An AI-driven machine learning approach identifies risk factors associated with 30-day mortality following total aortic arch replacement combined with stent elephant implantation

Abstract

Objectives During emergency surgery, patients with acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) experience unfavorable outcomes throughout their hospital stay. The combination of total aortic arch replacement (TAR) and frozen elephant trunk (FET) implantation has become a dependable choice for surgical treatment. The objective of this research was to utilize a machine learning technique based on artificial intelligence to detect the factors that increase the risk of mortality within 30 days after surgery in patients who undergo TAR in combination with FET.

Methods From January 2015 to December 2020, a total of 640 patients with ATAAD who underwent TAR and FET were included in this study. The subjects were divided into a test group and a validation group in a random manner, with a ratio of 7 to 3. The objective of our research was to create predictive models by employing different supervised machine learning techniques, such as XGBoost, logistic regression, support vector machine (SVM), and random forest (RF), to assess and compare their respective performances. Furthermore, we employed SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) measures to allocate interpretive attributional values.

Results Among all the patients, 37 (5.78%) experienced perioperative mortality. Subsequently, a total 50 of 10 highly associated variables were selected for model construction. By implementing the new method, the AUC value significantly improved from 0.6981 using the XGBoost model to 0.8687 with the PSO-ELM-FLXGBoost model.

Conclusion In this study, machine learning methods were successfully established to predict ATAAD perioperative mortality, enabling the optimization of postoperative treatment strategies to minimize the postoperative complications following cardiac surgeries.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Approval was obtained (no.2020-1402) from the Ethics Committee of Fuwai hospital. The research involved minimal risk to patients, so patient informed consent was not required. The waiver has no negative impact on the participants' rights and well-being.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Data cannot be shared publicly because of data sharing agreements and research ethics board protocols with participating hospitals.. Data are available from the Fuwai hospital Ethics Committee (contact via https://www.fuwai.com/News/Articles/Index/192) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.

Comments (0)

No login
gif