Kalender WA. X-ray computed tomography. Phys Med Biol. 2006;51(13):R29–43.

Article  Google Scholar 

Seeram E. Computed tomography: Physical principles, clinical applications, and quality control. Elsevier. Fourth edition. 2016.

Lolli V, Pezzullo M, Delpierre I. Sadeghi, N. MDCT imaging of traumatic brain injury. Br J Radiol. 2016;89:20150849.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bodanapally UK, Sours C, Zhuo J, Shanmuganathan K. Imaging of traumatic brain injury. Radiol Clin North Am. 2015;53(4):695–715.

Article  Google Scholar 

Wintermark M, Sincic R, Sridhar D, Chien JD. Cerebral perfusion CT: technique and clinical applications. J Neuroradiol. 2008;35(5):253–60.

Article  Google Scholar 

Mahendran SA, Flower O, Hemphill JCIII. Head CT for the intensivist: 10 tips and pearls. Minerva Anestesiol. 2022;88(6):508–15.

Article  Google Scholar 

Saeed MK, Tammam N, Sulieman A. Assessment of dose reduction and influence of gantry rotation time in CT abdomen examinations. Int J Radiat Res. 2021;19(1):223–30.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ishizaka H, Naka M, Nagase H, et al. A new brain CT reference line: the lower eyelid to the inner occipital base line closely parallels the Talairach–Tournoux line. Acta Radiol Open. 2020;9(1):1–6.

Google Scholar 

Lai CWK, Cheung HY, Chan TP, Wong TH. Reducing the radiation dose to the eye lens region during CT brain examination: the potential beneficial effect of the combined use of bolus and a bismuth shield. Radioprotection. 2015;50(3):195–201.

Article  Google Scholar 

Poon R, Badawy MK. Radiation dose and risk to the lens of the eye during CT examinations of the brain. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2019;63(6):786–94.

Article  Google Scholar 

Heaney DE, Norvill CAJ. A comparison of reduction in CT dose through the use of gantry angulations or bismuth shields. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2006;29(2):172–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178890

Article  Google Scholar 

Hoppe ME, Gandhi D, Stevens GM, Foley WD, Schmidt TG. The effects of gantry tilt on breast dose and image noise in cardiac CT. Med Phys. 2013;40(12):121905.

Article  Google Scholar 

Noo F, Defrise M, Kudo H. General reconstruction theory for multislice X-ray computed tomography with a gantry Tilt. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2004;23(9):1109–18.

Article  Google Scholar 

Fung KKL, Choi KHW, Hom H. Lens dose reduction in paediatric CT brain scan using the supra-orbitomeatal baseline technique. Poster presented at the European Congress of radiology (ECR). Poster Number: C-0994; 2005. https://doi.org/10.1594/ECR05/C-0994

Chapter  Google Scholar 

Parsi M, Sohrabi M, Mianji F, Paydar R. Gantry angulation effects on CT dose along the z-axis direction in head examinations. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2017;177(4):458–65. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncx064

Article  Google Scholar 

Ali STM, Hamad MM, Ayad CE, Abdalla EA, Ahmed AS. Evaluation of the technical specifications of computerized tomography scanners in Jazan. Sudan Med Monit. 2013;8(3):159–66. https://doi.org/10.4103/1858-5000.132611

Article  Google Scholar 

Anam C, Fujibuchi T, Toyoda T, et al. The impact of head miscentering on the eye lens dose in CT scanning: phantoms study. J Phys: Conf Ser. 2019;1204(1):012022.

Google Scholar 

Nishizawa K, Maruyama T, Takayama M, Okada M, Hachiya J, Furuya Y. Determinations of organ doses and effective dose equivalents from computed tomographic examination. Br J Radiol. 1991;64(757):20–8.

Article  Google Scholar 

Abou-Eleinein HS. Quality assurance for computed-tomography simulator: in home Z-phantom for mechanical tests of the couch and the gantry. Chin Ger J Clin Oncol. 2013;12(5):237–42.

Article  Google Scholar 

American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Specification and acceptance testing of computed tomography scanners (AAPM report no. 39). American Institute of Physics. 1993.

Sharma DS, Sharma SD, Sanu KK, Saju S, Deshpande DD, Kannan S. Performance evaluation of a dedicated computed tomography scanner used for virtual simulation using in-house fabricated CT phantoms. J Med Phys. 2006;31(1):1–6.

Article  Google Scholar 

Samei E, Pelc NJ, editors. Computed tomography. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26957-9_7

Noviliawati R, Anam C, Sutanto H, Dougherty G, Mak’ruf MR. Automatic validation of the gantry tilt in a computed tomography scanner using a head polymethyl methacrylate phantom. Pol J Med Phys Eng. 2021;27(1):57–62.

Article  Google Scholar 

Anam C, Amilia R, Naufal A, et al. Automated patient centering of computed tomography images and its implementation to evaluate clinical practices in three hospitals in Indonesia. Pol J Med Phys Eng. 2022;28(4):207–14.

Article  Google Scholar 

Liang H, Zhang C, Yan M. Data correction for gantry-tilted local CT. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2008;32(4):251–7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Boulter DJ, Rumboldt Z, Bonaldi G, Muto M, Cianfoni A. Tilting the gantry for CT-guided spine procedures. Radiol Med. 2014;119(5):405–11.

Google Scholar 

Meisen P, Jingtian T, Xiaoli Y. Tilt correction methods for CT and MR medical images. Biomed Eng: Appl Basis Comm. 2010;22(6):519–33.

Google Scholar 

Després P, Gaede S. COMP report: CPQR technical quality control guidelines for CT simulators. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018;19(2):12–7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Zappalá S, Bennion NJ, Potts MR, Wu J, Kusmia S, Jones DK, et al. Full-field MRI measurements of in-vivo positional brain shift reveal the significance of intra-cranial geometry and head orientation for stereotactic surgery. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):17684.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hein IA, Taguchi K, Silver MD, Kazama M, Mori I. Feldkamp-based cone-beam reconstruction for gantry-tilted helical multislice CT. Med Phys. 2004;30(12):3233–42.

Article  Google Scholar 

Prionas ND, Ray S, Boone JM. Volume assessment accuracy in computed tomography: a phantom study. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2010;11(2):168–80.

Article  Google Scholar