Samuel DS, Duraisamy R, Kumar M. Cone-beam computed tomography and its applications in dentistry. Drug Invention Today. 2019;12(1).

Vasconcelos TV, Bechara BB, McMahan CA, Freitas DQ, Noujeim M. Evaluation of artifacts generated by zirconium implants in cone-beam computed tomography images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2017;123(2):265–72.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Akleyin E, Goncharuk-Khomyn M. Cone Beamed Computerized Dental Tomography in Dentistry. 2019.

Nikbin A, Kajan ZD, Taramsari M, Khosravifard N. Effect of object position in the field of view and application of a metal artifact reduction algorithm on the detection of vertical root fractures on cone-beam computed tomography scans: An in vitro study. Imaging Sci Dent. 2018;48(4):245–54.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Barros-Costa M, Barros-Candido JR, Sampaio-Oliveira M, Freitas DQ, Sverzut AT, Oliveira ML. Impact of the spatial orientation of the patient’s head, metal artifact reduction, and tube current on cone-beam computed tomography artifact expression adjacent to a dental implant: A laboratory study using a simulated surgical guide. Imaging Sci Dent. 2024;54:191.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Asnaashari M, Sadeghipour M, Bahrani Z, Valizadeh S, Moshfeghi M. The effect of changes in the angular position of implants on metal artifact reduction in cone-beam computed tomography images: a scoping review. Radiol Res Pract. 2023;2023(1):5539719.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral Radiology - E-Book: Principles and Interpretation: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2014.

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. bmj. 2021;372.

Munn Z, Moola S, Riitano D, Lisy K. The development of a critical appraisal tool for use in systematic reviews addressing questions of prevalence. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2014;3(3):123.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Vasconcelos TV, Nascimento EHL, Bechara BB, Freitas DQ, Noujeim M. Influence of Cone Beam Computed Tomography Settings on Implant Artifact Production: Zirconia and Titanium. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Implants. 2019;34(5):1114–20.

Article  Google Scholar 

Fontenele RC, Nascimento EH, Santaella GM, Freitas DQ. Does the metal artifact reduction algorithm activation mode influence the magnitude of artifacts in CBCT images? Imaging Sci Dent. 2020;50(1):23.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Mancini AXM, Santos MUC, Gaêta-Araujo H, Tirapelli C, Pauwels R, Oliveira-Santos C. Artefacts at different distances from titanium and zirconia implants in cone-beam computed tomography: effect of tube current and metal artefact reduction. Clin Oral Investigations. 2021;25(8):5087–94.

Article  Google Scholar 

Nascimento EHL, Fontenele RC, Santaella GM, Freitas DQ. Difference in the artefacts production and the performance of the metal artefact reduction (MAR) tool between the buccal and lingual cortical plates adjacent to zirconium dental implant. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2019;48(8):20190058.

Article  Google Scholar 

Parsa A, Ibrahim N, Hassan B, Syriopoulos K, Van Der Stelt P. Assessment of metal artefact reduction around dental titanium implants in cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2014;43(7):20140019.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Bechara B, Moore W, McMahan C, Noujeim M. Metal artefact reduction with cone beam CT: an in vitro study. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2012;41(3):248–53.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Martins LAC, Queiroz PM, Nejaim Y, Vasconcelos KdF, Groppo FC, Haiter-Neto F. Evaluation of metal artefacts for two CBCT devices with a new dental arch phantom. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2020;49(5):20190385.

Article  Google Scholar 

Rosado LdPL, Fagundes FB, Freitas DQ, Oliveira ML, Neves FS. Influence of the intracanal material and metal artifact reduction tool in the detection of the second mesiobuccal canal in cone-beam computed tomographic examinations. J Endod. 2020;46(8):1067–73.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sheikhi M, Gholami SAS, Ghazizadeh M. Accuracy of CBCT linear measurements to determine the height of alveolar crest to the mental foramen. Avicenna J Dental Res. 2021;13(1):1–5.

Article  Google Scholar 

Nascimento EHL, Gaêta-Araujo H, Fontenele RC, Oliveira-Santos N, Oliveira-Santos C, Freitas DQ. Do the number of basis images and metal artifact reduction affect the production of artifacts near and far from zirconium dental implants in CBCT? Clin Oral Invest. 2021;25:5281–91.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kuzu TE, Kiş HC. Effect of different cone beam computed tomography settings on artifact production in titanium and zirconia dental implants: An in vitro study. Dental Med Problems. 2024;61(2):233–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Omar G, Abdelsalam Z, Hamed W. Quantitative analysis of metallic artifacts caused by dental metallic restorations: comparison between four CBCT scanners. Future Dental J. 2016;2(1):15–21.

Article  Google Scholar 

Selles M, van Osch JA, Maas M, Boomsma MF, Wellenberg RH. Advances in metal artifact reduction in CT images: A review of traditional and novel metal artifact reduction techniques. Eur J Radiol. 2024;170: 111276.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Andersson KM, Dahlgren CV, Reizenstein J, Cao Y, Ahnesjö A, Thunberg P. Evaluation of two commercial CT metal artifact reduction algorithms for use in proton radiotherapy treatment planning in the head and neck area. Med Phys. 2018;45(10):4329–44.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kidoh M, Nakaura T, Nakamura S, Tokuyasu S, Osakabe H, Harada K, et al. Reduction of dental metallic artefacts in CT: value of a newly developed algorithm for metal artefact reduction (O-MAR). Clin Radiol. 2014;69(1):e11–6.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bayerl N, May MS, Wuest W, Roth J-P, Kramer M, Hofmann C, et al. Iterative metal artifact reduction in head and neck CT facilitates tumor visualization of oral and oropharyngeal cancer obscured by artifacts from dental hardware. Acad Radiol. 2023;30(12):2962–72.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chang W, Lee JM, Lee K, Yoon JH, Yu MH, Han JK, et al. Assessment of a model-based, iterative reconstruction algorithm (MBIR) regarding image quality and dose reduction in liver computed tomography. Invest Radiol. 2013;48(8):598–606.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Messerli M, Rengier F, Desbiolles L, Ehl NF, Bauer RW, Leschka S, et al. Impact of advanced modeled iterative reconstruction on coronary artery calcium quantification. Acad Radiol. 2016;23(12):1506–12.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Meyer E, Raupach R, Lell M, Schmidt B, Kachelrieß M. Normalized metal artifact reduction (NMAR) in computed tomography. Med Phys. 2010;37(10):5482–93.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kunz AS, Patzer TS, Grunz J-P, Luetkens KS, Hartung V, Hendel R, et al. Metal artifact reduction in ultra-high-resolution cone-beam CT imaging with a twin robotic X-ray system. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):15549.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar