Aflatoonian A, Eftekhar M, Mohammadian F, Yousefnejad F. Outcome of assisted reproductive technology in women aged 40 years and older. Iran J Reprod Med. 2011;9(4):281–4.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Irani M, Zaninovic N, Rosenwaks Z, Xu K. Does maternal age at retrieval influence the implantation potential of euploid blastocysts? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;220(4):379. e1- e7.

Google Scholar 

Demko ZP, Simon AL, McCoy RC, Petrov DA, Rabinowitz M. Effects of maternal age on euploidy rates in a large cohort of embryos analyzed with 24-chromosome single-nucleotide polymorphism-based preimplantation genetic screening. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(5):1307–13.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Prevention CfDCa. Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Data: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2021 [updated September 11 2024. Available from: https://nccd.cdc.gov/drh_art/rdPage.aspx

Noci I, Borri P, Chieffi O, Scarselli G, Biagiotti R, Moncini D, et al. I. Aging of the human endometrium: a basic morphological and immunohistochemical study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1995;63(2):181–5.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Batista MC, Cartledge TP, Zellmer AW, Merino MJ, Axiotis C, Bremner WJ, Nieman LK. Effects of aging on menstrual cycle hormones and endometrial maturation. Fertil Steril. 1995;64(3):492–9.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Engels V, Sanfrutos L, Perez-Medina T, Alvarez P, Zapardiel I, Bueno B, et al. Evaluation of endometrial and subendometrial vascularization and endometrial volume by 3-D power doppler ultrasound and its relationship with age and pregnancy in intrauterine insemination cycles. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2011;72(2):117–22.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Devesa-Peiro A, Sebastian-Leon P, Parraga-Leo A, Pellicer A, Diaz-Gimeno P. Breaking the ageing paradigm in endometrium: endometrial gene expression related to cilia and ageing hallmarks in women over 35 years. Hum Reprod. 2022;37(4):762–76.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kalakota NR, George LC, Morelli SS, Douglas NC, Babwah AV. Towards an improved Understanding of the effects of elevated progesterone levels on human endometrial receptivity and oocyte/embryo quality during assisted reproductive technologies. Cells. 2022;11(9).

Pereira N, Rosenwaks Z. A fresh(er) perspective on frozen embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(2):257–8.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Casper RF. Frozen embryo transfer: evidence-based markers for successful endometrial Preparation. Fertil Steril. 2020;113(2):248–51.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Liu KE, Hartman M, Hartman A, Luo ZC, Mahutte N. The impact of a thin endometrial lining on fresh and frozen-thaw IVF outcomes: an analysis of over 40 000 embryo transfers. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(10):1883–8.

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Shaodi Z, Qiuyuan L, Yisha Y, Cuilian Z. The effect of endometrial thickness on pregnancy outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles which underwent hormone replacement therapy. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(9):e0239120.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Shalom-Paz E, Atia N, Atzmon Y, Hallak M, Shrim A. The effect of endometrial thickness and pattern on the success of frozen embryo transfer cycles and gestational age accuracy. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2021;37(5):428–32.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kasius A, Smit JG, Torrance HL, Eijkemans MJ, Mol BW, Opmeer BC, Broekmans FJ. Endometrial thickness and pregnancy rates after IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20(4):530–41.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

He T, Li M, Li W, Meng P, Xue X, Shi J. Endometrial thickness is associated with low birthweight in frozen embryo transfer cycles: A retrospective cohort study of 8,235 Singleton newborns. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022;13:929617.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hu KL, Kawai A, Hunt S, Li W, Li X, Zhang R, et al. Endometrial thickness in the prediction of neonatal adverse outcomes in frozen cycles for Singleton pregnancies. Reprod Biomed Online. 2021;43(3):553–60.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jing S, Li X, Zhang S, Gong F, Lu G, Lin G. The risk of placenta previa and Cesarean section associated with a thin endometrial thickness: a retrospective study of 5251 Singleton births during frozen embryo transfer in China. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019;300(5):1227–37.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tian H, Zhang H, Qiu H, Yang X, La X, Cui L. Influence of maternal age on the relationship between endometrial thickness and ongoing pregnancy rates in Frozen-Thawed embryo transfer cycles: A retrospective analysis of 2,562 cycles. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022;13:821753.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Baird DT, Collins J, Egozcue J, Evers LH, Gianaroli L, Leridon H, et al. Fertility and ageing. Hum Reprod Update. 2005;11(3):261–76.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gruhn JR, Zielinska AP, Shukla V, Blanshard R, Capalbo A, Cimadomo D, et al. Chromosome errors in human eggs shape natural fertility over reproductive life span. Science. 2019;365(6460):1466–9.

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ruth KS, Day FR, Hussain J, Martinez-Marchal A, Aiken CE, Azad A, et al. Genetic insights into biological mechanisms governing human ovarian ageing. Nature. 2021;596(7872):393–7.

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

te Velde ER, Pearson PL. The variability of female reproductive ageing. Hum Reprod Update. 2002;8(2):141–54.

Google Scholar 

Gook DA, Edgar DH. Cryopreservation of female reproductive potential. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;55:23–36.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gulimiheranmu M, Wang X, Zhou J. Advances in female germ cell induction from pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells Int. 2021;2021:8849230.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Deryabin P, Griukova A, Nikolsky N, Borodkina A. The link between endometrial stromal cell senescence and decidualization in female fertility: the Art of balance. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2020;77(7):1357–70.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vitagliano A, Paffoni A, Vigano P. Does maternal age affect assisted reproduction technology success rates after euploid embryo transfer? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2023;120(2):251–65.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Williams RS, Ellis DD, Wilkinson EA, Kramer JM, Datta S, Guzick DS. Factors affecting live birth rates in donor oocytes from commercial egg banks vs. program egg donors: an analysis of 40,485 cycles from the society for assisted reproductive technology registry in 2016–2018. Fertil Steril. 2022;117(2):339–48.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Griesinger G, Trevisan S, Cometti B. Endometrial thickness on the day of embryo transfer is a poor predictor of IVF treatment outcome. Hum Reprod Open. 2018;2018(1):hox031.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Mathyk B, Schwartz A, DeCherney A, Ata B. A critical appraisal of studies on endometrial thickness and embryo transfer outcome. Reprod Biomed Online. 2023;47(4):103259.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Schmiech K, Li M, Chen LX, Dow MP, Baker VL. Association of endometrial thickness with live birth rate: a study using the society for assisted reproductive technology clinic outcome reporting system. Fertil Steril. 2025;124(1):79–87.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gao G, Cui X, Li S, Ding P, Zhang S, Zhang Y. Endometrial thickness and IVF cycle outcomes: a meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020;40(1):124–33.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ata B, Linan A, Kalafat E, Ruiz F, Melado L, Bayram A, et al. Effect of the endometrial thickness on the live birth rate: insights from 959 single euploid frozen embryo transfers without a cutoff for thickness. Fertil Steril. 2023;120(1):91–8.

PubMed  Google Scholar