Samson P, Puri V, Broderick S et al (2017) Adhering to quality measures in esophagectomy is associated with improved survival in all stages of esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 103:1101–1108

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Burton PR, Ooi GJ, Shaw K et al (2018) Assessing quality of care in oesophago-gastric cancer surgery in Australia. ANZ J Surg 88:290–295

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Staal EFWC, Wouters MWJM, Boot H et al (2010) Quality-of-care indicators for oesophageal cancer surgery: a review. Eur J Surg Oncol 36:1035–1043

Article  Google Scholar 

Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE et al (2003) Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 349:2117–2127

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rouvelas I, Lagergren J (2010) The impact of volume on outcomes after oesophageal cancer surgery. ANZ J Surg 80:634–641

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gordon TA, Bowman HM, Bass EB et al (1999) Complex gastrointestinal surgery: impact of provider experience on clinical and economic outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 189:46–56

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rourke AJ (1957) Evaluating the quality of medical care. Hosp Prog 38:72–73

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (2023) OCEBM Levels of Evidence [Internet]. Nuffield department of primary care health sciences: university of Oxford; 2023 [Cited 5 June 2022.] Available from: https://www.cebm.net/2016/05/ocebm-levels-of-evidence/

Adhia A, Feinglass J, Schlick CJ et al (2020) Adherence to quality measures improves survival in esophageal cancer in a retrospective cohort of the national cancer database from 2004 to 2016. J Thorac Dis 12:5441–5459

Article  Google Scholar 

Stephens MR, Lewis WG, Brewster AE et al (2006) Multidisciplinary team management is associated with improved outcomes after surgery for esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus 19:164–171

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Low DE (2015) Enhanced recovery pathways lead to an improvement in postoperative outcomes following esophagectomy: systematic review and pooled analysis. Dis Esophagus 28:468–475

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ajani JA, D’Amico TA, Bentrem DJ et al (2019) Esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer version 2. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 17:855–883

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Matsuda S, Kataga Y (2021) The potential of lymph node yield as a quality indicator of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 28:9–10

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Merkow RP, Bilimoria KY, Chow WB et al (2012) Variation in lymph node examination after esophagectomy for cancer in the United States. Arch Surg 147:505–511

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schlick CJR, Khorfan R, Odell DD et al (2020) Adequate lymphadenectomy as a quality measure in esophageal cancer: Is there an association with treatment approach? Ann Surg Oncol 27:4443–4456

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kalff MC, van Berge Henegouwen MI (2021) Textbook outcome for esophageal cancer surgery: An international consensus-based update of a quality measure. Dis Esophagus 34:doab011

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Helminen O, Mrena J, Sihvo E (2020) Benchmark values for transthoracic esophagectomy are not set as the defined “best possible”–a validation study. Ann Thorac Surg 109:383–388

Google Scholar 

Carroll PA, Jacob N, Yeung JC et al (2020) Using benchmarking standards to evaluate transition to minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 109:383–388

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Busweiler LA, Henneman D, Dikken JL et al (2017) Failure-to-rescue in patients undergoing surgery for esophageal or gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 43:1962–1969

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hall KK, Lim A, Gale B (2020) Failure to rescue. In: Making healthcare safer III: a critical analysis of existing and emerging patient safety practices. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US), Rockville, pp 102–117

Walters DM, McMurry TL, Isbell JM et al (2014) Understanding mortality as a quality indicator after esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 98:502–506

Article  Google Scholar 

Staiger RD, Gutschow CA (2019) Benchmark analyses in minimally invasive esophagectomy–impact on surgical quality improvement. J Thorac Dis 11:S771-776

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Talsma AK, Lingsma HF, Steyerberg EW et al (2014) The 30-day versus in-hospital and 90-day mortality after esophagectomy as indicators for quality of care. Ann Surg 260:267–273

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Al Azzawi M, Bolger J, Whooley J et al (2020) Textbook surgical outcomes in esophageal cancer: the influence of national key performance indicators. Dis Esophagus 33:doaa087-45

Article  Google Scholar 

In H, Palis BE, Merkow RP et al (2016) Doubling of 30-day mortality by 90-days after esophagectomy: a critical measure of outcomes for quality improvement. Ann Surg 263:286–291

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schmidt HM, Gisbertz S, Moons J et al (2017) Defining benchmarks for transthoracic esophagectomy. Ann Surg 266:814–821

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kulshrestha S, Bunn C, Patel PM et al (2020) Textbook oncologic outcome is associated with increased overall survival after esophagectomy. Surgery 168:953–961

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ng SP, Leong T (2021) Indications for definitive chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal cancer. Ann Esophagus 4:43

Article  Google Scholar 

Stordeur S, Vlayen J, Vrijens F et al (2015) Quality indicators for oesophageal and gastric cancer: a population-based study in Belgium, 2004–2008. Eur J Cancer Care 24:376–386

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Bolger JC, Al Azzawi M, Whooley J et al (2021) Surgery by a minimally invasive approach is associated with improved textbook outcomes in oesophageal and gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 47:2332–2339

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Markar SR, Schmidt H, Kunz S et al (2014) Evolution of standardized clinical pathways: refining multidisciplinary care and process to improve outcomes of the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 18:1238–1246

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mariette C, Markar SR, Dabakuyo-Yonli TS et al (2019) Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 380:152–162

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Straatman J, van der Wielen N, Cuesta MA et al (2017) Minimally invasive versus open esophageal resection: three-year follow-up of the previously reported randomized controlled trial: the TIME Trial. Ann Surg 266:232–236

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yang Y, Li B, Yi J et al (2022) Robot-assisted versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: early results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial: the RAMIE trial. Ann Surg 275:646–653

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Busweiler LAD, Wijnhoven BPL, van Berge Henegouwen MI et al (2016) The dutch upper GI cancer audit: 2011–2014. J Clin Oncol 34:309

Article  Google Scholar 

Queensland Government (2017) Queensland oesophagogastric surgery quality index: indicators of safe, quality cancer care. Cancer surgery in public and private hospitals 2004–2013. Queensland Health, Brisbane

Low DE, Kuppusamy MK, Alderson D et al (2019) Benchmarking complications associated with esophagectomy. Ann Surg 269:291–298

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Low DE, Kunz S, Schembre D et al (2007) Esophagectomy- it’s not just about mortality anymore: standardized perioperative clinical pathways improve outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 11:1395–1402

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Busweiler LA, Schouwenburg MG, van Berge Henegouwen MI et al (2017) Textbook outcome as a composite measure in oesophageogastric cancer surgery. Br J Surg 104:742–750

Article  CAS