Pain Control Methods for Intrauterine Device Insertion: A Systematic Review of Pharmacologic and Non-Pharmacologic Options

Teal S, Edelman A. Contraception Selection, Effectiveness, and Adverse Effects: A Review. JAMA. 2021;326:2507–18. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.21392.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

D’Arcy S, Cao C, Ahn S, Allan V, Ahmadvand A. Trends of intrauterine device insertion and ‘Googling’ about intrauterine devices before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia. Digit Health. 2022;8:20552076221145800. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076221145799.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Abma J, Martinez G. Teenagers in the United States: Sexual Activity, Contraceptive Use, and Childbearing, 2015–2019. Hyattsville, MD: 2023. https://doi.org/10.15620/cdc:134957.

King LA, Michels KA, Graubard BI, Trabert B. Trends in oral contraceptive and intrauterine device use among reproductive-aged women in the US from 1999 to 2017. Cancer Causes & Control 2021;32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-021-01410-8.

Datta PK, Chowdhury SR, Aravindan A, Nath S, Sen P. Looking for a Silver Lining to the Dark Cloud: A Google Trends Analysis of Contraceptive Interest in the United States Post Roe vs. Wade Verdict Cureus. 2022;14:e27012. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.27012.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Potter J, Rubin SE, Sherman P. Fear of intrauterine contraception among adolescents in New York City. Contraception. 2014;89:446–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2014.01.011.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bracken J, Graham CA. Young women’s attitudes towards, and experiences of, long-acting reversible contraceptives. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2014;19:276–84. https://doi.org/10.3109/13625187.2014.917623.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bever L. IUD placement can be painful. These women used their phones to record it. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/wellness/2024/03/25/tiktok-iud-birth-control-pain/. Published March 25, 2024.

Curtis KM, Nguyen AT, Tepper NK, Zapata LB, Snyder EM, Hatfield-Timajchy K, et al. U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2024. MMWR Recommendations and Reports 2024;73:1–77. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.rr7303a1.

Fillingim RB. Individual differences in pain: understanding the mosaic that makes pain personal. Pain. 2017;158:S11–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000775.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lopes-Garcia EA, Carmona EV, Monteiro I, Bahamondes L. Assessment of pain and ease of intrauterine device placement according to type of device, parity, and mode of delivery. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2023;28:163–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2023.2189500.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Castro TVB, Franceschini SA, Poli-Neto O, Ferriani RA, Silva de Sa MF, Vieira CS. Effect of intracervical anesthesia on pain associated with the insertion of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in women without previous vaginal delivery: a RCT. Human Reproduction 2014;29:2439–45. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu233.

Akers AY, Steinway C, Sonalkar S, Perriera LK, Schreiber C, Harding J, et al. Reducing Pain During Intrauterine Device Insertion. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130:795–802. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002242.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kinsey AC, Pomeroy WB, Martin CE, Gebhard PH, Brown JM, Christenson CV, et al. Anatomy of sexual response and orgasm. Sexual behavior in the human female, Indiana University Press; 1981, p. 567–93.

Giovannetti O, Tomalty D, Velikonja L, Jurkus C, Adams MA. The human cervix: Comprehensive review of innervation and clinical significance. Clin Anat. 2023;36:118–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23960.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Prendiville W, Sankaranarayanan R. Anatomy of the uterine cervix and the transformation zone. Colposcopy and treatment of cervical precancer. No. 45., Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2017.

Lopez LM, Bernholc A, Zeng Y, Allen RH, Bartz D, O’Brien PA, et al. Interventions for pain with intrauterine device insertion. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015;2015. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007373.pub3.

Samy A, Abbas AM, Mahmoud M, Taher A, Awad MH, El husseiny T, et al. Evaluating different pain lowering medications during intrauterine device insertion: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2019;111:553-561.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.11.012.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

EndNote [Computer software]. Version 20. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Clarivate; 2013.

Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5:210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Abbas AM, Ragab E, Abd Ellah NH, Sabra A, Ali SS, Mohamed A, et al. Effect of topical glyceryl trinitrate cream on pain perception during intrauterine device insertion in multiparous women: A randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled study. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2019;48:715–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2019.03.007.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hong QN, Pluye P, Fàbregues S, Bartlett G, Boardman F, Cargo M, et al. Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), version 2018. Registration of Copyright (#1148552), Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Industry Canada

Abbas AM, Ali SS, Salem MN, Sabry M. Effect of oral ketoprofen on pain perception during copper IUD insertion among parous women: a randomized double-blind controlled trial. Middle East Fertil Soc J. 2018;23:491–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mefs.2018.01.009.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ashour AS, Nabil H, Yosif MF, Hussein M, Mageed Allah AA, Mahmoud M, et al. Effect of self-administered vaginal dinoprostone on pain perception during copper intrauterine device insertion in parous women: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2020;114:861–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.05.004.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dogan S, Simsek B. Paracervical block and paracetamol for pain reduction during IUD insertion: a randomized controlled study. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2017;11:Q09-Q11. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/25702.10854.

Article  Google Scholar 

Fouda UM, Salah Eldin NM, Elsetohy KA, Tolba HA, Shaban MM, Sobh SM. Diclofenac plus lidocaine gel for pain relief during intrauterine device insertion. A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Contraception. 2016;93:513–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2016.02.001.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hajiesmaello M, Mohammadi E, Farrokh-Eslamlou H. Evaluation of the effect of 10% lidocaine spray on reducing the pain of intrauterine device insertion: a randomised controlled trial. S Afr J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;25:25–9. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJOG.2019.v25i1.1383.

Article  Google Scholar 

Karabayirli S, Ayrim AA, Muslu B. Comparison of the analgesic effects of oral tramadol and naproxen sodium on pain relief during IUD insertion. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012;19:581–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2012.04.004.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Karasu Y, Cömert DK, Karadaʇ B, Ergün Y. Lidocaine for pain control during IUD insertion. J Turkish German Gynecol Assoc. 2016;17:S8–9.

Google Scholar 

Abbas AM, Abdellah MS, Khalaf M, Bahloul M, Abdellah NH, Ali MK, et al. Effect of cervical lidocaine–prilocaine cream on pain perception during copper T380A intrauterine device insertion among parous women: A randomized double-blind controlled trial. Contraception. 2017;95:251–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2016.10.011.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Aksoy H, Aksoy Ü, Ozyurt S, Açmaz G, Babayigit M. Lidocaine 10% spray to the cervix reduces pain during intrauterine device insertion: a double-blind randomised controlled trial. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2016;42:83–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Abdellah MS, Abbas AM, Hegazy AM, El-Nashar IM. Vaginal misoprostol prior to intrauterine device insertion in women delivered only by elective cesarean section: a randomized double-blind clinical trial. Contraception. 2017;95:538–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2017.01.003.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Alanwar A, Naguip S, El-Ghanam A, El-Sabaa H. Two different doses of self-administered vaginal misoprostol for successful copper intrauterine device insertion in parous women previously delivered by cesarean section- a double blinded randomized clinical trial. GinPolMedProject. 2022;2(63):001–7. https://www.ginekologiaipoloznictwo.com/articles/two-different-doses-of-selfadministered-vaginal-misoprostol-for-successful-copper-intrauterine-device-insertion-in-parou.pdf.

Hashem AT, Mahmoud M, Aly Islam B, Ibrahem Eid M, Ahmed N, Mohamed Mamdouh A, et al. Comparative efficacy of lidocaine–prilocaine cream and vaginal misoprostol in reducing pain during levonorgestrel intrauterine device insertion in women delivered only by cesarean delivery: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2024;165:634–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.14157.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Samy A, Abdelhakim AM, Latif D, Hamza M, Osman OM, Metwally AA. Benefits of vaginal dinoprostone administration prior to levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system insertion in women delivered only by elective cesarean section: a randomized double-blinded clinical trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020;301:1463–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05543-0.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shady NW, Farouk HA, Sallam HF. A randomized double blinded clinical trial to explore the clinical outcomes of vaginal isonicotinic acid hydrazide (INH) administration six hours prior to T380A intrauterine device insertion in persons delivered only by cesarean delivery. Contraception. 2023;120:109788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2022.01.019.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Abd Ellah NH, Abouelmagd SA, Abbas AM, Shaaban OM, Hassanein KMA. Dual-responsive lidocaine in situ gel reduces pain of intrauterine device insertion. Int J Pharm. 2018;538:279–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.01.033.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mansy AA. Does sublingual misoprostol reduce pain and facilitate IUD insertion in women with no previous vaginal de

Comments (0)

No login
gif