Ultrasound versus fluoroscopy-guided extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in renal calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL, Monga M, Murad MH, Nelson CP et al (2016) Surgical management of stones: American urological association/endourological society guideline, PART I.1153–1160

Manzoor H, Leslie SW, Saikali SW (2024) Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy.Treasure Island (FL)

Abdel-Kader MS, Fathy A, Moubarek M, Abolyosr A (2023) Which is better, fluoroscopic-guided or ultrasonic-guided shock wave lithotripsy for pediatric renal stones? Prospective randomized comparative study.20230207:1175-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04313-2

Smith HE, Bryant DA, KooNg J, Chapman RA, Lewis G (2016) Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy without radiation: Ultrasound localization is as effective as fluoroscopy.454-7. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.192104

Al-Marhoon MS, Shareef O, Al-Habsi IS, Al Balushi AS, Mathew J, Venkiteswaran KP (2013) Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy success rate and complications: initial experience at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital.255-9. https://doi.org/10.5001/omj.2013.72

Arabzadeh Bahri R, Maleki S, Shafiee A, Shobeiri P (2023) Ultrasound versus fluoroscopy as imaging guidance for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.20230302:e0276708. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276708

Pareek G, Hedican SP, Lee FT Jr., Nakada SY (2005) Shock wave lithotripsy success determined by skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography.941-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2005.05.011

Patel T, Kozakowski K, Hruby G, Gupta M (2009) Skin to stone distance is an independent predictor of stone-free status following shockwave lithotripsy.1383-5. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2009.0394

Leung S (2015) R Radiation protection of the child from diagnostic imaging.235– 42

Icrp, Khong PL, Ringertz H, Donoghue V, Frush D, Rehani M et al (2013) ICRP publication 121: radiological protection in paediatric diagnostic and interventional radiology.1–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icrp.2012.10.001

Duarsa GWK, Putra CN, Ivandi K, Wiryadana KA, Tirtayasa PMW, Pribadi F (2022) Comparison of ultrasonography and fluoroscopy as guides for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in nephrolithiasis patients: a systematic review.160-9

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

Sterne JAC, Savovic J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I et al (2019) RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.20190828:l4898. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898

Sterne JA, Hernan MA, Reeves BC, Savovic J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M et al (2016) ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions.20161012:i4919. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919

Collaboration C (2014) Review manager (revman)

DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials.177– 88. 10.1016/0197–2456(86)90046-2

Van Besien J, Uvin P, Hermie I, Tailly T, Merckx L (2017) Ultrasonography is not inferior to Fluoroscopy to Guide extracorporeal shock waves during treatment of Renal and Upper Ureteric Calculi: a randomized prospective study. 20170515:7802672. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7802672

Siritanan N, Sukkhum W (2021) Ultrasonography is not inferior to Fluoroscopy to Guide in extracorporeal shock waves for treatment of. Renal and Upper Ureteal Calculi 30– 6

Goren MR, Goren V, Ozer C (2017) Ultrasound-guided shockwave lithotripsy reduces Radiation exposure and has better outcomes for Pediatric Cystine Stones.20160430:429– 35. https://doi.org/10.1159/000446220

Ozkaya F (2019) Comparison of the results of shock wave lithotripsy with ultrasonic and fluoroscopic focus in pediatric age group; fluoroscopic focusing how much is needed?

Keskin S, Keser F (2023) Comparison of extracorporeal shock Wave lithotripsy Success Rates between Ultrasound Targeting and X-ray targeting. 109:14

Periasamy P, Narashimman J, Maruthamuthu R, Ramakrishnan R, Vankadara K (2024) The comparison of outcomes between USG guided ESWL vs Fluoroscopy guided ESWL–Our institutional Experience.227– 30

Motolová M, Král M (2021) Ultrasonografická versus fluoroskopická fokusácia urolitiázy pri extrakorporálnej litotrypsii rázovou vlnou.112-9

Macchione N, Elia A, Gofrit O, Pode D, Duvdevani M (2013) E61 SWL with continuous targeting by ultrasound; are there benefits?51

Okada A, Taguchi K, Ando R, Umemoto Y, Itoh Y, Yasui T et al (2013) 1823 EFFECT OF AN ULTRASONIC TARGETING METHOD FOR KIDNEY AND PROXIMAL URETER STONES ON THE SUCCESS RATE OF SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY.e749-e

Arunagiri A (2010) Comparative study of efficacy of localization and fragmentation of Renal Stone by USG and Fluoroscopy guided ESWL

Hegazy A, Abdelfattah D, Hassan H (2020) Ultrasound guided extracorporeal shock Wave lithotripsy (SONO ESWL) versus fluoroscopy guided ESWL in patients with radiopaque renal stones; a comparative randomized study

Zimmermann R, Janetschek G (2010) Exclusively Ultrasound guided Extracoporeal Shock Wave lithotripsy (ESWL): a feasible, effective and Guideline Conformable Concept for Stone Treatment.A107-A8

Jaharudin M, Zainuddin SM, Lee CK, Ghani K-AM, Fahmy O (2022) Effectiveness of ultrasound guided extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.31-

Grabsky A, Tsaturyan A, Musheghyan L, Minasyan G, Khachatryan Y, Shadyan G et al (2021) Effectiveness of ultrasound-guided shockwave lithotripsy and predictors of its success rate in pediatric population: a report from a national reference center.20201020:78 e1- e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.10.014

Sun XZ, Zhang ZW (2006) Shock wave lithotripsy for uric acid stones.36– 9. 10.1016/S1015-9584(09)60292-X

Copelovitch L (2012) Urolithiasis in children: medical approach.20120615:881– 96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2012.05.009

Karim M, Hashim S, Bakar K, Bradley D, Ang W, Bahrudin N et al (2017) Estimation of radiation cancer risk in CT-KUB. 130-4

Cao CF, Ma KL, Shan H, Liu TF, Zhao SQ, Wan Y et al (2022) CT scans and Cancer risks: a systematic review and dose-response Meta-analysis.20221130:1238. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10310-2

Talati J, Khan S, Biyabani R, Khan RA, Naz I, Abbas F et al (2000) Reduction of radiation exposure to patients in the follow-up of shockwave lithotripsy.404-7. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410x.2000.00530.x

Chang TH, Lin WR, Tsai WK, Chiang PK, Chen M, Tseng JS et al (2020) Comparison of ultrasound-assisted and pure fluoroscopy-guided extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for renal stones.20201110:183. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-020-00756-6

Duarsa GWK, Pribadi F (2023) Comparison of efficacy, safety, and cost between ultrasonography and fluoroscopy-ultrasonography as a target device in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in kidney stones less than 1.5 centimeters.1745–1755

Hudnall M, Usawachintachit M, Metzler I, Tzou DT, Harrison B, Lobo E et al (2017) Ultrasound Guidance reduces percutaneous nephrolithotomy cost compared to Fluoroscopy.20161223:52– 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2016.12.030

Comments (0)

No login
gif