Based on electromyography (EMG) recordings, EMG-EMG coherence method provides a practical approach to investigate neural mechanisms involved in locomotion. Although some studies indicated an influence of age and walking conditions on EMG-EMG coherence, no clear consensus emerged from the existing literature. The aim of this scoping review was to map the current literature on EMG-EMG coherence in healthy adults across ages and walking tasks. Six databases (CINAHL, Cochrane Central, CDSR, MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science) were searched, resulting in 31 studies included (575 healthy individuals). These studies analyzed EMG-EMG coherence of muscles involved during different locomotor tasks. The results revealed a consensus regarding the decrease in EMG-EMG coherence during walking with aging, particularly in the Beta and Gamma bands, which could be attributed to natural alterations in the corticospinal tract with age. Furthermore, Beta and Gamma EMG-EMG coherence showed an increased tendency during challenging proprioceptive and proactive locomotor tasks, which is interpreted as an enhancement of cortical involvement in gait control. This review also highlights the necessity for future research to examine EMG-EMG coherence in additional frequency bands, such as Alpha, utilizing standardized signal processing techniques and frequency classifications, and to investigate coherence in children across various locomotor tasks.
NEW & NOTEWORTHY The EMG-EMG coherence method, based on electromyography recordings, is a practical tool to study neural mechanisms in locomotion. This scoping review explores the effect of age and walking conditions on EMG-EMG coherence during gait in healthy individuals. The results revealed a strong tendency of EMG-EMG coherence to decrease during aging and to increase during challenging proprioceptive and proactive locomotor tasks. This review also highlights gaps knowledge in children, and methodological concerns for coherence assessment.
Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statementnone
Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Comments (0)