Compassionatomy: Can Compassion Contemplative Practices Foster Student Connection with Body Donors and Enhance Empathy in Anatomy Labs?

Ghazanfar H, Rashid S, Hussain A, Ghazanfar M, Ghazanfar A, Javaid A. Cadaveric Dissection a Thing of the Past? The Insight of Consultants, Fellows, and Residents. Cureus. 2018;10(4):e2418. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.2418.PMID:29888147;PMCID:PMC5991920.

Article  Google Scholar 

Shiozawa T, Glauben M, Banzhaf M, Griewatz J, Hirt B, Zipfel S, et al. An insight into professional identity formation: qualitative analyses of two reflection interventions during the dissection course. Anat Sci Educ. 2020;13(3):320–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1917.

Article  Google Scholar 

Stephens GC, Rees CE, Lazarus MD. How does donor dissection influence medical students’ perceptions of ethics? A cross-sectional and longitudinal qualitative study. Anat Sci Educ. 2019;12(4):332–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1877. (2019 May 11. PMID: 30903742).

Article  Google Scholar 

Williams AD, Greenwald EE, Soricelli RL, DePace DM. Medical students’ reactions to anatomic dissection and the phenomenon of cadaver naming. Anat Sci Educ. 2014;7(3):169–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1391. (2013 Aug 1).

Article  Google Scholar 

Dickinson GE, Lancaster CJ, Winfield IC, Reece EF, Colthorpe CA. Detached concern and death anxiety of first-year medical students: before and after the gross anatomy course. Clin Anat. 1997;10(3):201–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2353(1997)10:3%3c201::AID-CA5%3e3.0.CO;2-W. (PMID: 9135887).

Article  Google Scholar 

Goss AL, Viswanathan VB, DeLisser HM. Not just a specimen: a qualitative study of emotion, morality, and professionalism in one medical school gross anatomy laboratory. Anat Sci Educ. 2019;12(4):349–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1868. (2019 Mar 1. PMID: 30739388).

Article  Google Scholar 

McDaniel KG, Brown T, Radford CC, McDermott CH, van Houten T, Katz ME, et al. Anatomy as a model environment for acquiring professional competencies in medicine: experiences at Harvard Medical School. Anat Sci Educ. 2021;14(2):241–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2000.

Article  Google Scholar 

Sheikh H, Carpenter J, Wee J. Medical student reporting of factors affecting pre-clerkship changes in empathy: a qualitative study. Can Med Educ J. 2013;4(1):e26-34 (PMID: 26451198; PMCID: PMC4563652).

Article  Google Scholar 

Beckman E, Childers CE, Hartsock J. A Missed Opportunity: Humanities in Anatomy Lab. J. Med. Humanit. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-025-09937-6. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 40019727.

Iaconisi J, Hasselblatt F, Mayer B, Schoen M, Böckers TM, Böckers A. Effects of an educational film about body donors on students’ empathy and anxiety levels in gross anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2019;12(4):386–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1880.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kaye A, Miranda M, Jones T. The donor letter project: learning professionalism and fostering empathy in an anatomy curriculum. J Med Humanit. 2019;40(4):607–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-019-09573-x.

Article  Google Scholar 

Crow SM, O’Donoghue D, Vannatta JB, Thompson BM. Meeting the family: promoting humanism in gross anatomy. Teach Learn Med. 2012;24(1):49–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2012.641487. (PMID: 22250936).

Article  Google Scholar 

da Rocha AO, Maués JL, Chies GAF, da Silva AP. Assessing the impact of a ceremony in honor of the body donors in the development of ethical and humanistic attitudes among medical students. Anat Sci Educ. 2020;13(4):467–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1920.

Article  Google Scholar 

Guo K, Luo T, Zhou LH, Xu D, Zhong G, Wang H, et al. Cultivation of humanistic values in medical education through anatomy pedagogy and gratitude ceremony for body donors. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(1):440. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02292-1.

Article  Google Scholar 

Talarico EF Jr. A change in paradigm: giving back identity to donors in the anatomy laboratory. Clin Anat. 2013;26(2):161–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22103. (Epub 2012 May 30 PMID: 22648791).

Article  Google Scholar 

Richardson C, Borland C. Talking about a Christine Borland sculpture: effective empathy in contemporary anatomy art (and an emerging counterpart in medical training?). J Vis Art Pract. 2015;14(2):146–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702029.2015.1041743.

Article  Google Scholar 

Böckers A, Jerg-Bretzke L, Lamp C, Brinkmann A, Traue HC, Böckers TM. The gross anatomy course: an analysis of its importance. Anat Sci Educ. 2010;3(1):3–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.124.

Article  Google Scholar 

Jordan RK, Shah SS, Desai H, Tripi J, Mitchell A, Worth RG. Variation of stress levels, burnout, and resilience throughout the academic year in first-year medical students. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(10):e0240667. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240667.

Article  Google Scholar 

Neumann M, Edelhäuser F, Tauschel D, Fischer MR, Wirtz M, Woopen C, et al. Empathy decline and its reasons: a systematic review of studies with medical students and residents. Acad Med. 2011;86(8):996–1009. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e318221e615.

Article  Google Scholar 

Eklund JH, Meranius MS. Toward a consensus on the nature of empathy: a review of reviews. Patient Educ Couns. 2021;104(2):300–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2020.08.022.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hojat M, Vergare MJ, Maxwell K, Brainard G, Herrine SK, Isenberg GA, et al. The devil is in the third year: a longitudinal study of erosion of empathy in medical school. Acad Med. 2009;84(9):1182–91. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181b17e55.

Article  Google Scholar 

Huang R, Shi J, Liu Y, Xian S, Zhang W, Yao Y, et al. Learning environment as a predictor for medical students’ empathy: a multicenter cross-sectional study from 12 medical schools in China. BMC Psychol. 2025;13(1):5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-02174-x.

Article  Google Scholar 

McConville J, McAleer R, Hahne A. Mindfulness training for health profession students-the effect of mindfulness training on psychological well-being, learning and clinical performance of health professional students: a systematic review of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials. Explore (NY). 2017;13(1):26–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2016.10.002.

Article  Google Scholar 

Weingartner LA, Sawning S, Shaw MA, Klein JB. Compassion cultivation training promotes medical student wellness and enhanced clinical care. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1):139. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1546-6.

Article  Google Scholar 

Malpass A, Binnie K, Robson L. Medical Students’ Experience of Mindfulness Training in the UK: Well-Being, Coping Reserve, and Professional Development. Educ Res Int. 2019;2019:4021729. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4021729.

Article  Google Scholar 

Klimecki OM, Leiberg S, Ricard M, Singer T. Differential pattern of functional brain plasticity after compassion and empathy training. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014;9(6):873–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nst060.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hojat M, Mangione S, Nasca TJ, Cohen MJM, Gonnella JS, Erdmann JB, et al. The Jefferson scale of empathy: development and preliminary psychometric data. Educ Psychol Meas. 2001;61:349–65.

Article  Google Scholar 

Aron A, Aron EN, Smollan D. Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1992;63(4):596–612.

Article  Google Scholar 

Betella A, Verschure PF. The affective slider: a digital self-assessment scale for the measurement of human emotions. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(2):e0148037. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148037.

Article  Google Scholar 

Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford university press; 2024.

Abrams MP, Eckert T, Topping D, Daly KD. Reflective writing on the cadaveric dissection experience: an effective tool to assess the impact of dissection on learning of anatomy, humanism, empathy, well-being, and professional identity formation in medical students. Anat Sci Educ. 2021;14(5):658–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2025. (2020 Nov 13. PMID: 33052018).

Article  Google Scholar 

Greene SJ, Rosen L. Sharing personal information about anatomical body donors: what first-year medical students want to know and how it affects emotional responses to dissection. Clin Anat. 2019;32(8):1019–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23389.

Article  Google Scholar 

Mueller CM, Allison SM. In their own words: impact of donor information and personal statements on humanization of donors in a gross anatomy course. Adv Physiol Educ. 2022;46(3):426–37. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00068.2022. (2022 Jun 13. PMID: 35695290).

Article  Google Scholar 

Bellier A, Secheresse T, Stoeckle A, Dols AM, Chaffanjon PC. Impact of background music on medical student anxiety and performance during anatomical dissections: a cluster randomized interventional trial. Anat Sci Educ. 2020;13(4):427–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1918.

Article  Google Scholar 

Andersen FA, Johansen AB, Søndergaard J, Andersen CM, Assing HE. Revisiting the trajectory of medical students’ empathy, and impact of gender, specialty preferences and nationality: a systematic review. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(1):52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-1964-5.PMID:32066430;PMCID:PMC7027232.

Article  Google Scholar 

Quinn MA, Grant LM, Sampene E, Zelenski AB. A Curriculum to Increase Empathy and Reduce Burnout. WMJ. 2020;119(4):258–62 (PMID: 33428836).

Google Scholar 

Elzie CA, Shaia J. A pilot study of the impact of virtually embodying a patient with a terminal illness. Med Sci Educ. 2021;31(2):665–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01243-9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Graham J, Benson LM, Swanson J, Potyk D, Daratha K, Roberts K. Medical humanities coursework is associated with greater measured empathy in medical students. Am J Med. 2016;129(12):1334–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.08.005

Article  Google Scholar 

Shapiro J, Youm J, Kheriaty A, Pham T, Chen Y, Clayma R. The human kindness curriculum: an innovative preclinical initiative to highlight kindness and empathy in medicine. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2019;32(2):53–61. https://doi.org/10.4103/efh.EfH_133_18.

Comments (0)

No login
gif