Behavioural theories, models and frameworks to underpin clinical pharmacy and pharmacy practice research: guidance from the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy

Garcia-Cardenas V, Rossing CV, Fernandez-Llimos F, et al. Pharmacy practice research—a call to action. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2020;16(11):1602–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.07.031.

Article  Google Scholar 

Loh ZW, Cheen MH, Wee HL. Humanistic and economic outcomes of pharmacist-provided medication review in the community-dwelling elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2016;41(6):621–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpt.12453.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nørgaard LS, Traulsen JM, Bissell P. Arguments for theory-based pharmacy practice research. Int J Pharm Pract. 2000;8(2):77–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-7174.2000.tb00989.x.

Article  Google Scholar 

Stewart D, Klein S. The use of theory in research. Int J Clin Pharm. 2016;38:615–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-015-0216-y.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mount JK. Contributions of the social sciences. In: Wertheimer AI, Smith MC, editors. Pharmacy practice—social and behavioral aspects. Philadelphia: Williams & Wilkins; 1989. p. 1–15.

Google Scholar 

Fernandez-Llimos F, Desselle S, Stewart D, et al. Improving the quality of publications in and advancing the paradigms of clinical and social pharmacy practice research: the Granada statements. Int J Clin Pharm. 2023;45:285–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-023-01550-8.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Alves da Costa F, Fernandez-Llimos F, Desselle S, et al. The International Collaboration of Pharmacy Journal Editors (ICPJE) formally constituted to foster quality around clinical and social pharmacy practice research publications. Int J Clin Pharm. 2025;47:4–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-024-01833-8.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Grol RP, Bosch MC, Hulscher ME, et al. Planning and studying improvement in patient care: the use of theoretical perspectives. Milbank Q. 2007;85(1):93–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00478.x.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Nørgaard LS, Traulsen JM. Philosophical perspectives and theories applied in pharmacy practice research: Filosofiske perspektiver og teorier appliceret på apotekspraksisforskning. In: Babar Z, editor. Encyclopedia of pharmacy practice and clinical pharmacy, vol. 1–3. Hoboken: Elsevier; 2019. p. 150–61.

Google Scholar 

Luetsch K, Luetsch K, Maidment I, et al. Realist research to inform pharmacy practice and policy. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2021;17(12):2075–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SAPHARM.2021.06.026.

Article  Google Scholar 

Stewart D, Al Hail M, Al-Shaibi S, et al. A scoping review of theories used to investigate clinician adherence to clinical practice guidelines. Int J Clin Pharm. 2023;45(1):52–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-022-01490-9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Buchanan DR. Beyond positivism: humanistic perspectives on theory and research in health education. Health Educ Res. 1998;13(3):439–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/13.3.439.

Article  Google Scholar 

Nazar Z, Naseralallah LM, Stewart D, et al. Application of behavioural theories, models, and frameworks in pharmacy practice research based on published evidence: a scoping review. Int J Clin Pharm. 2024;46:559–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-023-01674-x.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Scott J, Marshall G. A dictionary of sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.

Google Scholar 

Wacker JG. A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. J Oper Manag. 1998;16(4):361–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00019-9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Karnon J, Mackay M, Mills T, editors. Mathematical modelling in health care. In: 18th World IMACS/MODSIM Congress; 2009: Citeseer.

Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci. 2015;10:53.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Creswell JW. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. New York: Sage Publications; 2017.

Google Scholar 

Hughes S, Davis TE, Imenda SN. Demystifying theoretical and conceptual frameworks: a guide for students and advisors of educational research. J Soc Sci. 2019;58(1–3):24–35.

Google Scholar 

Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA, et al. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2021;30(374):2061. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n2061.

Article  Google Scholar 

Michie S, Van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011;6(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-42.

Article  Google Scholar 

Madden TJ, Scholder Ellen P, Ajzen I. A comparison of the theory of planned behaviour and the theory of reasoned action. Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 1992;18(1):3–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292181001.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ajzen I. From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In: Kuhl J, Beckmann J, editors. Action control. SSSP Springer series in social psychology. Berlin: Springer; 1985. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2.

Chapter  Google Scholar 

Luder H, Frede S, Kirby J, et al. Health beliefs describing patients enrolling in community pharmacy disease management programs. J Pharm Pract. 2016;29(4):374–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0897190014566311.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tecen-Yucel K, Ozdemir N, Kara E, et al. Factors associated with intention of clinical pharmacists and candidates to provide pharmaceutical care: application of theory planned behaviour. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):682. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04658-7.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Alhamad H, Donyai P. The validity of the theory of planned behaviour for understanding people’s beliefs and intentions toward reusing medicines. Pharmacy (Basel). 2021;9(1):58. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy9010058.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Social Change UK. A guide on the COM-B Model of Behaviour. 2019. https://social-change.co.uk/files/02.09.19_COM-B_and_changing_behaviour_.pdf. Accessed 14 Mar 2025

Jatau AI, Peterson GM, Bereznicki L, et al. Applying the capability, opportunity, and motivation behaviour model (COM-B) to guide the development of interventions to improve early detection of atrial fibrillation. Clin Med Insights Cardiol. 2019;13:1179546819885134. https://doi.org/10.1177/1179546819885134.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Keller MS, Carrascoza-Bolanos J, Breda K, et al. Identifying barriers and facilitators to deprescribing benzodiazepines and sedative hypnotics in the hospital setting using the theoretical domains framework and the capability, opportunity, motivation and behaviour (COM-B) Model: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2023;13(2):66234. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066234.

Article  Google Scholar 

Maxwell-Smith C, Breare H, Dominguez GA, et al. Pharmacists’ perceptions and delivery of health behaviour change recommendations: mapping the COM-B model. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2024;20(2):115–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.10.008.

Article  Google Scholar 

Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, et al. Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14(1):26–33. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2004.011155.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Cane J, Oonnor D, Michie S. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci. 2012;7:37. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-37.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Atkins L, Francis J, Islam R, et al. A guide to using the theoretical domains framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems. Implement Sci. 2007;12:77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0605-9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Isenor JE, Minard LV, Stewart SA, et al. Identification of the relationship between barriers and facilitators of pharmacist prescribing and self-reported prescribing activity using the theoretical domains framework. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2018;14(8):784–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2017.10.004.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hussein R, Whaley CRJ, Lin ECJ, Grindrod K. Identifying barriers, facilitators and behaviour change techniques to the adoption of the full scope of pharmacy practice among pharmacy professionals: using the theoretical domains framework. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2021;17(8):1396–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.10.003.

Article  Google Scholar 

Courtenay M, Rowbotham S, Lim R, et al. Examining influences on antibiotic prescribing by nurse and pharmacist prescribers: a qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework and COM-B. BMJ Open. 2019;9(6): e029177. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029177.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot. 1997;12(1):38–48. https://doi.org/10.4278

Comments (0)

No login
gif