Turney BW. Anatomy in a modern medical curriculum. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007;89(2):104–7. https://doi.org/10.1308/003588407X168244.

Article  Google Scholar 

Singh R, et al. Is the decline of human anatomy hazardous to medical education/profession?—A review. Surg Radiol Anat. 2015;37(10):1257–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-015-1507-7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Gray’s Anatomy, 39th Edition: The anatomical basis of clinical practice. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26(10):2703–4.

Sugand K, Abrahams P, Khurana A. The anatomy of anatomy: a review for its modernization. Anat Sci Educ. 2010;3(2):83–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.139.

Article  Google Scholar 

Winkelmann A, Hendrix S, Kiessling C. What do students actually do during a dissection course? First steps towards understanding a complex learning experience. Acad Med. 2007;82(10):989–95. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31814a51ef.

Article  Google Scholar 

Poupard M et al. Using virtual reality for enhancing neuroanatomy learning by optimizing cognitive load and intrinsic motivation. 2024. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.35867.17441.

Küçük S, Kapakin S, Göktaş Y. Learning anatomy via mobile augmented reality: effects on achievement and cognitive load. Anat Sci Educ. 2016;9(5):411–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1603.

Article  Google Scholar 

Estai M, Bunt S. Best teaching practices in anatomy education: a critical review. Ann Anat - Anat Anzeiger. 2016;208((Supplement C)):151–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2016.02.010.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kurt E, Yurdakul SE, Ataç A. An overview of the technologies used for anatomy education in terms of medical history. Procedia - Soc Behav Sci. 2013;103(Supplement C):109–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.314.

Article  Google Scholar 

Al-Mohrej OA, et al. Learning methods and strategies of anatomy among medical students in two different Institutions in Riyadh. Saudi Arabia Medical Teacher. 2017;39(sup1):S15–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2016.1254737.

Article  Google Scholar 

Almalaha H. Working memory, cognitive structure, and self-organized learning as predictors of perceived cognitive burden considering difficulty levels of the task. J Educ Humanit Stud. 2014;6(3):157–225.

Google Scholar 

Khalil MK, et al. Interactive and dynamic visualizations in teaching and learning of anatomy: a cognitive load perspective. Anat Record Part B: New Anat. 2005;286B(1):8–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.b.20077.

Article  Google Scholar 

Wilson TD. Role of image and cognitive load in anatomical multimedia, in Teaching anatomy: a practical guide. In: Chan LK, Pawlina W, editors. Springer International Publishing: Cham; 2015. p. 237–246.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08930-0_27

Birbara N. Virtual learning resources for anatomy education: the learner, learning and instructional design. UNSW Sydney. 2020. https://doi.org/10.26190/unsworks/22085.

Moro C, et al. The effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality in health sciences and medical anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2017;10(6):549–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1696.

Article  Google Scholar 

Stirling A, Birt J. An enriched multimedia eBook application to facilitate learning of anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2014;7(1):19–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1373.

Article  Google Scholar 

Paas F, Renkl A, Sweller J. Cognitive load theory: instructional implications of the interaction between information structures and cognitive architecture. Instr Sci. 2004;32(1/2):1–8.

Article  Google Scholar 

Moro C, et al. HoloLens and mobile augmented reality in medical and health science education: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Edu Technol. 2021;52(2):680–94.

Article  Google Scholar 

Poupard M, et al. A systematic review of immersive technologies for education: effects of cognitive load and curiosity state on learning performance. Br J Edu Technol. 2025;56(1):5–41.

Article  Google Scholar 

Mondal H, Mondal S. Adopting augmented reality and virtual reality in medical education in resource-limited settings: constraints and the way forward. Adv Physiol Educ. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00027.2025.

Chen S, et al. Can virtual reality improve traditional anatomy education programmes? A mixed-methods study on the use of a 3D skull model. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20:1–10.

Article  Google Scholar 

Zhao J, et al. The effectiveness of virtual reality-based technology on anatomy teaching: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20:1–10.

Article  Google Scholar 

Sweller J. Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cogn Sci. 1988;12(2):257–85.

Article  Google Scholar 

Siregar T. Differentiated instruction from the perspective of cognitive load theory; 2024.

Bahari A. Challenges and affordances of cognitive load management in technology-assisted language learning: a systematic review. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 2023;39(1):85–100.

Article  Google Scholar 

Juliano JM, Schweighofer N, Liew S-L. Increased cognitive load in immersive virtual reality during visuomotor adaptation is associated with decreased long-term retention and context transfer. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022;19(1):106.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hitch GJ, Allen RJ, Baddeley AD. Attention and binding in visual working memory: two forms of attention and two kinds of buffer storage. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020;82:280–93.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hadie SNH et al. Managing the cognitive load of medical students during anatomy lecture. World Acad Sci, Eng Technol, Int J Bioeng Life Sci. 2015;2(5).

Elliott SN et al. Cognitive load theory: instruction-based research with applications for designing tests. In: Proceedings of the National Association of School Psychologists’ Annual Convention, Boston, MA. 2009.

Qi Qiao Y et al. Using cognitive theory to facilitate medical education. 2014;14:79. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-79.

Leppink J, van den Heuvel A. The evolution of cognitive load theory and its application to medical education. Perspectives on Medical Education. 2015;4(3):119–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-015-0192-x.

Article  Google Scholar 

Young JQ, et al. Cognitive load theory: implications for medical education: AMEE Guide No. 86. Med Teach. 2014;36(5):371–84. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.889290.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hackett M. Medical holography for basic anatomy training. Army Research Lab Orlando Fl. 2013.

Naismith LM, et al. Limitations of subjective cognitive load measures in simulation-based procedural training. Med Educ. 2015;49(8):805–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12732.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hart SG. Nasa-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. Proc Human Factors Ergon Soc Ann Meet. 2006;50(9):904–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120605000909.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hart SG, Staveland LE. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Hancock PA, Meshkati N, editors. Advances in psychology. North-Holland; 1988. p. 139–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9.

Fuchs P. Virtual reality headsets-a theoretical and pragmatic approach. CRC Press. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315208244

Cho MJ, Hwang Y-I. Students’ perception of anatomy education at a Korean medical college with respect to time and contents. Anatomy & cell biology. 2013;46(2):157–62.

Article  Google Scholar 

Chapman SJ, et al. Anatomy in medical education: perceptions of undergraduate medical students. Ann Anat - Anat Anzeiger. 2013;195(5):409–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2013.03.005.

Article  Google Scholar 

Majeník J, Szerdiová L. Preparation of medical students for cadaveric anatomy using multimedia education tools. In: 2017 International Conference on Information and Digital Technologies (IDT); 2017.https://doi.org/10.1109/DT.2017.8024305

Johnston ANB, et al. Student learning styles in anatomy and physiology courses: meeting the needs of nursing students. Nurse Educ Pract. 2015;15(6):415–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2015.05.001.

Article  Google Scholar 

Wang J, et al. Problem-based learning in regional anatomy education at Peking University. Anat Sci Educ. 2010;3(3):121–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.151.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hennessy CM, et al. Social media and anatomy education: using Twitter to enhance the student learning experience in anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2016;9(6):505–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1610.

Article  Google Scholar 

Saltarelli AJ, Roseth CJ, Saltarelli WA. Human cadavers Vs multimedia simulation: a study of student learning in anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2014;7(5):331–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1429.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kirschner PA. Cognitive load theory: implications of cognitive load theory on the design of learning. Learn Instr. 2002;12(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00014-7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Brunzini A. Effectiveness analysis of traditional and mixed reality simulations in medical training: a methodological approach for the assessment of stress, cognitive load and performance. 2021.

Ali A et al. The perception of anatomy teaching among UK medical students. 2015;97:397–400. https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsbull.2015.397