Alterations in starch, sucrose, and abscisic acid metabolism under drought stress in contrasting genotypes of chickpea

AbdElgawad H, Avramova V, Baggerman G, et al. 2020 Starch biosynthesis contributes to the maintenance of photosynthesis and leaf growth under drought stress in maize. Plant Cell Environ. 43 2254–2271

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ahmad F, Gaur PM and Croser J 2005 Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.); in Genetic resources, chromosome engineering and crop improvement-grain legumes (Eds.) RJ Singh and PP Jauhar (Boca Raton: Taylor and Francis Imprint, Inc.) pp 187–217

Akter N, Islam MR, Karim MA, et al. 2014 Alleviation of drought stress in maize by exogenous application of gibberellic acid and cytokinin. J. Crop Sci. Biotech. 17 41–48

Article  Google Scholar 

Albacete A, Cantero-Navarro E, Großkinsky DK, et al. 2015 Ectopic overexpression of the cell wall invertase gene CIN1 leads to dehydration avoidance in tomato. J. Exp. Bot. 66 863–878

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Awasthi R, Gaur P, Turner NC, et al. 2017 Effects of individual and combined heat and drought stress during seed filling on the oxidative metabolism and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes differing in heat and drought tolerance. Crop Pasture Sci. 68 823–841

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Badhan S, Kole P, Ball A, et al. 2018 RNA sequencing of leaf tissues from two contrasting chickpea genotypes reveals mechanisms for drought tolerance. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 129 295–304

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cevik S, Akpinar G, Yildizli A, et al. 2019 Comparative physiological and leaf proteome analysis between drought-tolerant chickpea Cicer reticulatum and drought-sensitive chickpea C. arietinum. J. Biosci. 44 20

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Chae L, Kim T, Nilo-Poyanco R, et al. 2014 Genomic signatures of specialized metabolism in plants. Science 344 510–513

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chen Z, Liu Y, Yin Y, et al. 2019 Expression of AtGA2ox1 enhances drought tolerance in maize. Plant Growth Regul. 89 203–215

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Chomczynski P and Sacchi N 1987 Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal. BioChem. 162 156–159

CAS  Google Scholar 

Chowdhury JA, Karim MA, Khaliq QA, et al. 2017 Effect of drought stress on water relation traits of four soybean genotypes. SAARC J. Agric. 15 163–175

Article  Google Scholar 

Coutinho FS, Santos DS, Lima LL, et al. 2019 Mechanism of the drought tolerance of a transgenic soybean overexpressing the molecular chaperone BiP. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 25 457–472

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Decker D and Kleczkowski LA 2019 UDP-sugar producing pyrophosphorylases: distinct and essential enzymes with overlapping substrate specificities, providing de novo precursors for glycosylation reactions. Front. Plant Sci. 9 1822

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Deokar AA, Kondawar V, Jain PK, et al. 2011 Comparative analysis of expressed sequence tags (ESTs) between drought-tolerant and -susceptible genotypes of chickpea under terminal drought stress. BMC Plant. Biol. 11 70

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Dubois MK 1956 Use of phenol reagent for the determination of total sugar. Anal. Chem. 28 350

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Ende WVD and Rensburg HCJV 2018 UDP-Glucose: a potential signaling molecule in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 8 2230

Fang X, Turner NC, Yan G, et al. 2010 Flower numbers, pod production, pollen viability, and pistil function are reduced and flower and pod abortion increased in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under terminal drought. J. Exp. Bot. 61 335–345

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Farooq M, Ullahb A, Leee DJ, et al. 2018 Desi chickpea genotypes tolerate drought stress better than kabuli types by modulating germination metabolism, trehalose accumulation, and carbon assimilation. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 126 47–54

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Huang J, Tang D, Shen Y, et al. 2010 Activation of gibberellin 2-oxidase 6 decreases active gibberellin levels and creates a dominant semi-dwarf phenotype in rice (Oryza sativa L.). J. Genet. Genomics 37 23–36

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Huang Y, Guo Y, Liu Y, et al. 2018 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase 3 regulates plant growth and enhances multi-abiotic stress tolerance in rice. Front. Plant Sci. 9 162

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hussain M, Malik MA, Farooq M, et al. 2008 Improving drought tolerance by exogenous application of glycinebetaine and salicylic acid in sunflower. J. Agron. Crop. Sci. 194 193–199

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Jain D and Chattopadhyay D 2010 Analysis of gene expression in response to water deficit of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties differing in drought tolerance. BMC Plant. Biol. 10 24

Ji XM, Raveendran M, Oane R, et al. 2005 Tissue-specific expression and drought responsiveness of cell-wall invertase genes of rice at flowering. Plant Mol. Biol. 59 945–964

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ji X, Dong B, Shiran B, et al. 2011 Control of abscisic acid catabolism and abscisic acid homeostasis is important for reproductive stage stress tolerance in cereals. Plant. Physiol. 156 647–662

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kale SM, Jaganathan D, Ruperao P, et al. 2015 Prioritization of candidate genes in “QTL-hotspot” region for drought tolerance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Sci. Rep. 5 15296

Kardile PB, Rakshe MV, Burondkar MM, et al. 2018 Degrees of moisture stress on rate of photosynthesis, rate of transpiration & stomatal conductance in four cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. walp.) genotypes. Int. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 1 3143–3146

Google Scholar 

Kaur S, Gupta AK and Kaur N 2000 Effect of GA3, kinetin and indole acetic acid on carbohydrate metabolism in chickpea seedlings germinating under water stress. J. Plant Growth Regul. 30 61–70

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Kaya C, Tuna AL and Alfredo AA 2006 Gibberellic acid improves water deficit tolerance in maize plants. Acta Physiol. Plant. 28 331–337

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Khan N, Bano A and Zandi P 2018 Effects of exogenously applied plant growth regulators in combination with PGPR on the physiology and root growth of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and their role in drought tolerance. J. Plant Interact. 13 239–247

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Kim JW and Dang CV 2005 Multifaceted roles of glycolytic enzymes. Trends Biochem. Sci. 30 142–150

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kiran A, Sharma PN, Awasthi R, et al. 2021 Disruption of carbohydrate and proline metabolism in anthers under low temperature causes pollen sterility in chickpea. Environ. Exp. Bot. 188 104500

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Kleczkowski LA and Decker D 2015 Sugar activation for production of nucleotide sugars as substrates for glycosyltransferases in plants. J. Appl. Glycosci. 62 25–36

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Krishnamurthy L, Kashiwagi J, Gaur PM, et al. 2010 Sources of tolerance to terminal drought in the chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) minicore germplasm. Field Crops Res. 119 322–330

Article  Google Scholar 

Kumar M, Chauhan AS, Kumar M, et al. 2019 Transcriptome sequencing of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes for identification of drought-responsive genes under drought stress condition. Plant Mol. Bio. Rep. 37 186–203

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Leport L, Turner NC, French RJ, et al. 1999 Physiological responses of chickpea genotypes to terminal drought in a Mediterranean-type environment. Eur. J. Agron. 11 279–291

Article  Google Scholar 

Liu SC, Jin JQ, Ma JQ, et al. 2016 Transcriptomic analysis of tea plant responding to drought stress and recovery. PLoS One 11 e0147306

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD 2001 Analysis of relative gene expression data using real time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT. Methods 25 402–408

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

McCready RM, Guggolz J, Silviera V, et al. 1950 Determination of starch and amylose in vegetables. Anal. Chem. 22 1156–1158

Article  CAS

Comments (0)

No login
gif