It is unclear whether muscle functional adaptations to concentric (CON-RT) and eccentric (ECC-RT) resistance training are most specific to their exercise characteristics or the structural adaptations they evoke. In this study, the effects of effort- and volume-matched CON-RT and ECC-RT on regional hypertrophy, muscle architecture, and function were compared, and associations between the outcomes were explored. Twelve trained young men (25.5±3.6y) completed 18 isokinetic ankle-dorsiflexion exercise sessions over 6 weeks: CON-RT in one leg and ECC-RT in the other (2-4 sets, 6-10 maximal repetitions, 10°/s). Tibialis anterior size and architecture (ultrasound imaging) and maximum voluntary dorsiflexion function (isokinetic dynamometry) were assessed. Muscle thickness increased similarly between conditions and across proximal-distal regions (8%), pennation angle increased more in CON-RT (8%) than ECC-RT (4%), and fascicle length increased only after ECC-RT (7%). Functional adaptations were more closely associated with specific structural adaptations than with contraction mode, velocity, or angle. Isometric torque increased similarly in both conditions overall (8%) but CON-RT improved only at shorter muscle lengths and shifted the peak-torque angle leftward, whereas ECC-RT improved at both shorter and longer lengths and broadened the torque-angle plateau, which was associated with fascicle length increases. ECC-RT produced greater increases in both eccentric (13%) and concentric torques (17%) than CON-RT (3%, 9%, respectively), and changes were similar across velocities – contrary to the training specificity theory. Changes in pennation angle were associated with dynamic strength changes. These findings suggest that muscle function adapts to the structural changes induced by training, regardless of the training scheme used.

The authors have declared no competing interest.

This study did not receive any funding

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This study was approved by Edith Cowan University Ethics Committee (2023-04354-NUNES).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors