Bouillaguet S, Shaw L, Barthelemy J, Krejci I, Wataha JC. Long-term sealing ability of Pulp Canal Sealer, AH-Plus. GuttaFlow and Epiphany Int Endod J. 2008;41:219–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01343.x.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Jeong JW, DeGraft-Johnson A, Dorn SO, Di Fiore PM. Dentinal Tubule Penetration of a Calcium Silicate-based Root Canal Sealer with Different Obturation Methods. J Endod. 2017;43:633–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.11.023.

Article  Google Scholar 

Turkel E, Onay EO, Ungor M. Comparison of Three Final Irrigation Activation Techniques: Effects on Canal Cleanness, Smear Layer Removal, and Dentinal Tubule Penetration of Two Root Canal Sealers. Photomed Laser Surg. 2017;35:672–81. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2016.4234.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Banphakarn N, Yanpiset K, Banomyong D. Shear bond strengths of calcium silicate-based sealer to dentin and calcium silicate-impregnated gutta-percha. J Investig Clin Dent. 2019;10:e12444. https://doi.org/10.1111/jicd.12444.

Article  Google Scholar 

Zhou HM, Shen Y, Zheng W, Li L, Zheng YF, Haapasalo M. Physical properties of 5 root canal sealers. J Endod. 2013;39:1281–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.06.012.

Article  Google Scholar 

López-García S, Myong-Hyun B, Lozano A, et al. Cytocompatibility, bioactivity potential, and ion release of three premixed calcium silicate-based sealers. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24:1749–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-03036-2.

Article  Google Scholar 

Harishma S, Jeyalakshmi KB, Shetty KS, Harshini S. Comparative analysis of an epoxy resin-based and a premixed calcium silicate-based sealer’s push-out bond strength with and without incorporation of chitosan nanoparticles: An in vitro investigation. J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024;27:970–4. https://doi.org/10.4103/jcde.Jcde_359_24.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Arslan H, Abbas A, Karatas E. Influence of ultrasonic and sonic activation of epoxy-amine resin-based sealer on penetration of sealer into lateral canals. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20:2161–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1737-z.

Article  Google Scholar 

Guimarães BM, Amoroso-Silva PA, Alcalde MP, Marciano MA, de Andrade FB, Duarte MA. Influence of ultrasonic activation of 4 root canal sealers on the filling quality. J Endod. 2014;40:964–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.11.016.

Article  Google Scholar 

Urban K, Donnermeyer D, Schäfer E, Bürklein S. Canal cleanliness using different irrigation activation systems: a SEM evaluation. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21:2681–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2070-x.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Teves A, Blanco D, Casaretto M, et al. Multispecies biofilm removal by XP-endo Finisher and passive ultrasonic irrigation: A scanning electron microscopy study. Aust Endod J. 2022;48:91–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12549.

Article  Google Scholar 

Clark D, Khademi J. Modern molar endodontic access and directed dentin conservation. Dent Clin North Am. 2010;54:249–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2010.01.001.

Article  Google Scholar 

Peng W, Zhou X, Gao Y, Xu X. Effect of Access Cavity Preparation on Dentin Preservation, Biomechanical Property, and Instrumentation Efficacy: A Micro-Computed Tomographic Study. J Endod. 2022;48:659–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2021.12.012.

Article  Google Scholar 

Alovisi M, Pasqualini D, Musso E, et al. Influence of Contracted Endodontic Access on Root Canal Geometry: An In Vitro Study. J Endod. 2018;44:614–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.11.010.

Article  Google Scholar 

Rover G, Belladonna FG, Bortoluzzi EA, De-Deus G, Silva E, Teixeira CS. Influence of Access Cavity Design on Root Canal Detection, Instrumentation Efficacy, and Fracture Resistance Assessed in Maxillary Molars. J Endod. 2017;43:1657–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.05.006.

Article  Google Scholar 

Barbosa AFA, Silva E, Coelho BP, Ferreira CMA, Lima CO, Sassone LM. The influence of endodontic access cavity design on the efficacy of canal instrumentation, microbial reduction, root canal filling and fracture resistance in mandibular molars. Int Endod J. 2020;53:1666–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13383.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Lima CO, Barbosa AFA, Ferreira CM, et al. Influence of ultraconservative access cavities on instrumentation efficacy with XP-endo Shaper and Reciproc, filling ability and load capacity of mandibular molars subjected to thermomechanical cycling. Int Endod J. 2021;54:1383–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13525.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Carneiro VF, Alcalde MP, do Vale MS, Vivan RR, Duarte MAH, Vasconcelos BC. Effect of ultrasonic agitation on marginal adaptation, intratubular penetration and bonding strength of calcium-silicate-based endodontic sealers: A laboratory study. Aust Endod J. 2023;49:690–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12769.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

De-Deus G, Reis C, Beznos D, de Abranches AM, Coutinho-Filho T, Paciornik S. Limited ability of three commonly used thermoplasticized gutta-percha techniques in filling oval-shaped canals. J Endod. 2008;34:1401–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.08.015.

Article  Google Scholar 

Neelakantan P, Khan K, Hei Ng GP, Yip CY, Zhang C, Pan Cheung GS. Does the Orifice-directed Dentin Conservation Access Design Debride Pulp Chamber and Mesial Root Canal Systems of Mandibular Molars Similar to a Traditional Access Design? J Endod. 2018;44:274–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.10.010.

Article  Google Scholar 

Eymirli A, Uzunoğlu Özyürek E, Serper A. Sealer penetration: effect of separated file’s cross-section, taper and motion characteristics. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25:1077–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03404-3.

Article  Google Scholar 

Eid D, Medioni E, De-Deus G, Khalil I, Naaman A, Zogheib C. Impact of Warm Vertical Compaction on the Sealing Ability of Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers: A Confocal Microscopic Evaluation. Materials (Basel). 2021;14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14020372.

Casino Alegre A, Aranda Verdú S, Zarzosa López JI, Plasencia Alcina E, Rubio Climent J, Pallarés SA. Intratubular penetration capacity of HiFlow bioceramic sealer used with warm obturation techniques and single cone: A confocal laser scanning microscopic study. Heliyon. 2022;8:e10388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10388.

Article  Google Scholar 

Celikten B, C FU, A IO, et al. Micro-CT assessment of the sealing ability of three root canal filling techniques. J Oral Sci. 2015;57:361–6. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.57.361.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Alshehri M, Alamri HM, Alshwaimi E, Kujan O. Micro-computed tomographic assessment of quality of obturation in the apical third with continuous wave vertical compaction and single match taper sized cone obturation techniques. Scanning. 2016;38:352–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/sca.21277.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ortiz FG, Jimeno EB. Analysis of the porosity of endodontic sealers through micro-computed tomography: A systematic review. J Conserv Dent. 2018;21:238–42. https://doi.org/10.4103/jcd.Jcd_346_17.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Schilder H. Filling root canals in three dimensions 1967. J Endod. 2006;32:281–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.02.007.

Article  Google Scholar 

Haji TH, Selivany BJ, Suliman AA. Sealing ability in vitro study and biocompatibility in vivo animal study of different bioceramic based sealers. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2022;8:1582–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.652.

Article  Google Scholar 

Lim ES, Park YB, Kwon YS, Shon WJ, Lee KW, Min KS. Physical properties and biocompatibility of an injectable calcium-silicate-based root canal sealer: in vitro and in vivo study. BMC Oral Health. 2015;15:129. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-015-0112-9.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Silva Almeida LH, Moraes RR, Morgental RD, Pappen FG. Are Premixed Calcium Silicate-based Endodontic Sealers Comparable to Conventional Materials? A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies. J Endod. 2017;43:527–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.11.019.

Article  Google Scholar 

Loushine BA, Bryan TE, Looney SW, et al. Setting properties and cytotoxicity evaluation of a premixed bioceramic root canal sealer. J Endod. 2011;37:673–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.01.003.

Article  Google Scholar 

De Bem IA, de Oliveira RA, Weissheimer T, Bier CAS, Só MVR, Rosa RAD. Effect of Ultrasonic Activation of Endodontic Sealers on Intratubular Penetration and Bond Strength to Root Dentin. J Endod. 2020;46:1302–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2020.06.014.

Article  Google Scholar 

Rover G, de Lima CO, Belladonna FG, et al. Influence of minimally invasive endodontic access cavities on root canal shaping and filling ability, pulp chamber cleaning and fracture resistance of extracted human mandibular incisors. Int Endod J. 2020;53:1530–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13378.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Silva AA, Belladonna FG, Rover G, et al. Does ultraconservative access affect the efficacy of root canal treatment and the fracture resistance of two-rooted maxillary premolars? Int Endod J. 2020;53:265–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13219.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Keles A, Askerbeyli Ors S, Purali N, Kucukkaya Eren S. Effect of different sealer activation techniques on dentinal tubule penetration. Aust Endod J. 2023;49:470–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12738.

Article  Google Scholar 

Wiesse PEB, Silva-Sousa YT, Pereira RD, et al. Effect of ultrasonic and sonic activation of root canal sealers on the push-out bond strength and interfacial adaptation to root canal dentine. Int Endod J. 2018;51:102–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12794.