Kamnardsiri T, et al. An interactive physical-cognitive game-based training system using Kinect for older adults: development and usability study. JMIR Serious Games. 2021;9(4):e27848.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Zhang M, et al. Recent developments in game-based virtual reality educational laboratories using the microsoft kinect. Int J Emerg Technol Learn (iJET). 2018;13(1):138–59.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ballas A et al. Game-based system for learning labanotation using Microsoft Kinect. In: 2017 IEEE 6th global conference on consumer electronics (GCCE). 2017. IEEE.

Bonnechère B, et al. The use of commercial video games in rehabilitation: a systematic review. Int J Rehabil Res. 2016;39(4):277–90.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Levin MF, Weiss PL, Keshner EA. Emergence of virtual reality as a tool for upper limb rehabilitation: incorporation of motor control and motor learning principles. Phys Ther. 2015;95(3):415–25.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cameirão MS, et al. Coaching or gaming? Implications of strategy choice for home based stroke rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016;13:1–15.

Article  Google Scholar 

Yeung LF, et al. Effects of camera viewing angles on tracking kinematic gait patterns using Azure Kinect, Kinect v2 and Orbbec Astra Pro v2. Gait Posture. 2021;87:19–26.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yeung L, et al. Evaluation of the Microsoft Kinect as a clinical assessment tool of body sway. Gait Posture. 2014;40(4):532–8.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fern'ndez-Baena A, Susin A, Lligadas X. Biomechanical validation of upper-body and lower-body joint movements of kinect motion capture data for rehabilitation treatments. In: 2012 fourth international conference on intelligent networking and collaborative systems. 2012. IEEE.

Clark RA, et al. Validity of the microsoft kinect for assessment of postural control. Gait Posture. 2012;36(3):372–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bonnechere B, et al. Validity and reliability of the Kinect within functional assessment activities: comparison with standard stereophotogrammetry. Gait Posture. 2014;39(1):593–8.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sade S, et al. Development of an elliptical perturbation system that provides unexpected perturbations during elliptical walking (the EPES system). J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023;20(1):125.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Nucita A, et al. Telerehabilitation with computer vision-assisted markerless measures: a pilot study with rett syndrome patients. Electronics. 2023;12(2):435.

Article  Google Scholar 

Siena FL, et al. Utilising the intel realsense camera for measuring health outcomes in clinical research. J Med Syst. 2018;42:1–10.

Article  Google Scholar 

Wren TA, Isakov P, Rethlefsen SA. Comparison of kinematics between theia markerless and conventional marker-based gait analysis in clinical patients. Gait Posture. 2023;104:9–14.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Triandafilou KM, et al. Development of a 3D, networked multi-user virtual reality environment for home therapy after stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018;15:1–13.

Article  Google Scholar 

Wittmann F, et al. Self-directed arm therapy at home after stroke with a sensor-based virtual reality training system. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016;13:1–10.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bai J, Song A. Development of a novel home based multi-scene upper limb rehabilitation training and evaluation system for post-stroke patients. IEEE Access. 2019;7:9667–77.

Article  Google Scholar 

Lee JI, et al. Effects of the home-based exercise program with an augmented reality system on balance in patients with stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Disabil Rehabil. 2023;45(10):1705–12.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shim GY, et al. A randomized controlled trial of postoperative rehabilitation using digital healthcare system after rotator cuff repair. NPJ Dig Med. 2023;6(1):95.

Article  Google Scholar 

Wiskerke E, et al. Determining the optimal virtual reality exergame approach for balance therapy in persons with neurological disorders using a rasch analysis: longitudinal observational study. JMIR Serious Games. 2022;10(1):e30366.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ellis F, et al. Consideration-of-concept of EvolvRehab-Body for upper limb virtual rehabilitation at home for people late after stroke. Physiotherapy. 2022;116:97–107.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Liu X-T, et al. Feasibility of a kinect-based system in assessing physical function of the elderly for home-based care. BMC Geriatr. 2023;23(1):495.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Duncan PW, et al. Similar motor recovery of upper and lower extremities after stroke. Stroke. 1994;25(6):1181–8.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Clark B et al. The effect of time spent in rehabilitation on activity limitation and impairment after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021(10).

Cooke EV, et al. The effects of increased dose of exercise-based therapies to enhance motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med. 2010;8:1–13.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kwakkel G, et al. Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: a meta-analysis. Stroke. 2004;35(11):2529–39.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kwon J-S, et al. Effects of virtual reality on upper extremity function and activities of daily living performance in acute stroke: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. NeuroRehabilitation. 2012;31(4):379–85.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

In TS, et al. Virtual reality reflection therapy improves motor recovery and motor function in the upper extremities of people with chronic stroke. J Phys Ther Sci. 2012;24(4):339–43.

Article  Google Scholar 

Mirelman A, et al. Effects of virtual reality training on gait biomechanics of individuals post-stroke. Gait Posture. 2010;31(4):433–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cikajlo I, et al. Telerehabilitation using virtual reality task can improve balance in patients with stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(1):13–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Junata M, et al. Kinect-based rapid movement training to improve balance recovery for stroke fall prevention: a randomized controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021;18:1–12.

Article  Google Scholar 

Oliveira L, Simpson D, Nadal J. Calculation of area of stabilometric signals using principal component analysis. Physiol Meas. 1996;17(4):305.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schubert P, Kirchner M. Ellipse area calculations and their applicability in posturography. Gait Posture. 2014;39(1):518–22.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pandyan AD, et al. A review of the properties and limitations of the Ashworth and modified Ashworth Scales as measures of spasticity. Clin Rehabil. 1999;13(5):373–83.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Page SJ, Fulk GD, Boyne P. Clinically important differences for the upper-extremity Fugl-Meyer Scale in people with minimal to moderate impairment due to chronic stroke. Phys Ther. 2012;92(6):791–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hiengkaew V, Jitaree K, Chaiyawat P. Minimal detectable changes of the Berg Balance Scale, Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale, Timed “Up & Go” Test, gait speeds, and 2-minute walk test in individuals with chronic stroke with different degrees of ankle plantarflexor tone. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(7):1201–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pandian S, Arya KN, Kumar D. Minimal clinically important difference of the lower-extremity fugl–meyer assessment in chronic-stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2016;23(4):233–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Park C-S. The test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change of the short-form Barthel Index (5 items) and its associations with chronic stroke-specific impairments. J Phys Ther Sci. 2018;30(6):835–9.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Roach KE, Miles TP. Normal hip and knee active range of motion: the relationship to age. Phys Ther. 1991;71(9):656–65.