How did exposure to Critical Access Hospitals change Medicare's effect on cancer survival?

Abstract

Upon turning 65, U.S. cancer patients experience the “Medicare Effect’ of better outcomes relative to patients nearly 65. Context likely mediates this effect, but so might differential access to care. With population-based cancer registry data, we construct a Difference-in-Discontinuities framework test if this “Medicare Effect” on cancer detection and survival varies in counties with and without a Critical Access Hospital (CAH), before and after CAH conversion. Consistent with prior literature, gaining Medicare was associated with reduced probability of distant stage diagnosis and improved two-year survival. Exposure to CAHs did not change Medicare’s effect on detection, but did increase Medicare’s effect on all-cause survival for males with prostate cancer (Est. = +0.019, se = 0.005), and females with lung (+0.046, se = 0.021) and colorectal cancer (Est. = +0.076, se = 0.026). Policies improving cancer survival remain warranted for both men and women with, and without Medicare.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any funding.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Data is sharing subject to third-party restrictions (NCI).

Comments (0)

No login
gif