Embedding radical prostatectomy specimens: selective with regular cassettes or complete with large cassettes

Bernhardt M, Hommerding O, Kreft T et al (2024) Prospective selective embedding of radical prostatectomy specimens is not inferior to full embedding regarding established and new prognostic parameters. Virchows Arch. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-024-03931-4

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Duan L, Liu Z, Wan F, Dai B (2024) Advantage of whole-mount histopathology in prostate cancer: current applications and future prospects. BMC Cancer 24(1):448

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Montironi R, Lopez-Beltran A, Scarpelli M et al (2011) Handling of radical prostatectomy specimens: total embedding with whole mounts, with special reference to the Ancona experience. Histopathology 59(5):1006–10

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vainer B, Toft BG, Olsen KE et al (2011) Handling of radical prostatectomy specimens: total or partial embedding? Histopathology 58:211–216

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Montironi R, Cheng L, Lopez-Beltran A et al (2013) Combined handling of prostate base/bladder neck and seminal vesicles in radical prostatectomy specimens: our approach with the whole mount technique. Histopathology 63(3):431–5

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mazzucchelli R, Barbisan F, Tagliabracci A et al (2007) Search for residual prostate cancer on pT0 radical prostatectomy after positive biopsy. Virchows Arch 450(4):371–8

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Mazzucchelli R, Scarpelli M, Lopez-Beltran A et al (2007) Macrocryosectioning and complete sampling of the prostate in a potential multiorgan donor candidate. J Clin Pathol 60(8):951–2

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Cimadamore A, Cheng L, Lopez-Beltran A et al (2021) Added clinical value of whole-mount histopathology of radical prostatectomy specimens: a collaborative review. Eur Urol Oncol 4(4):558–569

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Montironi R, Cimadamore A, Lopez-Beltran A et al (2021) Exciting experiences in the ‘Rocky road to digital diagnostics.’ J Clin Pathol 74(1):5–6

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cimadamore A, Scarpelli M, Cheng L et al (2022) Digital whole mount sections of the prostate: heading towards new ways of communicating with clinicians and patients without microscope. Minerva Urol Nephrol 74(1):127–129

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cimadamore A, Cheng L, Lopez-Beltran A, et al. (2024) Macro-microscopic evaluation of pathology specimens with large format histology. For the benefit of ‘our service users and patients’. J Clin Pathol https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp-2024-209543

Pallua JD, Brunner A, Zelger B et al (2020) The future of pathology is digital. Pathol Res Pract 216(9):153040

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Montironi R, Cimadamore A, Massari F et al (2017) Whole slide imaging of large format histology in prostate pathology: potential for information fusion. Arch Pathol Lab Med 141(11):1460–1461

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cimadamore A, Montironi R, Cheng L et al (2024) The uropathologist of the future: getting ready with intelligence for the prostate cancer tsunami. Pathologica 116:267–272

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Suarez-Ibarrola R, Sigle A, Eklund M et al (2021) Artificial intelligence in magnetic resonance imaging-based prostate cancer diagnosis: where do we stand in 2021? Eur Urol Focus S2405–4569(21):00099–7

Google Scholar 

Rocco B, Cimadamore A, Sarchi L et al (2021) Current and future perspectives of digital microscopy with fluorescence confocal microscope for prostate tissue interpretation: a narrative review. Transl Androl Urol 10(3):1569–1580

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Comments (0)

No login
gif