Nilsen P, Augustsson H. Implementation strategies and outcomes. In: Nilsen P, editor. Implementation Science: Theory and Application. London: Routledge; 2024. p. 99–113.

Google Scholar 

Proctor EK, Powell BJ, McMillen JC. Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting. Implement Sci. 2013;8:139.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Powell BJ, Proctor EK, Glass JE. A Systematic Review of Strategies for Implementing Empirically Supported Mental Health Interventions. Res Soc Work Pract. 2014;24(2):192–212.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Freemantle N, Grilli R, Grimshaw J, Oxman A. Implementing findings of medical research: the Cochrane Collaboration on Effective Professional Practice. Qual Health Care. 1995;4(1):45–7.

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Powell BJ, McMillen JC, Proctor EK, Carpenter CR, Griffey RT, Bunger AC, Glass JE, York JL. A compilation of strategies for implementing clinical innovations in health and mental health. Med Care Res Rev. 2012;69(2):123–57.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011;6:42.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Fishbein M, Triandis HC, Kanfer FH, Becker M, Middlestadt SE, Eichler A. Factors influencing behavior and behavior change. Handbook of health psychology. 2001;3(1):3–17.

Google Scholar 

Boaz A, Baeza J, Fraser A, Persson E. ‘It depends’: what 86 systematic reviews tell us about what strategies to use to support the use of research in clinical practice. Implement Sci. 2024;19(1):15.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Nathan N, Powell BJ, Shelton RC, Laur CV, Wolfenden L, Hailemariam M, Yoong SL, Sutherland R, Kingsland M, Waltz TJ et al: Do the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) strategies adequately address sustainment? Frontiers in Health Services 2022, Volume 2 - 2022.

Ross AJ, Reedy GB, Roots A, Jaye P, Birns J. Evaluating multisite multiprofessional simulation training for a hyperacute stroke service using the Behaviour Change Wheel. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15:143.

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

McEvoy R, Ballini L, Maltoni S. ODonnell C, Mair F, MacFarlane A: A qualitative systematic review of studies using the normalization process theory to research implementation processes. Implement Sci. 2014;9(1):2.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Huddlestone L, Turner J, Eborall H, Hudson N, Davies M, Martin G. Application of normalisation process theory in understanding implementation processes in primary care settings in the UK: a systematic review. BMC Fam Pract. 2020;21(1):1–16.

Google Scholar 

Price C, Suhomlinova O, Green W. Researching big IT in the UK National Health Service: A systematic review of theory-based studies. Int J Med Inform. 2024;185: 105395.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Leresche E, Hossain M, De Rubeis ML, Hermans V, Burtscher D, Rossi R, Lonsdale C, Singh NS: How is the implementation of empirical research results documented in conflict-affected settings? Findings from a scoping review of peer-reviewed literature. Confl Health 2023, 17(1).

Roach A, Cullinan S, Shafran R, Heyman I, Bennett S. Implementing brief and low-intensity psychological interventions for children and young people with internalizing disorders: a rapid realist review. Br Med Bull. 2023;145(1):120–31.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ataman R, Ahmed S, Zidan A, Thomas A. Understanding How Newly Implemented Rehabilitation Best Practices Are Sustained: A Realist Review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022;103(12):2429–43.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dalkin SM, Hardwick RJ, Haighton CA, Finch TL. Combining Realist approaches and Normalization Process Theory to understand implementation: a systematic review. Implementation Science Communications. 2021;2(1):1–13.

Google Scholar 

May CR, Cummings A, Girling M, Bracher M, Mair FS, May CM, Murray E, Myall M, Rapley T, Finch T. Using Normalization Process Theory in feasibility studies and process evaluations of complex healthcare interventions: a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2018;13(1):80.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Overbeck G, Davidsen AS, Kousgaard MB. Enablers and barriers to implementing collaborative care for anxiety and depression: a systematic qualitative review. Implement Sci. 2016;11(1):165.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Nilsen P: Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implementation Science 2015, 10.

May C, Rapley T, Finch T. Normalization Process Theory. In: Nilsen P, Birken S, editors. International Handbook of Implementation Science. London: Edward Elgar; 2020. p. 144–67.

Google Scholar 

May C, Finch T. Implementing, embedding, and integrating practices: an outline of normalization process theory. Sociology. 2009;43(3):535–54.

Google Scholar 

May CR, Albers B, Bracher M, Finch TL, Gilbert A, Girling M, Greenwood K, MacFarlane A, Mair FS, May CM, et al. Translational framework for implementation evaluation and research: a normalisation process theory coding manual for qualitative research and instrument development. Implement Sci. 2022;17(1):19.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

May CR, Albers B, Desveaux L, Finch TL, Gilbert A, Hillis A, Girling M, Kislov R, MacFarlane A, Mair FS, et al. Translational framework for implementation evaluation and research: Protocol for a qualitative systematic review of studies informed by Normalization Process Theory (NPT) [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. NIHR Open Res. 2022;2:41.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bowers HM, Kendrick T, Glowacka M, Williams S, Leydon G, May C, Dowrick C, Moncrieff J, Laine R, Nestoriuc Y et al: Supporting antidepressant discontinuation: The development and optimisation of a digital intervention for patients in UK primary care using a theory, evidence and person-based approach. Bmj Open 2020, 10(3).

May C. A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6(86):1–11.

Google Scholar 

May C, Finch T, Mair F, Ballini L, Dowrick C, Eccles M, Gask L, MacFarlane A, Murray E, Rapley T et al: Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: the normalization process model. Bmc Health Services Research 2007, 7(148).

May CR, Mair FS, Dowrick CF, Finch TL: Process evaluation for complex interventions in primary care: understanding trials using the normalization process model. BMC Family Practice 2007, 8.

May C, Finch T. Implementation, embedding, and integration: an outline of Normalization Process Theory. Sociology. 2009;43(3):535–54.

Google Scholar 

May C, Mair FS, Finch T, MacFarlane A, Dowrick C, Treweek S, Rapley T, Ballini L, Ong BN, Rogers A et al: Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory. Implementation Science 2009, 4(29).

May C. Agency and implementation: Understanding the embedding of healthcare innovations in practice. Soc Sci Med. 2013;78:26–33.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

May C. Towards a general theory of implementation. Implement Sci. 2013;8(1):18.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Murray E, Treweek S, Pope C, MacFarlane A, Ballini L, Dowrick C, Finch T, Kennedy A, Mair F, O’Donnell C, et al. Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions. BMC Med. 2010;8(1):63.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Finch TL, Rapley T, Girling M, Mair FS, Murray E, Treweek S, McColl E, Steen IN, May CR: Improving the normalization of complex interventions: measure development based on normalization process theory (NoMAD): study protocol. Implementation Science 2013, 8.

Finch T, Mair F, O’Donnell C, Murray E, May C: From theory to 'measurement' in complex interventions: Methodological lessons from the development of an e-health normalisation instrument. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2012, 12(69).

May C, Finch T, Ballini L, MacFarlane A, Mair F, Murray E, Treweek S, Rapley T. Evaluating Complex Interventions and Health Technologies Using Normalization Process Theory: Development of a Simplified Approach and Web-Enabled Toolkit. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11(1):245.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Veritas Health Innovation M, Australia. : Covidence systematic review software https://www.covidence.org. In.; 2021.

Programm CAS: CASP Qualitative Checklist. [online] Available at: https://casp-uk.net/. Accessed: 14 Feb 2022. In.; 2018.

Kislov R. Engaging with theory: from theoretically informed to theoretically informative improvement research. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019;28(3):177–9.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kislov R, Pope C, Martin GP, Wilson PM. Harnessing the power of theorising in implementation science. Implement Sci. 2019;14(1):103.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Schreier M: Qualitative content analysis in practice. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2012.

Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldaña J: Qualitative data analysis : a methods sourcebook, Fourth edition. edn. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2020.

May C, Montori VM, Mair FS: We need minimally disruptive medicine. BMJ 2009, 339(aug11_2):b2803-.

Czarniawska B: A theory of organizing: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2008.

Ankersen PV, Steffensen RG, Blaehr EE, Beedholm K: Bumpy road: implementing integrated psychiatric and somatic care in joint-specialty emergency departments: a mixed-method study using Normalization Process Theory. Journal of Integrated Care 2021.

Blickem C, Kennedy A, Jariwala P, Morris R, Bowen R, Vassilev I, Brooks H, Blakeman T, Rogers A: Aligning everyday life priorities with people’s self-management support networks: an exploration of the work and implementation of a needs-led telephone support system. BMC Health Services Research 2014, 14.

Burau V, Carstensen K, Fredens M, Kousgaard MB: Exploring drivers and challenges in implementation of health promotion in community mental health services: a qualitative multi-site case study using Normalization Process Theory. BMC Health Services Research 2018, 18.

French B, Thomas LH, Harrison J, Burton CR, Forshaw D, Booth J, Britt D, Cheater FM, Roe B, Watkins CL. Implementing a Systematic Voiding Program for Patients with Urinary Incontinence after Stroke. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(10):1393–408.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gibson J, Lightbody E, McLoughlin A, McAdam J, Gibson A, Day E, Fitzgerald J, May C, Price C, Emsley H, et al. "It was like he was in the room with us’: patients’ and carers’ perspectives of telemedicine in acute stroke. Health Expect. 2016;19(1):98–111.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hall A, Finch T, Kolehmainen N, James D: Implementing a video-based intervention to empower staff members in an autism care organization: a qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research 2016, 16.

Herber OR, Ehringfeld I, Steinhoff P, Whittal A: Identifying relevant factors for successful implementation into routine practice: expert interviews to inform a heart failure self-care intervention (ACHIEVE study). BMC Health Services Research 2021, 21(1).

Hind D, Parkin J, Whitworth V, Rex S, Young T, Hampson L, Sheehan J, Maguire C, Cantrill H, Scott E et al: Aquatic therapy for children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a pilot feasibility randomised controlled trial and mixed-methods process evaluation. Health Technology Assessment 2017, 21(27):I-+.

Holopainen R, Piirainen A, Karppinen J, Linton SJ, O’Sullivan P: An adventurous learning journey. Physiotherapists’ conceptions of learning and integrating cognitive functional therapy into clinical practice. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 2020.

Jeffries M, Salema NE, Laing L, Shamsuddin A, Sheikh A, Avery A, Chuter A, Waring J, Keers RN: The implementation, use and sustainability of a clinical decision support system for medication optimisation in primary care: A qualitative evaluation. Plos One 2021, 16(5).

Keenan J, Poland F, Boote J, Howe A, Wythe H, Varley A, Vicary P, Irvine L, Wellings A: 'We're passengers sailing in the same ship, but we have our own berths to sleep in': Evaluating patient and public involvement within a regional research programme: An action research project informed by Normalisation Process Theory. Plos One 2019, 14(5).

Kennedy A, Rogers A, Bowen R, Lee V, Blakeman T, Gardner C, Morris R, Protheroe J, Chew-Graham C. Implementing, embedding and integrating self-management support tools for people with long-term conditions in primary care nursing: A qualitative study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2014;51(8):1103–13.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kennedy A, Rogers A, Chew-Graham C, Blakeman T, Bowen R, Gardner C, Lee V, Morris R, Protheroe J: Implementation of a self-management support approach (WISE) across a health system: a process evaluation explaining what did and did not work for organisations, clinicians and patients. Implementation Science 2014, 9.

Knowles S, Cotterill S, Coupe N, Spence M: Referral of patients to diabetes prevention programmes from community campaigns and general practices: mixed-method evaluation using the RE-AIM framework and Normalisation Process Theory. BMC Health Services Research 2019, 19.

Knowles SE, Ercia A, Caskey F, Rees M, Farrington K, Van der Veer SN. Participatory co-design and normalisation process theory with staff and patients to implement digital ways of working into routine care: the example of electronic patient-reported outcomes in UK renal services. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(1):1–11.

Google Scholar 

Leitch S, Smith A, Crengle S, Stokes T. The views of New Zealand general practitioners and patients on a proposed risk assessment and communication tool: a qualitative study using Normalisation Process Theory. Implement Sci Commun. 2021;2(1):16.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ling T, Brereton L, Conklin A, Newbould J, Roland M: Barriers and facilitators to integrating care: experiences from the English Integrated Care Pilots. International Journal of Integrated Care 2012, 12.

McCrorie C, Benn J, Johnson OA, Scantlebury A: Staff expectations for the implementation of an electronic health record system: a qualitative study using normalisation process theory. Bmc Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2019, 19(1).

Nicoll A, Maxwell M, Williams B. Achieving “coherence” in routine practice: a qualitative case-based study to describe speech and language therapy interventions with implementation in mind. Implement Sci Commun. 2021;2(1):56.