Large-scale aggregate data for left bundle branch area pacing as first line for CRT: climbing the pyramid of evidence

Wiggers C. The muscular reactions of the mammalian ventricles to artificial surface stimuli. Am J Physiol. 1925;73:346–78.

Article  Google Scholar 

Vijayaraman P, Pokharel P, Subzposh FA, Oren JW, Storm RH, Batul SA, et al. His-Purkinje conduction system pacing optimized trial of cardiac resynchronization therapy vs biventricular pacing. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2023;9(12):2628–38.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wang Y, Zhu H, Hou X, Wang Z, Zou F, Qian Z, et al. Randomized trial of left bundle branch vs biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;80(13):1205–16.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pujol-Lopez M, Jiménez-Arjona R, Garre P, Guasch E, Borràs R, Doltra A, et al. Conduction system pacing vs biventricular pacing in heart failure and wide QRS patients. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2022;8(11):1431–45.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Senn S. Statistical issues in drug development. 2nd ed. West Sussex UK: Wiley; 2007. p. 251–267.

van Wely M. The good, the bad and the ugly: meta-analyses. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(8):1622–6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

LeLorier J, Grégoire G, Benhaddad A, Lapierre J, Derderian F. Discrepancies between meta-analyses and subsequent large randomized, controlled trials. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(8):536–42.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Diaz JC, Gabr M, Tedrow UB, Duque M, Aristizabal J, Marin J, et al. Improved all-cause mortality with left bundle branch area pacing compared to biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a meta-analysis. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024 Apr 26. Online ahead of print.

Kim JA, Kim SE, Ellenbogen KA, Vijayaraman P, Chelu MG. Clinical outcomes of conduction system pacing versus biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023;34(8):1718–29.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Humaidan P, Polyzos NP. (Meta)analyze this: systematic reviews might lose credibility. Nat Med. 2012;18(9):1321–1321.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Collins R, Bowman L, Landray M, Peto R. The magic of randomization versus the myth of real-world evidence. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(7):674–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jin C, Dai Q, Li P, Lam P, Cha Y. Left bundle branch area pacing for heart failure patients requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy: a meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023;34(9):1933–43.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yousaf A, Ahmad S, Peltz J, Ahsan MJ, Abbas KS, Muhammad S, et al. Left bundle branch area pacing vs biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart Rhythm 02. 2023;4(11):671–80.

Article  Google Scholar 

Tavolinejad H, Kazemian S, Bozorgi A, Michalski R, Hoyer D, Sedding D, et al. Effectiveness of conduction system pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023;34(11):2342–59.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wang Y, Liu F, Liu M, Wang Z, Lu X, Huang J, et al. His-Purkinje system pacing versus biventricular pacing in clinical efficacy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023;23(1):285.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ferreira Felix I, Collini M, Fonseca R, Guida C, Armaganijan L, Healey JS, et al. Conduction system pacing versus biventricular pacing in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Heart Rhythm. 2024;21(6):881–889

Comments (0)

No login
gif