Abeare, C., Sabelli, A., Taylor, B., Holcomb, M., Dumitrescu, C., Kirsch, N., & Erdodi, L. (2019). The importance of demographically adjusted cutoffs: Age and education bias in raw score cutoffs within the Trail Making Test. Psychological Injury and Law, 12(2), 170–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-019-09353-x

Article  Google Scholar 

Aita, S. L., Borgogna, N. C., Aita, L. J., Ogden, M. L., & Hill, B. D. (2020). Comparison of clinical psychologist and physician beliefs and practices concerning malingering: Results from a mixed methods study. Psychological Injury and Law, 13(3), 246–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-020-09374-x

Article  Google Scholar 

American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed., text rev.). Author. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787

Arango-Lasprilla, J. C., Ayearst, L. E., Rivera, D., Dini, M. E., Olabarrieta-Landa, L., Ramos-Usuga, D., Perrin, P. B., & McCaffrey, R. (2024). Test of memory malingering 2nd edition: Normative data from cognitively intact adults living in Spain. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2024.2421450

Ashendorf, L., Withrow, S., Ward, S. H., Sullivan, S. K., & Sugarman, M. A. (2024). Decision rules for an abbreviated administration fo the Test of Memory Malingering. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 31(4), 382–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2022.2026948

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Basso, M. R., Whiteside, D. M., & Combs, D. (2024). Introduction to the special issue on performance validity: What are we doing? What should we do? Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 46(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2024.2347119

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bender, S. D., & Frederick, R. (2018). Neuropsychological models of feigned cognitive deficits. In R. Rogers, & S. D. Bender (Eds.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (4th ed., pp. 42–60). Guilford Press.

Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2020b). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-3 (MMPI-3): Technical manual. University of Minnesota Press.

Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2020a). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-3 (MMPI-3): Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. University of Minnesota Press.

Google Scholar 

Berry, D. T. R., & Nelson, N. W. (2010). DSM-5 and malingering: A modest proposal. Psychological Injury and Law, 3(4), 295–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-010-9087-7

Article  Google Scholar 

Blevins, C. A., Weathers, F. W., Davis, M. T., Witte, T. K., & Domino, J. L. (2015). The posttraumatic stress disorder checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5): Development and initial psychometric evaluation. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 28(6), 489–498. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.22059

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Crişan, I., & Erdodi, L. (2024). Examining the cross-cultural validity of the test of memory malingering and the Rey 15-item test. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 31(5), 721–731. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2022.2064753

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dandachi-FitzGerald, B., Merckelbach, H., & Merten, T. (2024). Cry for help as a root cause of poor symptom validity: A critical note. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 31(4), 527–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2022.2040025

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Erdodi, L. A. (2023). From “below chance” to “a single error is one too many”: Evaluating various thresholds for invalid performance on two forced choice recognition tests. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 41, 445–462. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2609

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Erdodi, L. A., Abeare, C. A., Lichtenstein, J. D., Tyson, B. T., Kucharski, B., Zuccato, B. G., & Roth, R. M. (2017). Wechsler adult intelligence scale-fourth edition (WAIS-IV) processing speed scores as measures of noncredible responding: The third generation of embedded performance validity indicators. Psychological Assessment, 29(2), 148–157. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000319

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Foote, W. E., Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Young, G. (2020). Civil forensic evaluation in psychological injury and law: Legal, professional, and ethical considerations. Psychological Injury and Law, 13(4), 327–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-020-09398-3

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Gaillard, N. D. (2018). Psychopathology and deception. In R. Rogers & S. D. Bender (Eds.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (pp. 174–187). Guilford Press.

Google Scholar 

Giromini, L., Young, G., & Sellbom, M. (2022). Assessing negative response bias using self-report measures: New articles, new issues. Psychological Injury and Law, 15(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-022-09444-2

Article  Google Scholar 

Glassmire, D. M., Wood, M. E., Ta, M. T., Kinney, D. I., & Nitch, S. R. (2019). Examining false-positive rates of Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-IV) processing speed-based embedded validity indicators among individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Psychological Assessment, 31(1), 120–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000650

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Guilmette, T. J., Sweet, J. J., Hebben, N., Koltai, D., Mahone, E. M., Spiegler, B. J., Stucky, K., Westerveld, M., & Participants, C. (2020). American academy of clinical neuropsychology consensus conference statement on uniform labeling of performance test scores. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 34(3), 437–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2020.1722244

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Iverson, G. L., Lange, R. T., Green, P., & Franzen, M. (2002). Detecting exaggeration and malingering with the Trail Making Test. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 16(3), 398–406. https://doi.org/10.1076/clin.16.3.398.13861

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kurtz, J. E., & Pintarelli, E. M. (2024). The Daubert standards for admissibility of evidence based on the Personality Assessment Inventory. Psychological Injury and Law, 17(2), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-024-09508-5

Article  Google Scholar 

Lange, R. T., Iverson, G. L., & Rose, A. (2010). Post-concussion symptom reporting and the “good-old-days” bias following mild traumatic brain injury. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 25(5), 442–450. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acq031

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Leonhard, C. (2023a). Review of statistical and methodological issues in the forensic prediction of malingering from validity tests: Part I: Statistical issues. Neuropsychology Review, 33(3), 581–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-023-09601-7

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Leonhard, C. (2023b). Review of statistical and methodological issues in the forensic prediction of malingering from validity tests: Part II – Methodological issues. Neuropsychological Review, 33(3), 604–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-023-09602-6

Article  Google Scholar 

Leonhard, C. (2023c). Quo Vadis forensic neuropsychological malingering determinations? Reply to Drs. Bush, Faust, and Jewsbury. Neuropsychological Review, 33(3), 653–657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-023-09606-2

Martens, M., Donders, J., & Millis, S. R. (2001). Evaluation of invalid response sets after traumatic head injury. Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, 2(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1300/J151v02n01_01

Article  Google Scholar 

Martin, P. K., & Schroeder, R. W. (2020). Base rates of invalid test performance across clinical non-forensic contexts and settings. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 35(6), 717–725. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acaa017

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Martin, P. K., Schroeder, R. W., & Odland, A. P. (2015). Neuropsychologists’ validity testing beliefs and practices: A survey of North American professionals. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 29(6), 741–776. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2015.1087597

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Merckelbach, H., Dandachi-FitzGerald, B., van Helvoort, D., Jelicic, M., & Otgaar, H. (2019). When patients overreport symptoms: More than just malingering. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(3), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419837681

Article  Google Scholar 

Neal, T. M. S., Lienert, P., Denne, E., & Singh, J. P. (2022a). A general model of cognitive bias in human judgment and systematic review specific to forensic mental health. Law and Human Behavior, 46(2), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000482

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Neal, T. M. S., Martire, K. A., Johan, J. L., Mathers, E. M., & Otto, R. K. (2022b). The law meets psychological expertise: Eight best practices to improve forensic psychological assessment. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 18(1), 169–192. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-050420-010148

Article  Google Scholar 

Nussbaum, S., Parsons, J., Crişan, I., & Erdodi, L. A. (2025). Complications in neuropsychological assessment. In G. Young, T. D. Bailey, L. Giromini, J. R. Soble, R. Rogers, & B. Levitt (Eds.), Handbook of psychological injury and law. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-69734-0_11

Reitan R. M. (1992). Trail making test manual for administration and scoring. Reitan Neuropsychological Laboratory.

Resnick, P. J., West, S., & Payne, J. W. (2008). Malingering of posttraumatic disorders. In R. Rogers (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (3rd ed., pp. 109–127). Guilford Press.

Resnick, P. J., West, S., & Wooley, C. N. (2018). The malingering of posttraumatic disorders. In R. Rogers & S. D. Bender (Eds.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (4th ed., pp. 188–211). Guilford Press.

Rogers, R. (1990). Models of feigned mental illness. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 21(3), 182–188. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.21.3.182

Article  Google Scholar 

Rogers, R. (2018a). An introduction to response styles. In R. Rogers, & S. D. Bender (Eds.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (4th ed., pp. 3–17). Guilford Press.

Rogers, R. (2018b). Detection strategies for malingering and defensiveness. In R. Rogers, & S. D. Bender (Eds.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (4th ed., pp. 18–41). Guilford Press

Rogers, R., & Bender, S. D. (2018). Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (4th ed.). Guilford Press.

Rogers, R., Bender, S. D., & Johnson, S. F. (2011). A critical analysis of the MND criteria for feigned cognitive impairment: Implications for forensic practice and research. Psychological Injury and Law, 4(2), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-011-9107-2

Rogers, R., Bender, S. D., & Hartigan, S. E. (2024). An overview of malingering and deception in neuropsychiatric cases. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 42(1), 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2636

Article  Google Scholar 

Rogers, R., Pan, M., & Drogin, E. Y. (2023). Response styles within the forensic context: Conceptual issues and assessment methods. In D. DeMatteo & K. Scherr (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of psychology and law (pp. 326–342). Oxford University Press.

Chapter  Google Scholar 

Rubenzer, S. (2020). The case for assessing for negative response bias, not malingering. Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice, 20(4), 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/24732850.2020.1732767

Article  Google Scholar