Lukasiewicz S, Czeczelewski M, Forma A, Baj J, Sitarz R, Stanislawek A. Breast cancer-epidemiology, risk factors, classification, prognostic markers, and current treatment strategies-an updated review. Cancers. 2021;13(17):4287. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13174287. (Basel).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023;73(1):17–48.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Haber G, Ahmed NU, Pekovic V. Family history of cancer and its association with breast cancer risk perception and repeat mammography. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(12):2322–9.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer. Familial breast cancer: collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 52 epidemiological studies including 58,209 women with breast cancer and 101,986 women without the disease. Lancet. 2001;358(9291):1389–99.

Article  Google Scholar 

Giaquinto AN, Sung H, Miller KD, Kramer JL, Newman LA, Minihan A, et al. Breast Cancer Statistics, 2022. CA A Cancer J Clin. 2022;72(6):524–41.

Article  Google Scholar 

Anttila A, Koskela J, Hakama M. Programme sensitivity and effectiveness of mammography service screening in Helsinki, Finland. J Med Screen. 2002;9(4):153–8.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Njor S, Nystrom L, Moss S, Paci E, Broeders M, Segnan N, et al. Breast cancer mortality in mammographic screening in Europe: a review of incidence-based mortality studies. J Med Screen. 2012;19(Suppl 1):33–41.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hathaway C, Paetsch P, Li Y, Wu J, Asgarian S, Parker A, et al. Association of breast cancer screening behaviors with stage at breast cancer diagnosis and potential for additive multi-cancer detection via liquid biopsy screening: a claims-based study. Front Oncol. 2021;15(11):688455.

Article  Google Scholar 

Arnold M, Morgan E, Rumgay H, Mafra A, Singh D, Laversanne M, et al. Current and future burden of breast cancer: global statistics for 2020 and 2040. Breast. 2022;01(66):15–23.

Article  Google Scholar 

Duffy SW, Tabar L, Yen AM, Dean PB, Smith RA, Jonsson H, et al. Mammography screening reduces rates of advanced and fatal breast cancers: results in 549,091 women. Cancer. 2020;126(13):2971–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Champaign JL, Cederbom GJ. Advances in breast cancer detection with screening mammography. Ochsner J. 2000;2(1):33–5.

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

•• Lamb LR, Mohallem Fonseca M, Verma R, Seely JM. Missed breast cancer: effects of subconscious bias and lesion characteristics. Radiographics. 2020;40(4):941–60. (The article explores the impact of subconscious bias and lesion characteristics on the missed detection of breast cancer. It highlights how biases in medical professionals, coupled with certain characteristics of breast lesions, contribute to diagnostic errors in detecting breast cancer.)

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rodziewicz TL, Houseman B, Hipskind JE. Medical error reduction and prevention. StatPearls Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing LLC; 2023.

Google Scholar 

Monticciolo DL, Newell MS, Moy L, Lee CS, Destounis SV. Breast cancer screening for women at higher-than-average risk: updated recommendations from the ACR. J Am Coll Radiol. 2023;20(9):902–14.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Estrada SS. Review of the New American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Cancer Screening for women at average risk. J Adv Pract Oncol. 2016;7(5):563–6.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wu JC, Hakama M, Anttila A, Yen AM, Malila N, Sarkeala T, et al. Estimation of natural history parameters of breast cancer based on non-randomized organized screening data: subsidiary analysis of effects of inter-screening interval, sensitivity, and attendance rate on reduction of advanced cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;122(2):553–66.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tsapatsaris A, Babagbemi K, Reichman MB. Barriers to breast cancer screening are worsened amidst COVID-19 pandemic: a review. Clin Imaging. 2022;01(82):224–7.

Article  Google Scholar 

• Mootz A, Arjmandi F, Dogan BE, Evans WP. Health care disparities in breast cancer: the economics of access to screening, diagnosis, and treatment. J Breast Imaging. 2020;2(6):524–9. (This article examines healthcare disparities in breast cancer, focusing on the economic factors that affect access to screening, diagnosis, and treatment. It delves into the challenges and inequalities faced by different socioeconomic groups in accessing crucial aspects of breast cancer care.)

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ikeda DM, Birdwell RL, O’Shaughnessy KF, Brenner RJ, Sickles EA. Analysis of 172 subtle findings on prior normal mammograms in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening. Radiology. 2003;226(2):494–503.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Giess CS, Frost EP, Birdwell RL. Difficulties and errors in diagnosis of breast neoplasms. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2012;33(4):288–99.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Majid AS, de Paredes ES, Doherty RD, Sharma NR, Salvador X. Missed breast carcinoma: pitfalls and pearls. Radiographics. 2003;23(4):881–95.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Busby LP, Courtier JL, Glastonbury CM. Bias in radiology: the how and why of misses and misinterpretations. Radiographics. 2018;38(1):236–47.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Elmore JG, Jackson SL, Abraham L, Miglioretti DL, Carney PA, Geller BM, et al. Variability in interpretive performance at screening mammography and radiologists’ characteristics associated with accuracy. Radiology. 2009;253(3):641–51.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bender CE, Bansal S, Wolfman D, Parikh JR. 2019 ACR Commission on Human Resources Workforce Survey. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020;17(5):673–5.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Linver MN, Paster SB, Rosenberg RD, Key CR, Stidley CA, King WV. Improvement in mammography interpretation skills in a community radiology practice after dedicated teaching courses: 2-year medical audit of 38,633 cases. Radiology. 1992;184(1):39–43.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Geller BM, Bogart A, Carney PA, Sickles EA, Smith R, Monsees B, et al. Educational interventions to improve screening mammography interpretation: a randomized controlled trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202(6):586.

Article  Google Scholar 

Brennan PC, McEntee M, Evanoff M, Phillips P, O’Connor WT, Manning DJ. Ambient lighting: effect of illumination on soft-copy viewing of radiographs of the wrist. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188(2):177.

Article  Google Scholar 

Norweck JT, Seibert JA, Andriole KP, Clunie DA, Curran BH, Flynn MJ, et al. ACR-AAPM-SIIM technical standard for electronic practice of medical imaging. J Digit Imaging. 2013;26(1):38–52.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ekpo EU, Alakhras M, Brennan P. Errors in mammography cannot be solved through technology alone. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018;19(2):291–301.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C, Tornberg S, Holland R, von Karsa L. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth edition--summary document. Ann Oncol. 2008;19(4):614–22.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pal S, Ikeda DM, Jesinger RA, Mickelsen LJ, Chen CA, Larson DB. Improving performance of mammographic breast positioning in an academic radiology practice. Am J Roentgenol. 2018;210(4):807–15.

Article  Google Scholar 

Popli MB, Teotia R, Narang M, Krishna H. Breast positioning during mammography: mistakes to be avoided. Breast Cancer. 2014;30(8):119–24 (Auckl).

Google Scholar 

Sweeney RI, Lewis SJ, Hogg P, McEntee MF. A review of mammographic positioning image quality criteria for the craniocaudal projection. Br J Radiol. 2018;91(1082):20170611.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sharpe REJ, Venkataraman S, Phillips J, Dialani V, Fein-Zachary VJ, Prakash S, et al. Increased cancer detection rate and variations in the recall rate resulting from implementation of 3D digital breast tomosynthesis into a population-based screening program. Radiology. 2016;280(3):981.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zuley ML, Guo B, Catullo VJ, Chough DM, Kelly AE, Lu AH, et al. Comparison of two-dimensional synthesized mammograms versus original digital mammograms alone and in combination with tomosynthesis images. Radiology. 2014;271(3):664–71.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jiang Y, Nishikawa RM, Schmidt RA, Toledano AY, Doi K. Potential of computer-aided diagnosis to reduce variability in radiologists’ interpretations of mammograms depicting microcalcifications. Radiology. 2001;220(3):787–94.

Article