Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O., & Weber, T. J. (2009). Leadership: Current theories, research, and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 421–449.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Baker, D. F. (2001). The development of collective efficacy in small task groups. Small Group Research, 32(4), 451–474.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bass, B. M. (1954). The leaderless group discussion. Psychological Bulletin, 51(5), 465–492. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0056881

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass and Stogdill’s handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications. Free Press.

Google Scholar 

Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. (2002). A typology of virtual teams implications for effective leadership. Group & Organization Management, 27(1), 14–49.

Article  Google Scholar 

Brown, S. G., Hill, S., & Lorinkova, N. M. (2021). Leadership and virtual team performance: A meta-analytic investigation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psycholoy, 30(5), 672–685.

Article  Google Scholar 

Brynjolfsson, E., Horton, J. J., Ozimek, A., Rock, D., Sharma, G., & TuYe, H. Y. (2020). COVID-19 and remote work: An early look at US Data (No. w27344). National Bureau of Economic Research.

Burke, C. S., Stagl, K. C., Klein, C., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Halpin, S. M. (2006). What type of leadership behaviors are functional in teams? A Meta-Analysis. the Leadership Quarterly, 17(3), 288–307.

Article  Google Scholar 

Cameron, A. C., & Miller, D. L. (2015). A practitioner’s guide to cluster-robust inference. Journal of Human Resources, 50(2), 317–372.

Article  Google Scholar 

Cascio, W. F., & Shurygailo, S. (2003). E-leadership and virtual teams. Organizational Dynamics, 31(4), 362–376.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ceri-Booms, M., Curseu, P. L., & Oerlemans, L. A. G. (2017). Task and person-focused leaderhsip behaviors and team performance: A meta-analysis. Human Resource Management Review, 27(1), 178–192.

Article  Google Scholar 

Choi, S. B., Kim, K., & Kang, S. W. (2017). Effects of transformational and shared leadership styles on employees’ perception of team effectiveness. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 45(3), 377–386.

Article  Google Scholar 

Condon, D. M., & Revelle, W. (2014). The International Cognitive Ability Resource: Development and initial validation of a public-domain measure. Intelligence, 43, 52–64.

Article  Google Scholar 

Cooke, N. J., Salas, E., Kiekel, P. A., & Bell, B. (2004). Advances in measuring team cognition. In E. Salas & S. M. Fiore (Eds.), Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance (pp. 83–106). American Psychological Association.

Chapter  Google Scholar 

Crawford, E. R., & LePine, J. A. (2013). A configural theory of team processes: Accounting for the structure of taskwork and teamwork. Academy of Management Review, 38(1), 32–48.

Article  Google Scholar 

Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571.

Article  Google Scholar 

De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 741–749.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

DeChurch, L. A., Hiller, N. J., Murase, T., Doty, D., & Salas, E. (2010). Leadership across levels: Levels of leaders and their levels of impact. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), 1069–1085.

Article  Google Scholar 

Denison, D. R., Hooijberg, R., & Quinn, R. E. (1995). Paradox and performance: Toward a theory of behavioral complexity in managerial leadership. Organization Science, 6(5), 524–540.

Article  Google Scholar 

Driskell, J., Salas, E., & Hughes, S. (2010). Collective orientation and team performance: Development of an individual differences measure. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 52(2), 316–328.

Article  Google Scholar 

Fleishman, E. A., Mumford, M. D., Zaccaro, S. J., Levin, K. Y., Korotkin, A. L., & Hein, M. B. (1991). Taxonomic efforts in the description of leader behavior: A synthesis and functional interpretation. The Leadership Quarterly, 2(4), 245–287.

Article  Google Scholar 

Fletcher, K. A., & Brannick, M. T. (2022). Conflict behaviors mediate effects of manipulated leader-member exchange on team-oriented outcomes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 37, 977–997.

Article  Google Scholar 

Gibson, C. B., & Gibbs, J. L. (2006). Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(3), 451–495.

Article  Google Scholar 

Gladstein, D. L. (1984). Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(4), 499–517.

Article  Google Scholar 

Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality Psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7–28). Tilburg University Press.

Google Scholar 

Guchait, P., Lei, P., & Tews, M. J. (2016). Making teamwork work: Team knowledge for team effectiveness. The Journal of Psychology, 150(3), 300–317.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

House, R. J., & Mitchell, T. R. (1974). Path-goal theory of leadership. Journal of Contemporary Business, 3, 81–97.

Google Scholar 

Hu, J., & Judge, T. A. (2017). Leader–team complementarity: Exploring the interactive effects of leader personality traits and team power distance values on team processes and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(6), 935–955.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ilgen, D. R., & Fujii, D. S. (1976). An investigation of the validity of leader behavior descriptions obtained from subordinates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(5), 642–651. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.61.5.642

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Indvik, J. (1988). A more complete testing of path-goal theory. Paper Presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Anaheim, CA.

Judge, T. A., Piccolo, R. F., & Ilies, R. (2004). The forgotten ones? The validity of consideration and initiating structure in leadership research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 36–51.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kamouri, A., & Lister, K. (2020). Global Work-from-Home Experience Survey. Iometrics and Global Workplace Analytics. Available online at: https://globalworkplaceanalytics.com

Kirkman, B. L., & Mathieu, J. E. (2005). The dimensions and antecedents of team virtuality. Journal of Management, 31(5), 700–718.

Article  Google Scholar 

Lafferty, J. C., & Pond, A. W. (1974). The desert survival situation. Plymouth, MI Human Synergistics.

Lister, K., & Kamouri, A. (2020). Survey reveals 76% of global office workers want to continue working from home post-COVID-19. Global Workplace Analytics. https://globalworkplaceanalytics.com/brags/news-releases

Mathieu, J. E., Hollenbeck, J. R., van Knippenberg, D., & Ilgen, D. R. (2017). A century of work teams in the Journal of Applied Psychology. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 452–467.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Maurer, T. J., & Tarulli, B. A. (1994). Investigation of perceived environment, perceived outcome, and person variables in relationship to voluntary development activity by employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(1), 3–14.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Morgeson, F. P., DeRue, D. S., & Karam, E. P. (2010). Leadership in teams: A functional approach to understanding leadership structures and processes. Journal of Management, 36(1), 5–39.

Article  Google Scholar 

Moss, A. J., Rosenzweig, C., Jaffe, S. N., Gautam, R., Robinson, J., & Litman, L. (2021). Bots or inattentive humans? Identifying sources of low-quality data in online platforms.

Northouse, P. G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and practice. Sage publications.

Google Scholar 

Patroom, K. (2018). Differential relationship of person- and task-focused leadership to team effectiveness: A meta-analysis of moderators. Human Resource Development Review, 17(4), 393–439.

Article  Google Scholar 

Riggs, M. L., & Knight, P. A. (1994). The impact of perceived group success-failure on motivational beliefs and attitudes: A causal model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(5), 755–766.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02

Article  Google Scholar 

Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(2), 224–253.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Salas, E., Shuffler, M. L., Thayer, A. L., Bedwell, W. L., & Lazzara, E. H. (2015). Understanding and improving teamwork in organizations: A scientifically based practical guide. Human Resource Management, 54(4), 599–622.

Article  Google Scholar 

Society for Human Resource Management. (2012). Virtual teams utilized by nearly half of organizations surveyed.

Stajkovic, A. D., Lee, D., & Nyberg, A. J. (2009). Collective efficacy, group potency, and group performance: Meta-analyses of their relationships, and test of a mediation model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3), 814–828.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Stark, A. (2021). Top 10 Work Trends for 2021. Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. https://www.siop.org/Research-Publications/Items-of-Interest/ArtMID/19366/ArticleID/4914/Top-10-Work-Trends-for-2021

Sy, T., Côté, S., & Saavedra, R. (2005). The contagious leader: Impact of the leader’s mood on the mood of group members, group affective tone, and group processes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(2), 295–305.

Article  PubMed