Individuals with anorexia nervosa (AN) are typically anhedonic, leading to the suggestion that intrinsic disturbances of reward processing may represent a trait marker of the disorder. Previous studies have used task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate reward-related brain activity in AN and reported altered activation in the prefrontal cortex, dorsal posterior cingulate cortex, and rostral anterior cingulate cortex. However, likely due to the varied paradigms and methodologies used, as well as the heterogeneity in sample characteristics, results have proved inconsistent. To determine whether AN patients with the restrictive subtype (AN-r) show different reward-induced activation patterns to matched healthy controls (HCs) at different illness stages, we conducted a meta-analysis of 19 task-based fMRI studies of reward-processing. Using the seed-based differential mapping (SDM) technique, we found differences in reward-related brain activity between AN-r and HCs. Moreover, different brain regions showed differential activation across illness stages, with the direction and magnitude of effects dependent on specific task stimuli. These findings suggest that those with AN-r show distorted reward processing as a consequence of reward contamination and alterations in valence assignment to reward stimuli. In weight-recovered AN-r patients, differences to HCs persisted but were limited to regions known to exhibit significant atrophy in AN-r, indicating that altered reward processing is associated with anorectic undernutrition. These findings have implications for developing pharmacological treatments to aid psychological recovery in AN-r.
Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding StatementThis research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study used ONLY human data openly available on the Web of Science and PubMed.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data AvailabilityThe data used in this review are publicly available and specific references to the datasets and data sources used are provided in the references section of the manuscript.
Comments (0)