Allyse MA, Robinson DH, Ferber MJ, Sharp RR (2018) Direct-to-consumer testing 2.0: emerging models of direct-to-consumer genetic testing. Mayo Clin Proc 93:113–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.11.001

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bansback N, Sizto S, Guh D, Anis AH (2012) The Effect of direct-to-consumer genetic tests on anticipated affect and health-seeking behaviors: a pilot survey. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 16:1165–1171. https://doi.org/10.1089/gtmb.2012.0074

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Baptista NM, Christensen KD, Carere DA et al (2016) Adopting genetics: motivations and outcomes of personal genomic testing in adult adoptees. Genet Med 18:924–932. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2015.192

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bevilaqua B (2024) Mundo Startup entrevista CEO do primeiro laboratório genético do Brasil. In: Estado de Minas. https://www.em.com.br/colunistas/mundo-startup/2024/03/6817891-mundo-startup-entrevista-ceo-do-primeiro-laboratorio-genetico-do-brasil.htm. Accessed 26 Jun 2024

Bloss CS, Schork NJ, Topol EJ (2011) Effect of direct-to-consumer genomewide profiling to assess disease risk. N Engl J Med 364:524–534. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1011893

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bloss CS, Wineinger NE, Darst BF et al (2013) Impact of direct-to-consumer genomic testing at long term follow-up. J Med Genet 50:393–400. https://doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2012-101207

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bloss CS, Schork NJ, Topol EJ (2014) Direct-to-consumer pharmacogenomic testing is associated with increased physician utilisation. J Med Genet 51:83–89. https://doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2013-101909

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Caulfield T (2011) Direct-to-consumer testing: if consumers are not anxious, why are policymakers? Hum Genet 130:23–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-011-0987-8

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Covolo L, Rubinelli S, Ceretti E, Gelatti U (2015) Internet-based direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res 17:e279. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4378

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Dar-Nimrod I, Zuckerman M, Duberstein PR (2013) The effects of learning about one’s own genetic susceptibility to alcoholism: a randomized experiment. Genet Med 15:132–138. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2012.111

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Egglestone C, Morris A, O’Brien A (2013) Effect of direct-to-consumer genetic tests on health behaviour and anxiety: a survey of consumers and potential consumers. J Genet Couns 22:565–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-013-9582-6

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Francke U, Dijamco C, Kiefer AK et al (2013) Dealing with the unexpected: consumer responses to direct-access BRCA mutation testing. PeerJ 1:e8. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Gerdes A-M, Nicolaisen L, Husum E et al (2021) Direct to consumer genetic testing in Denmark—public knowledge, use, and attitudes. Eur J Hum Genet 29:851–860. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-021-00810-3

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Gollust SE, Gordon ES, Zayac C et al (2012) Motivations and perceptions of early adopters of personalized genomics: perspectives from research participants. Public Health Genomics 15:22–30. https://doi.org/10.1159/000327296

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gordon ES, Griffin G, Wawak L et al (2012) “It’s Not Like Judgment Day”: Public understanding of and reactions to personalized genomic risk information. J Genet Couns 21:423–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-011-9476-4

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Harris BHL, McCabe C, Shafique H et al (2024) Diversity of thought: public perceptions of genetic testing across ethnic groups in the UK. J Hum Genet 69:19–25. https://doi.org/10.1038/s10038-023-01199-1

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hartz SM, Olfson E, Culverhouse R et al (2015) Return of individual genetic results in a high-risk sample: enthusiasm and positive behavioral change. Genet Med 17:374–379. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2014.110

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hock KT, Christensen KD, Yashar BM et al (2011) Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: an assessment of genetic counselors’ knowledge and beliefs. Genet Med 13:325–332. https://doi.org/10.1097/GIM.0b013e3182011636

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Horton R, Crawford G, Freeman L et al (2019) Direct-to-consumer genetic testing. BMJ l5688. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l5688

Hui VCC, Li HC, Chow JHK et al (2021) Understanding and perception of direct-to-consumer genetic testing in Hong Kong. J Genet Couns 30:1640–1648. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1430

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE) (2023) Censo demográfico 2022 : identificação étnico-racial da população, por sexo e idade : resultados do universo. https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/periodicos/3105/cd_2022_etnico_racial.pdf. Accessed 22 Nov 2024

ISOGG Wiki (2024) Autosomal DNA testing comparison chart. https://isogg.org/wiki/Autosomal_DNA_testing_comparison_chart. Accessed 25 Jun 2024

Kaufman DJ, Bollinger JM, Dvoskin RL, Scott JA (2012) Risky business: risk perception and the use of medical services among customers of DTC personal genetic testing. J Genet Couns 21:413–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-012-9483-0

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kilbride MK, Kessler LJ, Cronier B et al (2024) Test-takers’ perspectives on consumer genetic testing for hereditary cancer risk. Front Genet 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2024.1374602

Leighton JW, Valverde K, Bernhardt BA (2012) The general public’s understanding and perception of direct-to-consumer genetic test results. Public Health Genomics 15:11–21. https://doi.org/10.1159/000327159

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lippi G, Favaloro EJ, Plebani M (2011) Direct-to-consumer testing: more risks than opportunities. Int J Clin Pract 65:1221–1229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02774.x

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lu M, Lewis CM, Traylor M (2017) Pharmacogenetic testing through the direct-to-consumer genetic testing company 23andMe. BMC Med Genomics 10:47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12920-017-0283-0

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Markos E, Milne GR, Peltier JW (2017) Information sensitivity and willingness to provide continua: a comparative privacy study of the United States and Brazil. J Public Policy Mark 36:79–96. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.15.159

Article  Google Scholar 

McGuire AL, Diaz CM, Wang T, Hilsenbeck SG (2009) Social networkers’ attitudes toward direct-to-consumer personal genome testing. Am J Bioeth 9:3–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265160902928209

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Moscarello T, Murray B, Reuter CM, Demo E (2019) Direct-to-consumer raw genetic data and third-party interpretation services: more burden than bargain? Genet Med 21:539–541. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-018-0097-2

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nguyen Dolphyn TT, Ormond KE, Weissman SM et al (2023) Patient experiences with clinical confirmatory genetic testing after using direct-to-consumer raw DNA and third-party genetic interpretation services. Transl Behav Med 13:104–114. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibac083

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nolan JJ, Ormondroyd E (2023) Direct-to-consumer genetic tests providing health risk information: A systematic review of consequences for consumers and health services. Clin Genet 104:3–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/cge.14332

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

O’Neill SC, Tercyak KP, Baytop C et al (2015) A new approach to assessing affect and the emotional implications of personal genomic testing for common disease risk. Public Health Genomics 18:104–112. https://doi.org/10.1159/000370101

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Oh B (2019) Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: advantages and pitfalls. Genomics Inform 17:e33. https://doi.org/10.5808/GI.2019.17.3.e33

Article