Adalı EA, Öztaş T, Özçil A, Öztaş GZ, Tuş A. A new multi-criteria decision-making method under neutrosophic environment: ARAS method with single-valued neutrosophic numbers. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak. 2023;22(1):57–87.

Article  Google Scholar 

Alamin A, Biswas A, Gazi KH, Sankar SPM. Modelling with neutrosophic fuzzy sets for financial applications in discrete system. Spectr Eng Manag Sci. 2024;2(1):263–280. https://doi.org/10.31181/sems21202433a

Albawab M, Ghenai C, Bettayeb M, Janajreh I. Sustainability performance index for ranking energy storage technologies using multi-criteria decision-making model and hybrid computational method. J Energy Storage. 2020;32:101820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2020.101820.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ali A, Ullah K, Hussain A. An approach to multi-attribute decision-making based on intuitionistic fuzzy soft information and Aczel-Alsina operational laws. J Decis Anal Intell Comput. 2023;3(1):80–89. https://doi.org/10.31181/jdaic10006062023a

Atanassov KT. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1986;20:87–96.

Article  Google Scholar 

Atchuthen MTJ, Kumar SSM. How the energy sector is affecting economic growth – comparing the United Kingdom with India. Int J Econ Sci. 2023:12(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.52950/ES.2023.12.1.001.

Baydaş M, Kavacık M, Wang Z. Interpreting the determinants of sensitivity in MCDM methods with a new perspective: an application on E-scooter selection with the PROBID method. Spectr Eng Manag Sci. 2024;2(1):17–35. https://doi.org/10.31181/sems2120242b

Broumi S, Sundareswaran R, Shanmugapriya M, Nordo G, Talea M, Bakali A, Smarandache F. Interval-valued Fermatean neutrosophic graphs. Decis Mak Appl Manag Eng. 2022;5(2):176–200. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame0311072022b

Chakraborty S, Saha AK. Selection of forklift unit for transport handling using integrated MCDM under neutrosophic environment. Facta Univ Ser Mech Eng. 2024;22(2):235–256. https://doi.org/10.22190/FUME220620039C.

Chakraborty S, Saha AK. Selection of forklift unit for transport handling using integrated MCDM under neutrosophic environment. Facta Univ Ser Mech Eng. 2022. https://doi.org/10.22190/FUME220620039C.

Chaurasiya R, Jain D. Hybrid MCDM method on pythagorean fuzzy set and its application. Decis Mak Appl Manag Eng. 2023;6(1):379–98.

Google Scholar 

Çolak M, Kaya İ. Multi-criteria evaluation of energy storage technologies based on hesitant fuzzy information: a case study for Turkey. J Energy Storage. 2020;28:101211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2020.101211.

Article  Google Scholar 

Dağıstanlı HA. An integrated fuzzy MCDM and trend analysis approach for financial performance evaluation of energy companies in Borsa Istanbul sustainability index. J Soft Comput Decis Anal. 2023;1(1):39–49. https://doi.org/10.31181/jscda1120233

Deveci M, Mishra AR, Gokasar I, Rani P, Pamucar D, Ozcan E. A decision support system for assessing and prioritizing sustainable urban transportation in Metaverse. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst. 2023;31:475–84

Dinçer H, Yüksel S, Eti S. Identifying the right policies for increasing the efficiency of the renewable energy transition with a novel fuzzy decision-making model. J Soft Comput Decis Anal. 2023;1(1):50–62. https://doi.org/10.31181/jscda1120234.

Fan J, Lei T, Wu M. MEREC-MABAC method based on cumulative prospect theory for picture fuzzy sets: applications to wearable health technology devices. Expert Syst Appl. 2024;255(Part C):124749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124749.

Farid HMA, Riaz M. Single-valued neutrosophic dynamic aggregation information with time sequence preference for IoT technology in supply chain management. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 2023;126:106940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106940.

Garg NH. A novel divergence measure and its based TOPSIS method for multi criteria decision-making under single-valued neutrosophic environment. J Intell Fuzzy Syst. 2019;36:101–15.

Görçün OF, Ulutaş A, Topal A, Ecer F. Telescopic forklift selection through a novel interval-valued Fermatean fuzzy PIPRECIA–WISP approach. Expert Syst Appl. 2024;255(Part B):124674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124674.

Gul R. An extension of VIKOR approach for MCDM using bipolar fuzzy preference δ-covering based bipolar fuzzy rough set model. Spectr Oper Res. 2025;2(1):72–91. https://doi.org/10.31181/sor21202511.

Haq RSU, Saeed M, Mateen N, Siddiqui F, Naqvi M, Yi JB, Ahmed S. Sustainable material selection with crisp and ambiguous data using single-valued neutrosophic-MEREC-MARCOS framework. Appl Soft Comput. 2022;128:109546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109546.

Hezam IM, Mishra AR, Rani P, Saha A, Smarandache F, Pamucar D. An integrated decision support framework using single-valued neutrosophic-MASWIP-COPRAS for sustainability assessment of bioenergy production technologies. Expert Syst Appl. 2023;211:118674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118674.

Holechek JL, Geli HME, Sawalhah MN, Valdez R. A global assessment: can renewable energy replace fossil fuels by 2050? Sustainability. 2022;14(8):4792. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084792.

Kabak M, Dagdeviren M. Prioritization of renewable energy sources for Turkey by using a hybrid MCDM methodology. Energy Convers Manage. 2014;79:25–33.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kanchana M, Kavitha K. Sensitivity analysis and application of single-valued neutrosophic transportation problem. J King Saud Univ - Sci. 2024;36(11):103567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2024.103567.

Kara K, Yalçın GC, Kaygısız EG, Edinsel S. Assessing the academic performance of Turkish universities in 2023: a MEREC-WEDBA hybrid methodology approach. J Opera Intell. 2024;2(1):252–272. https://doi.org/10.31181/jopi21202422.

Kawecka E, Perec A, Radomska-Zalas A. Use of the simple multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) method for optimization of the high-alloy steel cutting processby the abrasive water jet. Spectr Mech Eng Oper Res. 2024;1(1):111–120. https://doi.org/10.31181/smeor11202411.

Keshavarz-Ghorabaee M, Amiri M, Zavadskas EK, Turskis Z, Antucheviciene J. Determination of objective weights using a new method based on the removal effects of criteria (MEREC). Symmetry. 2021;13:01–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13040525.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kumar R, Pamucar D. A comprehensive and systematic review of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods to solve decision-making problems: two decades from 2004 to 2024. Spectr Decis Mak Appl. 2025;2(1):178–197. https://doi.org/10.31181/sdmap21202524.

Li X, Luo Y, Wang H, Lin J, Deng B. Doctor selection based on aspect-based sentiment analysis and neutrosophic TOPSIS method. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 2023;124:106599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106599.

Liu P, Azeem M, Sarfraz M, Swaray S, Almohsen B. A parametric similarity measure for neutrosophic set and its applications in energy production. Heliyon. 2024;10(19):e38272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38272.

Liu Y, Du J. A multi criteria decision support framework for renewable energy storage technology selection. J Clean Prod. 2020:122183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122183.

Lo H-W, Chan H-W, Lin J-W, Lin S-W. Evaluating the interrelationships of industrial 5.0 development factors using an integration approach of Fermatean fuzzy logic. J Oper Intell. 2024;2(1):95–113. https://doi.org/10.31181/jopi21202416.

Mishra AR, Rani P, Saeidi P, Deveci M, Alrasheedi AF. Fermatean fuzzy score function and distance measure-based group decision making framework for household waste recycling plant location selection. Sci Rep. 2024;14:28106. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-78158-z.

Article  Google Scholar 

Nagaraju D, Chiranjeevi C, Rajasekhar Y, Selvaraj SK, Chadha U, Nagalakshmi R, Paramasivam V. Semantic approach for evaluation of energy storage technologies under fuzzy environment. Adv Fuzzy Syst. 2022;(Article ID 1149503):01–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1149503.

Özkan B, Kaya İ, Cebeci U, Başlıgil H. A hybrid multicriteria decision making methodology based on type-2 fuzzy sets for selection among energy storage alternatives. Int J Comput Intell Syst. 2015;8(5):914–27.

Article  Google Scholar 

Petchimuthu S, Banu MF, Mahendiran C, Premala T. Power and energy transformation: multi-criteria decision-making utilizing complex q-rung picture fuzzy generalized power prioritized Yager operators. Spectr Oper Res. 2025;2(1):219–258. https://doi.org/10.31181/sor21202525.

Petrov S, Aleksandrova S, Kirova S. Environmental effects of green bonds and other forms of financing in the European Union. Int J Econ Sci. 2024;13(1):81–105. https://doi.org/10.52950/ES.2024.13.1.005.

Qie X, Zhang R, Hu Y, Sun X, Chen X. A multi-criteria decision-making approach for energy storage technology selection based on demand. Energies. 2021;14:01–29. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14206592.

Article  Google Scholar 

Rani P, Mishra AR. Novel single-valued neutrosophic combined compromise solution approach for sustainable waste electrical and electronics equipment recycling partner selection. IEEE Trans Eng Manage. 2022;69(6):3139–53.

Article  Google Scholar 

Rani P, Mishra AR, Alshamrani AM, Alrasheedi AF, Tirkolaee EB. Picture fuzzy compromise ranking of alternatives using distance-to-ideal-solution approach for selecting blockchain technology platforms in logistics firms. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 2025;142:109896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109896.

Article  Google Scholar 

Rani P, Mishra AR, Deveci M, Gokasar I, Yemlihalioglu E, Brito-Parada PR. Evaluation of micromobility risk management alternatives using interval-valued q-rung orthopair fuzzy interaction operators-based WISP method. Appl Soft Comput. 2024a;156:111496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2024.111496.

Rani P, Pamucar D, Mishra AR, Hezam IM, Ali J, Ahammad SKH. An integrated interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy WISP approach for industry 4.0 technology assessment and digital transformation. Ann Oper Res. 2024b;342:1235–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-023-05355-w.

Article  Google Scholar 

Sahoo SK, Goswami SS. A comprehensive review of multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods: advancements, applications, and future directions. Decis Mak Adv. 2023;1(1):25–48. https://doi.org/10.31181/dma1120237.

Sahoo SK, Pamucar D, Goswami SS. A review of multi-criteria decision-making applications to solve energy management problems from 2010–2025: current state and future research. Spectr Decis Mak Appl. 2025;2(1):219–241. https://doi.org/10.31181/sdmap21202525.

Seikh MR, Chatterjee P. Sustainable strategies for electric vehicle adoption: a confidence level-based interval-valued spherical fuzzy MEREC-VIKOR approach. Inf Sci. 2025;699:121814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2024.121814.

Sengul U, Eren M, Shiraz SE, Gezder V, Sengul AB. Fuzzy TOPSIS method for ranking renewable energy supply systems in Turkey. Renew Energy. 2015;75:617–25.

Article  Google Scholar 

Shu X, Kumar R, Saha RK, Dev N, Stevic Z, Sharma S, Rafighi M. Sustainability assessment of energy storage technologies based on commercialization viability: MCDM model. Sustainability 2023;15:01–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064707.

Smarandache F. A unifying field in logics. Neutrosophy: neutrosophic probability, set and logic. Rehoboth: American Research Press; 1999.

Google Scholar 

Smarandache F. The score, accuracy, and certainty functions determine a total order on the set of neutrosophic triplets (T, I, F). Neutrosophic Sets Syst. 2020;38:1–14.

Google Scholar 

Stanujkic D, Karabasevic D, Popovic G, Smarandache F, Stanimirović PS, Saračević M, Katsikis VN. A single valued neutrosophic extension of the simple WISP method. J Intell Fuzzy Syst. 2022;33(3):635–51.

Google Scholar 

Stanujkic D, Popovic G, Karabasevic D, Meidute-Kavaliauskiene I, Ulutaş A. An integrated simple weighted sum product method—WISP. IEEE Trans Eng Manage. 2023;70(5):1933–44.

Article  Google Scholar 

Tapia JFD, Ortenero JR, Tan RR. Selection of energy storage technologies under neutrosophic decision environment. Clean Eng Technol. 2022;11:100576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2022.100576.

Thao NX, Smarandache F. Divergence measure of neutrosophic sets and applications. Neutrosophic Sets Syst. 2018;21:142–52.

Google Scholar 

Ulutaş A, Stanujkic D, Karabasevic D, Popovic G, Novaković S. Pallet truck selection with MEREC and WISP-S methods. Strategic Management. 2022. https://doi.org/10.5937/StraMan2200013U%20.

Wang F. Novel score function and standard coefficient-based single-valued neutrosophic MCDM for live streaming sales. Inf Sci. 2024;654:119836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2023.119836.

Wang H, Smarandache F, Zhang YQ, Sunderraman R. Single valued neutrosophic sets. Multispace and Multistructure. 2010;4:410–3.

Google Scholar 

Więckowski J, Sałabun W. Comparative sensitivity analysis in composite material selection: evaluating OAT and COMSAM methods in multi-criteria decision-making. Spectr Mech Eng Oper Res. 2025;2(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.31181/smeor21202524.

Więckowski J, Kizielewicz B, Sałabun W. Fuzzy RANCOM: a novel approach for modeling uncertainty in decision-making processes. Inf Sci. 2025;694:121716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2024.121716.

Article  Google Scholar 

Więckowski J, Kizielewicz B, Shekhovtsov A, Sałabun W. RANCOM: a novel approach to identifying criteria relevance based on inaccuracy expert judgments. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 2023;122:106114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106114.

Więckowski J, Wątróbski J, Shkurina A, Sałabun W. Adaptive multi-criteria decision making for electric vehicles: a hybrid approach based on RANCOM and ESP-SPOTIS. Artif Intell Rev. 2024;57:270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-10901-4.

Article  Google Scholar 

Yang B, Han K, Tu W, Ge Q. Fairness in online vehicle-cargo matching: an intuitionistic fuzzy set theory and tripartite evolutionary game approach. Appl Soft Comput. 2024;167:112418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2024.112418.

Ye J. Single valued neutrosophic cross-entropy for multi-criteria decision-making problems. Appl Math Model. 2014;38:1170–5.

Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Yuan JH, Luo DK, Xia LY, Feng LY. Policy recommendations to promote shale gas development in China based on a technical and economic evaluation. Energy Policy. 2015;85:194–206.

Article  Google Scholar 

Zadeh LA. Fuzzy sets. Inf Control. 1965;8(3):338–53.

Article  Google Scholar 

Zavadskas EK, Baušys R, Stanujkic D, Magdalinovic-Kalinovic M. Selection of lead-zinc flotation circuit design by applying WASPAS method with single-valued neutrosophic set. Acta Montanist Slovaca. 2016;21(2):85–92.

Google Scholar 

Zavadskas EK, Stanujkic D, Karabasevic D, Turskis Z. Analysis of the simple WISP method results using different normalization procedures. Stud Inf Control. 2022a;31(1):5–12.

Article  Google Scholar 

Zavadskas EK, Stanujkic D, Turskis Z, Karabasevic D. An intuitionistic extension of the simple WISP method. Entropy 2022b;24(2):218. https://doi.org/10.3390/e24020218.

Zhang C, Chen C, Streimikiene D, Balezentis T. Intuitionistic fuzzy MULTIMOORA approach for multi-criteria assessment of the energy storage technologies. Appl Soft Comput. 2019;79:410–23.

Article