Introduction

The development of new fluorination methodologies is driven largely by the beneficial effects of including fluorine into bioactive molecules. These advantages include the modulation of potency, bioavailability and physical properties of drug and agrochemical compounds . The significance of fluorination is reflected in the fact that a large number of agrochemicals contain fluorine, and that almost a quarter of drug molecules approved by the FDA between 2018 and 2022 contained at least one fluorine atom, for example belzutifan and quinofumelin, Figure 1A .

Figure 1: A) Benzylic fluorides in bioactive compounds, with B) the relative BDEs of different benzylic C–H bonds reported in kcal mol−1.

The fluorination of functionalised carbon centres is a reliable strategy to incorporate fluorine into compounds of interest, with regio and site selectivity pre-determined by the nature of the functionalised carbon. However, the development of C(sp3)–H fluorination methods represents a more sustainable and versatile approach, as there is no requirement to pre-functionalise the compound, carry that functional group through synthesis and also protect any potentially labile group that would otherwise displace during the installation of the fluorine atom . Therefore, methodologies for the selective C–H fluorination represent a valuable class of reactions , for which several have been disclosed in the chemical literature .

Benzylic C(sp3)–H bonds are comparatively weaker compared to unactivated C(sp3)–H bonds, with bond dissociation enthalpies (BDEs) falling in the range of 76–90 kcal mol−1 (Figure 1B), due to the increased stability of benzylic radicals and ions imparted through delocalisation with the adjacent π-system . In general, the more stabilised the benzylic radical, the weaker the C(sp3)–H bond, as demonstrated when considering the BDEs of a series of phenyl-substituted methanes (Figure 1B). The changes in BDE correlate with the relative stability of primary, secondary and tertiary benzylic radicals and cations. As a result, the presence of benzylic C(sp3)–H bonds in bioactive molecules can be problematic as they are particularly labile to enzymatic oxidation , and hence, their functionalisation has become a strategy to overcome this . For this reason, the fluorination of benzylic C(sp3)–H bonds has become particularly important in biologically relevant situations. Benzylic C(sp3)–H bonds are also present in a large portion of commercially available building blocks, highlighting the appeal for benzylic C(sp3)–H functionalisation reactions in drug-discovery campaigns . Although much is unknown about the precise details, several benzylic fluorides have been reported to be unstable, which is an effect that is apparently dependent on the substitution of the ring. While primary benzylic fluorides are predominately considered to be stable to isolation conditions, secondary and tertiary suffer from the elimination of HF, especially in the presence of silica gel or glass vessels. Therefore, benzyl fluorides have been derivatised, for example in C–O, C–N and C–C bond-forming reactions , thereby also demonstrating their suitability, as precursors for further functionalisation.

Reviews on the broad area of C–H fluorination have been written with the focus varying, for example between aliphatic fluorination , α-fluorination of carbonyl compounds , photosensitised C–H fluorination , recent advances and mechanistic approaches . Examples of specifically benzylic C(sp3)–H fluorination reactions are included into many of these reports, as well as in sections of reviews with a much broader scope , and alternative routes to benzylic fluorides have also been reviewed, such as through deoxyfluorination, C–X fluorination, or decarboxylative fluorination . However, a comprehensive review that focusses specifically on benzylic C–H bonds is still currently missing in the literature. Therefore, we aim to cover reports that focus specifically on benzylic C(sp3)–H fluorination, emphasising the most recent protocols but with also some historical context. We also signpost readers to reports where benzylic C–H fluorination has been included, but is not the focus of the work. We have organised the review into different mechanistic strategies, namely, electrophilic, radical and nucleophilic approaches, and highlighted when emerging technologies, such as photo- and electrochemistry effect the desired transformation .

Review Electrophilic benzylic C(sp3)–H fluorination Base mediated

Electrophilic fluorinating reagents have been used to effect the transformation of benzylic C(sp3)–H to C(sp3)–F bonds . Shreeve and co-workers reported the use of KOH or n-BuLi to deprotonate acidic protons at benzylic positions adjacent to electron-withdrawing nitro or nitrile groups, respectively, generating benzylic anions that subsequently attack electrophilic Selectfluor to afford the benzyl fluoride (Figure 2) . The methodology was demonstrated on eight para-substituted benzylic substrates. The authors noted that resubjecting the monofluorinated compound 1 to the same reaction conditions afforded the difluorinated compound 2 in good yield. The requirement of adjacent to nitro or nitrile groups limits the scope of this approach. Furthermore, the use of strong bases, particularly n-BuLi, prevents the application of this methodology on any substrate bearing sensitive functional groups.

Figure 2: Base-mediated benzylic fluorination with Selectfluor.

An analogous method for monofluorination of tertiary benzylic C(sp3)–H bonds adjacent to nitro groups was reported by Loghmani-Khouzani and co-workers in 2006, in which ammonium acetate and Selectfluor were employed under sonochemical conditions to effect the fluorination (Figure 3) . The authors noted that the use of sonochemistry afforded higher yields and shorter reaction times compared to standard stirring conditions with DBU. When employing substrates bearing secondary benzylic sites in the reaction conditions, the difluorinated products were observed exclusively in high yields.

Figure 3: Sonochemical base-mediated benzylic fluorination with Selectfluor.

In 2016, Britton and co-workers reported a method for the efficient monofluorination of 4- and 2-alkylpyridines (Figure 4 – conditions [A]) . The transformation relied on the polarisation of the heterobenzylic C–H bond, via the intermediate formation of an N-sulphonylpyridinium salt, to promote deprotonation. Following a polar mechanism with excess NFSI, the heterobenzyl fluoride is obtained. In the case of product 3, the authors suggested that the absence of radical clock rearrangement products supported a polar mechanism. Conveniently, when both benzylic and heterobenzylic C–H bonds were present in a substrate, the reaction was selective for the heterobenzylic position, as shown by compound 4. In 2018, a subsequent publication by the same group detailed the use of increased lithium carbonate and NFSI loadings (conditions [B]) to access the difluorinated products . This report also demonstrated a single example of 18F monofluorination radiolabelling using [18F]NFSI.

Figure 4: Mono- and difluorination of nitrogen-containing heteroaromatic benzylic substrates.

Electrophilic fluorination of benzylic C–H bonds has been demonstrated as a powerful approach. However, these techniques can be constrained to defined substrate classes and the requirement of using strong bases.

Palladium catalysis

Palladium-catalysed chemistry is pervasive in organic synthesis and can also be used to efficiently fluorinate benzylic C(sp3)–H bonds. The general blueprint for this transformation follows a metal insertion into the C(sp3)–H bond followed by C–F reductive elimination .

In 2006, Sanford and co-workers published a seminal and pioneering report into palladium(II)/(IV)-catalysed C–H fluorination of 8-methylquinolines using N-fluoro-2,4,6-trimethylpyridinium tetrafluoroborate as an electrophilic “F+” source under microwave conditions (Figure 5) . Benzylic fluorination was achieved in good yields on three examples, each bearing different functional groups at the 5-position.

Figure 5: Palladium-catalysed benzylic C–H fluorination with N-fluoro-2,4,6-trimethylpyridinium tetrafluoroborate.

The Shi group reported the use of Pd(II) and Selectfluor to enable the enantioselective β-fluorination of α-amino acids (Figure 6) . The presence of 2-(pyridin-2-yl)isopropylamine (PIP) as directing group was essential for the formation of a four-coordinate palladacycle intermediate, defining the stereochemical outcome. Subsequent oxidation to the Pd(IV)–F species, which triggered reductive elimination, afforded the fluorinated product. The non-innocent behaviour of the isobutyrylnitrile co-solvent aided in stabilising the palladacycle through occupying the vacant coordination site. By installing a cleavable directing group, the authors were able to extend the scope reported by Sanford and co-workers outside of 8-aminoquinoline substrates. Multiple electron-donating and withdrawing groups on the ring were tolerated, including the pinacolborane group; however, the methodology was only shown on secondary benzylic positions.

Figure 6: Palladium-catalysed, PIP-directed benzylic C(sp3)–H fluorination of α-amino acids and proposed mechanism.

The stereoselective benzylic monofluorination of α-amino acids was also reported by Yu and co-workers, employing a similar directing group strategy (Figure 7) . The use of the monodentate directing group 2,3,5,6-tetrafluoro-4-(trifluoromethyl)aniline in conjunction with external ligand 5 facilitated the formation of a series of fluorinated α-amino acids.

Figure 7: Palladium-catalysed monodentate-directed benzylic C(sp3)–H fluorination of α-amino acids.

Xu and co-workers also disclosed a palladium-catalysed protocol for the fluorination of simple benzylic substrates bearing a bidentate directing group (Figure 8) . Yields varied from 61–75% across a series of nine benzylic substrates with various substitution patterns on the aromatic ring.

Figure 8: Palladium-catalysed bidentate-directed benzylic C(sp3)–H fluorination.

In 2018, Yu and co-workers reported a palladium-catalysed enantioselective fluorination of benzylic C(sp3)–H bonds with the use of a transient chiral directing group 6 . This approach was effective for the stereoselective fluorination of benzylic positions ortho to aldehyde substituents (Figure 9). The choice of a bulky amino, transient, directing group dictated the stereochemical outcome and promoted the C–F reductive elimination through an inner-sphere pathway. A competitive C–O bond formation to afford the acyloxylation product was observed, and favoured when using directing groups with less steric bulk. This product had the opposite stereochemistry to the fluorination product suggesting it occurred via a competitive SN2 pathway. This is supported by the selectivity for C–O bond formation for substrates bearing primary benzylic positions, attributed to the faster rate of SN2 at the less hindered carbon. The scope was limited to substrates bearing secondary benzylic sites, with various functional groups tolerated. However, substrates bearing electron-donating substituents on the arene were unsuccessful. Without substituents on the ring, aryl C–H activation and subsequent C–O bond formation occurred along with benzylic fluorination (7) (low efficiency). The presence of a p-methoxy group resulted in a switch in selectivity to acyloxylation 8’ as the major product. The authors displayed the stability of the secondary benzyl fluoride 9 to various SNAr conditions.

Figure 9: Palladium-catalysed benzylic fluorination using a transient directing group approach. Ratio refers to fluorination (red) vs oxygenation (blue) product.

While these methods demonstrate excellent application of palladium catalysts to perform benzylic fluorinations, the need to install a directing group can limit substrate scope. Therefore, methods that can achieve the same transformation in the absence of a directing group are particularly attractive.

Radical benzylic C(sp3)–H fluorination

Radical fluorination techniques are an attractive approach for benzylic C–H fluorinations that are shown to proceed without a directing group. Carbon-centred radical generation at the benzylic position is known to occur via multiple pathways . These radicals can then undergo fluorination via fluorine-atom-transfer (FAT) with various reagents capable of SET pathways, such as Selectfluor and NFSI (Figure 10) . By avoiding the need for strong bases and directing group strategies, this approach opens the door to fluorinating a wider range of benzylic substrates.

Figure 10: Outline for benzylic C(sp3)–H fluorination via radical intermediates.

Metal catalysed

In 2013, Lectka and co-workers reported an iron(II)-catalysed benzylic fluorination with Selectfluor (Figure 11) . The authors were able to use an inexpensive iron source to promote the fluorination of a range of primary and secondary benzylic substrates that were not too electron-rich nor too electron-poor. Interestingly, selectivity for the benzylic position was observed over α-halogenation in substrates bearing carbonyl groups (41% yield for 10). The conditions were selective for primary benzylic fluorination (11) and secondary benzylic fluorination (12) in the presence of tertiary benzylic sites. Although no mechanism has been proposed, the authors concluded it likely proceeded via a radical pathway .

Figure 11: Iron(II)-catalysed radical benzylic C(sp3)–H fluorination using Selectfluor.

In 2017, Baxter and co-workers introduced a silver-catalysed benzylic fluorination method that employed unprotected amino acids as radical precursors, Figure 12 . Oxidation of glycine by Ag(II) promotes decarboxylation and results in the α-amino radical, which performs a HAT on the benzylic substrate to furnish the benzylic radical. This subsequently undergoes FAT with Selectfluor to produce the desired benzyl fluoride. Increasing amino acid and Selectfluor loadings achieved difluorination of the benzylic substrates. This procedure was demonstrated predominately on primary benzylic substrates, but could be used to effect the fluorination of several secondary and tertiary substrates too.

Figure 12: Silver and amino acid-mediated benzylic fluorination.

In 2012, Lectka reported a fluorination of mostly aliphatic C–H bonds that used a molecularly defined copper catalyst with a bis imine ligand, along with co-catalytic N-hydroxyphthalimide and a phase-transfer catalyst . Although only a few benzylic substrates were shown, this report provided important precedent for the ability of copper fluoride species to deliver fluorine to carbon radicals. Following on from this, Stahl and co-workers reported in 2020 an efficient synthesis of secondary and tertiary benzyl fluorides via a copper-catalysed radical relay mechanism. Excess NFSI functioned as both a fluorine source and HAT reagent precursor (Figure 13) . Fluorine abstraction from NFSI by copper(I) generates an N-centred radical that is selective for benzylic C(sp3)–H bonds , affording the benzylic radical via HAT. Subsequent FAT with the in situ-generated Cu(II)F or NFSI affords the benzyl fluoride. Substrates bearing secondary and tertiary benzylic sites were successful in the reaction. However, primary benzylic substrates were not tolerated, instead affording the N(SO2Ph)2 adduct (e.g., product 13) in moderate yields. The authors noted that several secondary and tertiary benzyl fluorides were unstable to silica during isolation or storage in glass vessels, and therefore, demonstrated several downstream diversifications of the benzyl fluorides.

Figure 13: Copper-catalysed radical benzylic C(sp3)–H fluorination using NFSI.

Sevov, Zhang and co-workers reported in 2023 a stable copper(III) fluoride complex that was capable of C(sp3)–H activation and fluorination, including on one tertiary and five secondary benzylic substrates (Figure 14) . This work utilised electrochemical oxidation with a nucleophilic source of fluoride, CsF, to regenerate the trisligated copper(III) fluoride complex.

Figure 14: Copper-catalysed C(sp3)–H fluorination of benzylic substrates with electrochemical catalyst regeneration. Yields are NMR yields quoted vs copper catalyst.

In 2016, Silas reported an intramolecular fluorine-atom-transfer (FAT) from an N-fluorinated amide to a pendant carbon-based radical formed from an iron catalyst (Figure 15) . This concept of fluorine transfer through a 6-membered transition state was shown to work efficiently from primary, as well as secondary, benzylic radicals that have an ortho-substituted tert-butylamide moiety.

Figure 15: Iron-catalysed intramolecular fluorine-atom-transfer from N–F amides.

Finally, while not focussing on benzylic substrates, a vanadium-mediated fluorination of aliphatic C–H bonds was reported by Chen and co-workers, which also included five benzylic substrates (Figure 16) .

Figure 16: Vanadium-catalysed benzylic fluorination with Selectfluor.

Metal free

Numerous reports have detailed metal-free radical C(sp3)–H fluorinations suitable for benzylic substrates. These typically involve the generation of a HAT reagent that is selective for benzylic C–H bonds and facilitates the generation of a benzylic radical. Subsequent FAT, from a fluorinating reagent, yields the desired benzyl fluorides. In 2013, Inoue and co-workers demonstrated the use of catalytic N,N-dihydroxypyromellitimide (NDHPI) as a precursor for N-oxyl radicals that serve as the HAT reagent. Selectfluor was employed as the FAT reagent, generating an N-centred radical on the spent Selectfluor that can regenerate the N-oxyl radicals from NDHPI (Figure 17) . The secondary and tertiary substrates selected were shown to undergo this transformation in moderate to good yields.

Figure 17: NDHPI-catalysed radical benzylic C(sp3)–H fluorination with Selectfluor.

The Yi group published a complementary method using stoichiometric potassium persulfate as the HAT reagent precursor (Figure 18) . The authors proposed that under heating K2S2O8 decomposed to SO4•− which could then abstract the benzylic hydrogen to generate the benzylic radical. Fluorine-atom-transfer with Selectfluor then afforded the benzyl fluoride. Other fluorinating reagents such as NFSI or DAST did not perform as well. By varying the loadings of K2S2O8 and Selectfluor, selectivity for the mono- (conditions A) or difluorination (conditions B) products could be achieved.

Figure 18: Potassium persulfate-mediated radical benzylic C(sp3)–H fluorination with Selectfluor.

Building on their previous iron-catalysed work, Figure 11, Lectka and co-workers reported in 2014 the use of triethylborane as a radical chain initiator for C(sp3)–H fluorination. They demonstrated this reaction primarily on alkyl substrates, but 5 secondary benzylic substrates were also shown to undergo the reaction effectively (Figure 19) . The authors proposed the transformation occurred via established triethylborane autoxidation initiation and propagation methods, noting the importance of high purity reagents and the presence of O2.

Figure 19: Benzylic fluorination using triethylborane as a radical chain initiator.

Radical fluorination of hetereobenzylic C(sp3)–H bonds was demonstrated by Van Humbeck and co-workers in 2018, who enabled the fluorination of aza-heterocycles at the benzylic position using Selectfluor (Figure 20) . The authors proposed the formation of a charge-transfer complex between the heterocycle and Selectfluor, capable of promoting an ET/PT or PCET pathway to furnish the carbon-centred radical at the heterobenzylic position. Fluorine-atom-transfer with Selectfluor then afforded the desired product. Secondary and tertiary substrates worked well under the reaction conditions, whereas primary positions afforded low yields (14). No additive was required to achieve the desired selectivity, but in some cases the addition of small amounts of iron salt [FeCl4][FeCl2(dmf)3] improved yields.

Figure 20: Heterobenzylic C(sp3)–H radical fluorination with Selectfluor.

In 2022, Pieber and co-workers reported a benzylic fluorination of phenylacetic acids via a charge-transfer complex (Figure 21) . The authors proposed that the combination of Selectfluor and DMAP spontaneously produced the Selectfluor radical dication (TEDA2+•), which served as a radical chain carrier capable of facilitating HAT to produce a benzylic radical. Fluorine-atom-transfer (FAT) with Selectfluor then gave the benzyl fluoride. The low acidity of phenylacetic acids in polar aprotic solvents disfavoured decarboxylation (via an SET pathway) promoting HAT from the benzylic position. By using a mixture of 1:1 MeCN/H2O and heating, the decarboxylation pathway could be enabled to afford primary benzyl fluorides.

Figure 21: Benzylic fluorination of phenylacetic acids via a charge-transfer complex. NMR yields in parentheses.

In the same year, Barham and co-workers also showed that the radical dication TEDA2+• was capable of HAT on unactivated C(sp3)–H, enabling fluorination at these positions . This work utilised para-fluorobenzoates as both photocatalysts or photo-auxiliaries and was demonstrated on a number of benzylic examples.

Photochemical

Photochemical methods have proven to be powerful tools in the generation of reactive intermediates, including benzylic radicals . Oxidative photochemical functionalisation of benzylic C–H bonds to benzylic radicals can be envisaged to occur through three different pathways (Figure 22). Upon excitation by light, photoredox reagents can induce a number of changes in benzylic substrate I, either directly or via mediated processes. Hydrogen-atom-transfer (HAT) results in the concerted transfer of an electron and a proton from the benzylic substrate resulting in the benzylic radical II – pathway [A] . This radical can also be accessed via sequential oxidative single-electron-transfer (SET) and proton-transfer (PT) steps (pathway [B]), or concerted proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) (pathway [C]). Benzylic radicals can then react with FAT reagents to give the desired benzyl fluoride products .

Figure 22: Oxidative radical photochemical benzylic C(sp3)–H strategies.

Several photochemical benzylic fluorination methodologies proposed to proceed via radical pathways have been reported. Chen and co-workers published a pioneering report in 2013 that used photocatalyst 9-fluorenone under visible-light irradiation to generate a photoexcited aryl ketone, capable of HAT to promote benzylic fluorination with Selectfluor (Figure 23) . The reaction tolerated an exceptional range of functional groups and enabled the fluorination of primary, secondary and tertiary benzylic substrates. The methodology was amenable to scale up, demonstrating the gram-scale synthesis of product 15 in 85% yield.

Figure 23: 9-Fluorenone-catalysed photochemical radical benzylic fluorination with Selectfluor.

The authors recognised the difficulty in sequential fluorination and noted that the use of a more electron-rich photocatalyst would be required to promote hydrogen abstraction. By changing the photocatalyst to xanthone and replacing Selectfluor with 3 equivalents of Selectfluor II, the authors afforded gem-difluoride products of primary and secondary benzylic substrates in high yields (Figure 24).

Figure 24: Xanthone-photocatalysed radical benzylic fluorination with Selectfluor II.

In 2014, Lectka and co-workers showed that 1,2,4,5-tetracyanobenzene could be used under ultraviolet light irradiation as a photocatalyst in the fluorination of benzylic C(sp3)–H bonds (Figure 25) . Selectfluor was used as the FAT reagent to furnish a selection of primary, secondary and tertiary benzyl fluorides with different functional groups on the aromatic ring and adjacent to the benzylic position. Mechanistic investigations suggested an initial electron transfer to generate a radical cation en route to the intermediate benzylic radical, rather than a HAT process, however, the authors did not distinguish between a stepwise SET and subsequent PT or concerted PCET mechanism. The yields observed using this approach were broadly similar to the same group’s iron-catalysed method (Figure 11).

Figure 25: 1,2,4,5-Tetracyanobenzene-photocatalysed radical benzylic fluorination with Selectfluor.

In the same year, Cantillo, de Frutos, Kappe and co-workers reported a similar approach, using xanthone as their photocatalyst in a continuous flow system (Figure 26) . The authors were able to demonstrate rapid benzylic fluorination of 13 substrates, requiring residence times below 30 min.

Figure 26: Xanthone-catalysed benzylic fluorination in continuous flow.

The use of photoexcited aryl ketones was further expanded in 2016 by Lectka and co-workers who reported the use of 5-dibenzosuberenone as a photosensitive arylketone catalyst in the fluorination of phenylalanine residues in peptides (Figure 27) . This work demonstrated high yields and selectivity for peptides bearing phenylalanine residues, including tripeptides, such as 16.

Figure 27: Photochemical phenylalanine fluorination in peptides.

In 2015, Britton and co-workers reported a photochemical HAT-guided approach using NFSI as their fluorine source . The authors demonstrated the use of a decatungstate photocatalyst as a species capable of hydrogen-atom abstraction and use it to access a range of secondary and tertiary benzyl fluorides in moderate to excellent yields. AIBN was also demonstrated as a suitable radical initiator for this transformation, albeit in reduced yields. Interestingly, for substrates bearing both primary and secondary benzylic C(sp3)–H bonds, AIBN exhibited selectivity for the primary position and the opposite was seen for the decatungstate catalyst (Figure 28). The authors attributed this to the increased solubility and concentration of NFSI in the AIBN conditions, which were performed at elevated temperatures, promoting facile trapping of a primary radical. In contrast, the decatungstate conditions, which operated at room temperature where NFSI is not completely dissolved and is therefore not as concentrated in solution, allows for equilibration between benzylic radicals towards the more stable secondary radical. This switch in selectivity provides an interesting tool for selective fluorination in substrates with multiple benzylic sites.

Figure 28: Decatungstate-photocatalyzed versus AIBN-initiated selective benzylic fluorination.

In 2017, Wu and co-workers disclosed the use of catalytic amounts of the organic dye Acr+-Mes under visible-light irradiation in combination with stoichiometric amounts of Selectfluor to achieve benzylic fluorination (Figure 29) . It was proposed that a SET between Selectfluor and the photoexcited catalyst liberated fluoride and a potent HAT reagent capable of generating the benzylic radical, which then performs FAT with Selectfluor to generate the desired benzyl fluoride. Alternatively, the benzylic radical could further be oxidized to the cation, and in the process, regenerating the ground-state catalyst. The benzylic cation would then be trapped by the previously liberated fluoride. This reactivity was demonstrated on one primary, one tertiary and eight secondary substrates. When diphenylmethane substrates were subjected to the reaction conditions benzylic ketone products were observed.

Figure 29: Benzylic fluorination using organic dye Acr+-Mes and Selectfluor.

As highlighted by the examples in this section, radical-based approaches enable the fluorination of a diverse range of benzylic substrates, which rely on the use of FAT reagents, such as Selectfluor, NFSI or copper fluoride complexes.

Nucleophilic benzylic C(sp3)–H fluorination

Nucleophilic fluorine sources can be more economical from financial and waste perspectives when compared to reagents such as Selectfluor and NFSI . This type of fluorine source is also preferred for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with [18F]fluoride . Despite the challenges associated with nucleophilic fluoride, including solubility issues of metal fluoride salts, safety issues with hydrogen fluoride, poor nucleophilicity , and side reactivity as a base , a few elegant examples of nucleophilic benzylic C(sp3)–H fluorination have been reported.

Metal catalysis

Fluoride sources have been used in combination with transition-metal complexes to generate metal–fluorine bonds capable of FAT to benzylic substrates. In a follow-up to their work using electrophilic fluorine sources for palladium-catalysed benzylic C–H fluorination (Figure 5), the Sanford group demonstrated in 2012 the same transformation could be achieved with nucleophilic fluoride sources too (Figure 30) . This process involved an initial quinoline-directed C–H activation by Pd(II), followed by oxidation to generate a Pd(IV)–fluoride complex capable of C–F reductive elimination to generate the primary benzyl fluoride. Under this protocol, eleven 8-methylquinoline derivatives could be fluorinated in yields of up to 70%.

Figure 30: Palladium-catalysed benzylic C(sp3)–H fluorination with nucleophilic fluoride.

In 2013, Groves and co-workers reported the use of manganese salen and manganese porphyrin catalysts in the preparation of a range of secondary benzyl fluorides via C–H fluorination (Figure 31) . Substrates bearing electron-withdrawing substituents on the