Intravascular Imaging-Guided Versus Coronary Angiography-Guided Complex PCI: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Suero JA, Marso SP, Jones PG, et al. Procedural outcomes and long-term survival among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention of a chronic total occlusion in native coronary arteries: a 20-year experience. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38(2):409–14.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Patel MR, Marso SP, Dai D, et al. Comparative effectiveness of drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents in elderly patients undergoing revascularization of chronic total coronary occlusions: results from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry, 2005–2008. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5(10):1054–61.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Van den Branden BJ, Rahel BM, Laarman GJ, et al. Five-year clinical outcome after primary stenting of totally occluded native coronary arteries: a randomised comparison of bare metal stent implantation with sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for the treatment of total coronary occlusions (PRISON II study). EuroIntervention. 2012;7(10):1189–96.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rathore S, Katoh O, Matsuo H, et al. Retrograde percutaneous recanalization of chronic total occlusion of the coronary arteries: procedural outcomes and predictors of success in contemporary practice. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2(2):124–32.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ramadan R, Boden WE, Kinlay S. Management of left main coronary artery disease. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(7):e008151.

Park DW, Park SJ. Intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for left main disease: does procedural fine-tuning make a relevant clinical benefit? Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10(5):e005293.

Yamamoto K, Shiomi H, Morimoto T, et al. Optimal intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease. JACC Asia. 2023;3(2):211–25.

Gaster AL, Slothuus Skjoldborg U, Larsen J, et al. Continued improvement of clinical outcome and cost effectiveness following intravascular ultrasound guided PCI: insights from a prospective, randomised study. Heart. 2003;89(9):1043–9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Darmoch F, Alraies MC, Al-Khadra Y, et al. Intravascular ultrasound imaging-guided versus coronary angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(5): e013678.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

De Franco AC, Nissen SE. Coronary intravascular ultrasound: implications for understanding the development and potential regression of atherosclerosis. Am J Cardiol. 2001;88(10A):7M–20M.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Elgendy IY, Ha LD, Elbadawi A, et al. Temporal trends in inpatient use of intravascular imaging among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11(9):913–5.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2022;145(3):e4–17.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Räber L, Mintz SG, Koskinas CK, et al. Clinical use of intracoronary imaging. Part 1: guidance and optimization of coronary interventions. An expert consensus document of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions. EuroIntervention. 2018;14(6):656–77.

Johnson WT, Räber L, Di Mario C, et al. Clinical use of intracoronary imaging. Part 2: acute coronary syndromes, ambiguous coronary angiography findings, and guiding interventional decision-making: an expert consensus document of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions. EuroIntervention. 2019;15(5):434–51.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jakabcin J, Spacek R, Bystron M, et al. Long-term health outcome and mortality evaluation after invasive coronary treatment using drug eluting stents with or without the IVUS guidance. Randomized control trial. HOME DES IVUS. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;75(4):578–83.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chieffo A, Latib A, Caussin C, et al. A prospective, randomized trial of intravascular-ultrasound guided compared to angiography guided stent implantation in complex coronary lesions: the AVIO trial. Am Heart J. 2013;165(1):65–72.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kim BK, Shin DH, Hong MK, et al. Clinical impact of intravascular ultrasound-guided chronic total occlusion intervention with zotarolimus-eluting versus biolimus-eluting stent implantation: randomized study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8(7): e002592.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tian NL, Gami SK, Ye F, et al. Angiographic and clinical comparisons of intravascular ultrasound- versus angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation for patients with chronic total occlusion lesions: two-year results from a randomised AIR-CTO study. EuroIntervention. 2015;10(12):1409–17.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hong SJ, Mintz GS, Ahn CM, et al. Effect of Intravascular ultrasound-guided drug-eluting stent implantation: 5-year follow-up of the IVUS-XPL randomized trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13(1):62–71.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gao XF, Ge Z, Kong XQ, et al. 3-year outcomes of the ULTIMATE trial comparing intravascular ultrasound versus angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14(3):247–57.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lee JM, Choi KH, Song YB, et al. Intravascular imaging-guided or angiography-guided complex PCI. N Engl J Med. 2023:388(18):1668–79.

Tan Q, Wang Q, Liu D, et al. Intravascular ultrasound-guided unprotected left main coronary artery stenting in the elderly. Saudi Med J. 2015;36(5):549–53.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kim JS, Kang TS, Mintz GS, et al. Randomized comparison of clinical outcomes between intravascular ultrasound and angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation for long coronary artery stenoses. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6(4):369–76.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Liu XM, Yang ZM, Liu XK, et al. Intravascular ultrasound-guided drug-eluting stent implantation for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery lesions: a single-center randomized trial. Anatol J Cardiol. 2019;21(2):83–90.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000100.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Applegate RJ, Sacrinty MT, Little WC, et al. Incidence of coronary stent thrombosis based on academic research consortium definitions. Am J Cardiol. 2008;102(6):683–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Garcia-Garcia HM, McFadden EP, Farb A, et al. Standardized end point definitions for coronary intervention trials: the Academic Research Consortium-2 Consensus Document. Circulation. 2018;137(24):2635–50.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557–60.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Elgendy IY, Mahmoud AN, Elgendy AY, et al. Outcomes with intravascular ultrasound-guided stent implantation: a meta-analysis of randomized trials in the era of drug-eluting stents. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(4): e003700.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Buccheri S, Franchina G, Romano S, et al. Clinical outcomes following intravascular imaging-guided versus coronary angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of 31 studies and 17,882 patients. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10(24):2488–98.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shin DH, Hong SJ, Mintz GS, et al. Effects of intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided new-generation drug-eluting stent implantation: meta-analysis with individual patient-level data from 2,345 randomized patients. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(21):2232–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Elgendy IY, Gad M, Mintz GS. Meta-analysis of intravascular ultrasound-guided drug-eluting stent implantation for left main coronary disease. Am J Cardiol. 2020;1(128):92–3.

Article  Google Scholar 

Elgendy IY, Mahmoud AN, Elgendy AY, et al. Intravascular ultrasound-guidance is associated with lower cardiovascular mortality and myocardial infarction for drug-eluting stent implantation—insights from an updated meta-analysis of randomized trials. Circ J. 2019;83(6):1410–3.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bhogal S, Hashim H, Merdler I, et al. Impact of IVUS and OCT on physician decision-making during post-PCI optimization. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2023;55:96–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Barus P, Piasecki A, Gumiezna K, et al. Multimodality OCT, IVUS and FFR evaluation of coronary intermediate grade lesions in women vs. men. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023;10:1021023.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Comments (0)

No login
gif