A Protocol Describing A Scoping Review to Characterise ICU Admission Criteria

ABSTRACT

Introduction Effectively identifying deteriorated patients is vital to the development and validation of automated systems designed to predict clinical deterioration. Existing outcome measures used for this purpose have significant limitations. Published criteria for admission to high acuity inpatient areas may represent markers of patient deterioration and could inform the development of alternate outcome measures.

Objectives This is a protocol for a scoping review which aims to characterise published criteria for admission of adult inpatients to high acuity inpatient areas including intensive care units.

Data sources Electronic databases PubMed and ProQuest EBook Central will be searched to identify papers published from 1999 to date of search. Publications of interest are those which describe prescriptive criteria for admission of adult inpatients to a clinical area with a higher level of care than a general hospital ward.

Charting methods Data will be extracted from each publication using a standardised data-charting form.

Data synthesis Admission criteria characteristics from included publications will be summarised and presented in text and summary table form.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any funding.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.

Comments (0)

No login
gif