Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Schmid C. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;30(4):CD004014.

Google Scholar 

Siddiqui NY, Grimes CL, Casiano ER, Abed HT, Jeppson PC, Olivera CK, et al. Mesh sacrocolpopexy compared with native tissue vaginal repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(1):44–55.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Campbell P, Cloney L, Jha S. Abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2016;71(7):435–42.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

De Gouveia De Sa M, Claydon LS, Whitlow B, Dolcet Artahona MA. Laparoscopic versus open sacrocolpopexy for treatment of prolapse of the apical segment of the vagina: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(1):3–17.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nosti PA, Umoh Andy U, Kane S, White DE, Harvie HS, Lowenstein L, et al. Outcomes of abdominal and minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: a retrospective cohort study. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2014;20(1):33–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yang J, He Y, Zhang X, Wang Z, Zuo X, Gao L, et al. Robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Transl Med. 2021;9(6):449.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Mozon AO, Kim JH, Lee SR. Robotic sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2024;67(2):212–7.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Chang CL, Chen CH, Chang SJ. Comparing the outcomes and effectiveness of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;33(2):297–308.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Simoncini T, Panattoni A, Aktas M, Ampe J, Betschart C, Bloemendaal ALA, et al. Robot-assisted pelvic floor reconstructive surgery: an international Delphi study of expert users. Surg Endosc. 2023;37(7):5215–25.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bordeianou LG, Anger JT, Boutros M, Birnbaum E, Carmichael JC, Connell KA, et al. Measuring pelvic floor disorder symptoms using patient-reported instruments: Proceedings of the Consensus Meeting of the Pelvic Floor Consortium of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, the International Continence Society, the American Urogynecologic Society, and the Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine and Urogenital Reconstruction. Urogynecology. 2020;26(1):1.

Google Scholar 

Van Zanten F, Schraffordt Koops SE, O’Sullivan OE, Lenters E, Broeders I, O’Reilly BA. Robot-assisted surgery for the management of apical prolapse: a bi-centre prospective cohort study. BJOG. 2019;126(8):1065–73.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Advincula AP, Truong MD. ExCITE: Minimally invasive tissue extraction made simple with simulation. OBG Manag. 2015;27(12):40–5.

Google Scholar 

Mitropoulos D, Artibani W, Graefen M, Remzi M, Rouprêt M, Truss M, et al. Reporting and grading of complications after urologic surgical procedures: an ad hoc EAU guidelines panel assessment and recommendations. Eur Urol. 2012;61(2):341–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yong PJ, Thurston J, Singh SS, Allaire C. Guideline no. 386—gynaecologic surgery for patients with obesity. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019;41(9):1356–70.e7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kissane LM, Calixte R, Grigorescu B, Finamore P, Vintzileos A. Impact of obesity on robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017;24(1):36–40.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wei JT, Nygaard I, Richter HE, Nager CW, Barber MD, Kenton K, et al. A midurethral sling to reduce incontinence after vaginal prolapse repair. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(25):2358–67.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, Maher C, Haya N, Crawford TJ, Brown J. Surgery for women with pelvic organ prolapse with or without stress urinary incontinence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;8(8):CD013108.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

De Gouveia De Sa M, Claydon LS, Whitlow B, Dolcet Artahona MA. Robotic versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of prolapse of the apical segment of the vagina: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(3):355–66.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tan-Kim J, Menefee SA, Luber KM, Nager CW, Lukacz ES. Robotic-assisted and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: comparing operative times, costs and outcomes. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2011;17(1):44–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pan K, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Wang Y, Xu H. A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016;132(3):284–91.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Deshpande HG, Madkar CS, Kiwalkar SR. Relationship of decubitus ulcer on cervix in pelvic organ prolapse with POP-Q staging. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2019;69(3):266–71.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ploumidis A, Spinoit AF, De Naeyer G, Schatteman P, Gan M, Ficarra V, et al. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: surgical technique and outcomes at a single high-volume institution. Eur Urol. 2014;65(1):138–45.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Teplitz C. The learning curve deskbook: a reference guide to theory, calculations, and applications. New York: Quorum; 1991.

Google Scholar 

Shugaba A, Lambert JE, Bampouras TM, Nuttall HE, Gaffney CJ, Subar DA. Should all minimal access surgery be robot-assisted? A systematic review into the musculoskeletal and cognitive demands of laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2022;26(7):1520–30.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar