Admixed individuals have largely been understudied in medical research due to their complex genetic ancestries. However, the consideration of admixture can help identify ancestry-enriched genetic associations, delineating some of the genetic underpinnings of cross-population phenotypic variation. To this end, we performed local ancestry inference within the All of Us Research Program to identify individuals with recent admixture between African (AFR) and European (EUR) populations (N=48,921). We identified evidence of local AFR ancestry enrichment at the HLA locus, suggestive of putative selection since admixture. Furthermore, we performed the largest admixture mapping (ADM) efforts in AFR-EUR Admixed individuals for 22 traits, identifying 71 associations between inferred local AFR ancestries and a trait. Variants from published GWAS could only account for 18 (25%) of the ADM associations, highlighting novel loci where ancestral haplotypes explained some phenotypic variation. Previous studies likely have not identified these loci due to the low availability of high-powered GWAS in populations genetically similar to AFR. One such loci was 9q21.33, associated with 1.4-fold risk of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) for carriers of inferred local AFR ancestries at the region. This locus contains the gene SLC28A3, which has previously been linked to kidney function but has never been associated with cross-population ESKD prevalence differences. Together, our results expand upon the existing literature on phenotypic differences between populations, highlighting loci where genetic ancestries play a critical role in the genetic architecture of disease.

The authors have declared no competing interest.

This study was funded by the CAPE award.

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Publicly available, individual-level phenotype and genetic data were pulled from the All of Us Research Program and UK Biobank after approval of our research proposal by ethical bodies for both datasets. The Penn Medicine Biobank IRB board approved of the use of phenotype and genetic data from Penn Medicine Biobank participants.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Individual-level phenotype and genetic data from All of Us are available on the All of Us Research Workbench for all approved, controlled-tier researchers, and phenotype and genetic data from UK Biobank are also publicly available for approved researchers. Inferred local ancestry data can be made available to other approved All of Us and UK Biobank researchers upon request. Individual-level data from Penn Medicine BioBank cannot be shared to researchers without an approved Penn Medicine BioBank IRB, but summary statistics can be made available upon reasonable request.