Brookes J, Mushtaq F, Jamieson E, Fath AJ, Bingham G, Culmer P, Wilkie RM, Mon-Williams M (2020) Exploring disturbance as a force for good in motor learning. PLoS ONE 15(5):0224055
Cantarero G, Spampinato D, Reis J, Ajagbe L, Thompson T, Kulkarni K, Celnik P (2015) Cerebellar direct current stimulation enhances on-line motor skill acquisition through an effect on accuracy. J Neurosci 35(7):3285–3290
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Colombo R, Sanguineti V (2018) Assistive controllers and modalities for robot-aided neurorehabilitation. Rehabilitation robotics, 63–74
De Zeeuw CI, Ten Brinke MM (2015) Motor learning and the cerebellum. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 7(9):021683
Galea JM, Celnik P (2009) Brain polarization enhances the formation and retention of motor memories. J Neurophysiol 102(1):294–301
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Galea JM, Jayaram G, Ajagbe L, Celnik P (2009) Modulation of cerebellar excitability by polarity-specific noninvasive direct current stimulation. J Neurosci 29(28):9115–9122
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Galea JM, Vazquez A, Pasricha N, Orban de Xivry J-J, Celnik P (2011) Dissociating the roles of the cerebellum and motor cortex during adaptive learning: the motor cortex retains what the cerebellum learns. Cereb Cortex 21(8):1761–1770
Hardwick RM, Celnik PA (2014) Cerebellar direct current stimulation enhances motor learning in older adults. Neurobiol Aging 35(10):2217–2221
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Imamizu H, Kuroda T, Miyauchi S, Yoshioka T, Kawato M (2003) Modular organization of internal models of tools in the human cerebellum. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100(9):5461–5466
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kang N, Summers JJ, Cauraugh JH (2016) Transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates motor learning post-stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 87(4):345–355
Kreuz T, Mormann F, Andrzejak RG, Kraskov A, Lehnertz K, Grassberger P (2007) Measuring synchronization in coupled model systems: a comparison of different approaches. Physica D 225(1):29–42
Kuo M-F, Paulus W, Nitsche MA (2014) Therapeutic effects of non-invasive brain stimulation with direct currents (tdcs) in neuropsychiatric diseases. Neuroimage 85:948–960
Landi SM, Baguear F, Della-Maggiore V (2011) One week of motor adaptation induces structural changes in primary motor cortex that predict long-term memory one year later. J Neurosci 31(33):11808–11813
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Marotta N, Demeco A, Moggio L, Ammendolia A (2021) The adjunct of transcranial direct current stimulation to robot-assisted therapy in upper limb post-stroke treatment. J Med Eng Technol 45(6):494–501
Naros G, Geyer M, Koch S, Mayr L, Ellinger T, Grimm F, Gharabaghi A (2016) Enhanced motor learning with bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation: impact of polarity or current flow direction? Clin Neurophysiol 127(4):2119–2126
Nguemeni C, Stiehl A, Hiew S, Zeller D (2021) No impact of cerebellar anodal transcranial direct current stimulation at three different timings on motor learning in a sequential finger-tapping task. Front Hum Neurosci 15:631517
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ockenfeld C, Tong RK, Susanto EA, Ho S-K, Hu X-l (2013) Fine finger motor skill training with exoskeleton robotic hand in chronic stroke: stroke rehabilitation. In: 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), pp. 1–4. IEEE
Oña ED, Garcia-Haro JM, Jardón A, Balaguer C (2019) Robotics in health care: perspectives of robot-aided interventions in clinical practice for rehabilitation of upper limbs. Appl Sci 9(13):2586
Özen Ö, Buetler KA, Marchal-Crespo L (2021) Promoting motor variability during robotic assistance enhances motor learning of dynamic tasks. Front Neurosci 14:600059
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Qi S, Liang Z, Wei Z, Liu Y, Wang X (2022) Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor skills learning in healthy adults through the activation of different brain regions: A systematic review. Front Hum Neurosci 16:1021375
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Straudi S, Fregni F, Martinuzzi C, Pavarelli C, Salvioli S, Basaglia N (2016) tdcs and robotics on upper limb stroke rehabilitation: effect modification by stroke duration and type of stroke. BioMed research international 2016
Takagi A, Ganesh G, Yoshioka T, Kawato M, Burdet E (2017) Physically interacting individuals estimate the partner’s goal to enhance their movements. Nat Hum Behav 1(3):0054
Tanaka S, Sandrini M, Cohen LG (2011) Modulation of motor learning and memory formation by non-invasive cortical stimulation of the primary motor cortex. Neuropsychol Rehabil 21(5):650–675
Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z (2000) Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nat Neurosci 3(11):1212–1217
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wolpert DM, Miall RC, Kawato M (1998) Internal models in the cerebellum. Trends Cogn Sci 2(9):338–347
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Yılmaz T (2022) Development of 3-d printed exohand for mirror therapy. Master’s thesis. Middle East Technical University
Comments (0)