Objective To describe the implementation of oral health evidence-based practices in early care education (ECE) centers enrolled in the web-based Go NAPSACC program pre-, during, and post-COVID- 19 stay-at-home (SAH) orders.

Methods Retroactive data from three types of programs (n=2,018), who participated in Go NAPSACC oral health modules, Head Start (n=215), family child care home (FCCH; n=688), and center- based (n=1,115) were analyzed for evidence-based practices (EBP) met. EBP total and EBP met percent scores are reported.

Results We found significant differences in oral health EBP total and EBP met percent scores between program type (p<0.001). Head Start programs had statistically significant higher EBP total percentage scores (81.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 78.5, 85.2; p<0.0001) than FCCH (69.5, 95% CI = 67.1, 71.8; p<0.0001), and center-based (59.5, 95% CI = 57.3, 61.7) programs. Head Start programs also had statistically significant higher EBP met scores (62.0, 95% CI = 57.7, 66.3; p<0.0001), than FCCH (49.7, 95% CI = 46.7, 52.7; p<0.0001), and center-based (36.9, 95% CI = 34.1, 39.8) programs. We observed no statistically significant differences among programs based on SAH order period for neither EBP total percentage scores (period, p=0.761; interaction between program type and period, p=0.788) and EBP met scores (period, p=0.178; interaction between program type and SAH order period, p=0.293).

Conclusions All ECE programs struggled to meet oral health evidence-based practices during three COVID- 19 SAH periods. SAH orders did not explain the difference observed across the three programs.

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Yes

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This study analyzed available organizational level data with no individual level identifiable personal information, therefore ethics approval and informed consent were not required

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

All data files will be available from the The Carolina Digital Repository database.