, Ogawa T, Sugawara H, Kodama A, Tokuda K, Yamada N (2015) Comparison of 1470 Nm laser and radial 2ring fiber with 980 Nm laser and bare-tip fiber in endovenous laser ablation of saphenous varicose veins: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, non-blind study. Ann Vasc Dis 8:282–289. https://doi.org/10.3400/avd.oa.14-00102

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Fan CM, Rox-Anderson R (2008) Endovenous laser ablation: mechanism of action. Phlebology 23:206–213. https://doi.org/10.1258/phleb.2008.008s21

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Comments (0)

No login
gif