American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Guideline on management of the developing dentition and occlusion in pediatric dentistry. Reference manual V 41/No 6, 19/20. 2019–2020.

Abdelkafy H, Eldehna AM, Salem NA. Canal transportation and centring ratio of paediatric vs regular files in primary teeth. Int Dent J. 2023;73(3):423–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2022.09.003.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Agarwal V, Ashwin D, Bhatia HM. Comparative evaluation of Kedo-S paediatric rotary files versus manual filing in root canal preparation of primary teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2018;19(6):355–66.

Google Scholar 

Al-Wesabi AA, El Motayam K, Alsamad AMA, Abdelgawad F. Clinical and radiographic success following pulpectomy of primary molars with rotary instrumentation versus manual instrumentation: a 12-month randomized clinical trial. Braz Dent Sci. 2025;28(1): e4538. https://doi.org/10.4322/bds.2025.e4538.

Google Scholar 

Arduim ADS, Gonçalves DP, Casagrande L, Lenzi TL. Is lentulospiral the best option for root canal filling of endodontically treated primary teeth? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2021;22(4):537–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-021-00615-4. (Epub 2021 Mar 24 PMID: 33763823).

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Asif A, Jeevanandan G, Priya V, Vishnu, El-Sherbiny M, Alnamly J, Mohamed N, Alsaleebi N, Ibrahim A. Comparison of quality of obturation, instrumentation time and post-operative pain in the primary mandibular molar teeth using three different manual instrumentation system—a randomized clinical trial. J Int Dent Med Res. 2023;16:1462–8.

Google Scholar 

Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2004;328:1490.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Babu KL, Kavyashree G, Doddamani GM. Determination of clinical efficiency of pediatric rotary file systems for root canal preparation in primary molars—a comparative study. Saudi J Oral Sci. 2022;9:32–40.

Google Scholar 

Barasuol JC, Santos PS, Moccelini BS, Magno MB, Bolan M, Martins-Júnior PA, Maia LC, Cardoso M. Association between dental pain and oral health-related quality of life in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2020;48(4):257–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12535.

Google Scholar 

Bohidar S, Goswami P, Arya A, Singh S, Samir PV, Bhargava T. An in vivo evaluation of postoperative pain after root canal instrumentation using manual K-files and Kedo-S rotary files in primary molars. J Pharm Bioall Sci. 2024;16:S136–9.

Google Scholar 

Carvalho MC, et al. Effectiveness of XP-endo finisher in the reduction of bacterial load in oval-shaped root canals. Endod Ther. 2019;33(21):1–8.

Google Scholar 

Chinn S. A simple method for converting an odds ratio to effect size for use in meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2000;19(22):3127–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0258(20001130)19:22%3c3127::aid-sim784%3e3.0.co;2-m.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cleghorn B, Boorberg N, Christie W. Primary human teeth and their root canal systems. Endod Top Halifax. 2012;23(1):6–33.

Google Scholar 

Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associ-ates; 1988.

Google Scholar 

Dash AK, Farista S, Dash A, Bendre A, Farista S. Comparison of three diferent sealer placement techniques: an in vitro confocal laser microscopic study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2017;8(2):310–4.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

De Deus G. Root canal preparation of primary teeth: a review. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2009;10(2):51–5.

Google Scholar 

Divya S, et al. Comparison of quality of obturation and post-operative pain using manual vs rotary files in primary teeth—a randomised clinical trial. Indian J Dent Res Chennai. 2020;30(6):905–8.

Google Scholar 

Durairaj B, Prathima GS, Kavitha M, Gem E, Ramassamy E. Clinical efficacy of kedo S square files versus manual k files in root canal preparation of deciduous molars: a randomised clinical trial. J Clin Diagn Res. 2023. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/65065.18656.

Google Scholar 

Garrocho-Rangel A, Jalomo-Ávila C, Rosales-Berber MÁ, Pozos-Guillén A. Lesion sterilization tissue repair (LSTR) approach of non-vital primary molars with a chloramphenicol-tetracycline-ZOE antibiotic paste: a scoping review. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021;45(6):369–75.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ghadge S, et al. Clinical evaluation and comparison of obturation quality using pediatric rotary file, rotary endodontic file and h file in root canal of primary molars: a double blinded randomized controlled trial. Int J Res Rep Dent. 2020;3(4):12–9.

Google Scholar 

Girish Babu KL, Hebbar KG. Evaluation of the combined effect of type of instrumentation systems and obturating materials on the outcome of pulpectomized primary molars—A comparative randomized clinical trial. Pediatr Dent J. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdj.2024.05.002.

Google Scholar 

Girish Babu KL, Kavyashree G. Determination of correlation between the quality of obturation and postoperative pain following root canal preparation with rotary and manual file systems in the primary molars—A comparative randomized clinical trial. Pediatr Dent J. 2021;32(1):16–25.

Google Scholar 

Goerig AC, Camp JH. Root canal treatment in primary-teeth: a review. Pediatr Dent J. 1982;5(1):33–7.

Google Scholar 

Govindaraju L, Jeevanandan G, Emg S. Knowledge and practice of rotary instrumentation in primary teeth among Indian dentists: a questionnaire survey. J Int Oral Health Chennai. 2017;9(2):45–8.

Google Scholar 

Govindaraju L, Jeevanandan G, Subramanian EMG, Vishawanathaiah S. Assessment of quality of obturation, instrumentation time and intensity of pain with pediatric rotary file (Kedo-S) in primary anterior teeth: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2018;11(6):462–7.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Habib A, Hegazi E, Mahfouz S. Evaluation of apically extruded debris and cleaning efficiency of the pediatric rotary file system and the manual nickel-titanium file system. Cureus. 2023;15(3): e36603. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.36603.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hadwa SM, Ghouraba RF, Kabbash IA, et al. Assessment of clinical and radiographic efficiency of manual and pediatric rotary file systems in primary root canal preparation: a randomized controlled clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23:687. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03393-1.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.3 (updated February 2022). Hoboken: Cochrane; 2022.

Google Scholar 

Hülsmann M, Peters OA, Dummer PM. Mechanical preparation of root canals: shaping goals, techniques and means. Endod Top. 2005;10(1):30–76.

Google Scholar 

Jeevanandan G, Govindaraju L. Clinical comparison of Kedo-S paediatric rotary files vs manual instrumentation for root canal preparation in primary molars: a double blinded randomised clinical trial. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent Chennai. 2018;19(4):1–6.

Google Scholar 

Jeevanandan G, Thomas E. Volumetric analysis of hand, reciprocating and rotary instrumentation techniques in primary molars using spiral computed tomography: An in vitro comparative study. Eur J Dent. 2018;12(1):21–6.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Jeevanandan G, Govindaraju L, Subramanian EMG, et al. Comparative evaluation of quality of obturation and its effect on postoperative pain between pediatric hand and rotary files: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021;14(1):88–96.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Juliet S, et al. comparison between three rotary files on quality of obturation and instrumentation time in primary teeth—a double blinded randomized controlled trial. J Orofac Sci Chennai. 2020;12(1):30–4.

CAS  Google Scholar 

Kahn FH, Rosenberg PA, Schertzer L, Korthals G, Nguyen P. An in-vitro evaluation of sealer placement methods. Int Endod J. 1997;30(3):181–6.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Karapinar-kazandağ M, Baseren M, Erbasar RC. An in vitro comparison of three different instrumentation techniques in primary teeth. Eur J Dent. 2018;12(3):404–10.

Google Scholar 

Kedo-S JG. pediatric rotary files for root canal preparation in primary teeth—case report. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11:ZR03–5.

Google Scholar 

Kumar D, Ravindran V. Comparison of quality of obturation and instrumentation time using manual hand-k files and rotary kedo-S square files for pulpectomy in primary molars: a double blinded randomised controlled trial. J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2023;30(10):46–53. https://doi.org/10.47750/jptcp.2023.30.10.008.

Google Scholar 

Kumar A, Bansal K, Gupta S, Taneja S. Comparison of cleaning efficacy of hand K-files, rotary ProTaper, and self-adjusting file systems in primary teeth: a scanning electron microscopic study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2016;34(3):227–34. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.186759. (PMID: 27382548).

Google Scholar 

Kummer TR, Calvo MC, Cordeiro MM, de Sousa VR, de Carvalho Rocha MJ. Ex vivo study of manual and rotary instrumentation techniques in human primary teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;105(4):e84-92.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lakshamananan L, Jeevanandan G. Evaluation Of quality of obturation and instrumentation time using kedo-S square file, h file and k file in primary molars-a randomized controlled trial. Int J Pharmaceu Res. 2021;12:3507–14.

Google Scholar 

Lakshmanan L, Ramakrishnan M, Jeevanandan G. Comparison of obturation quality, instrumentation time and post-operative pain using manual K-files and pediatric rotary files in primary molars a double blinded randomised clinical trial. Braz Dent Sci. 2023;26: e3497. https://doi.org/10.4322/bds.2023.e3497.

Google Scholar 

Mahajan N, Bansal A. Various obturation methods used in deciduous teeth. Int J Med Dent Sci. 2015;4(1):708–13.

Google Scholar 

Manchada P, Sardana D, Yiu CKY. Postoperative pain and its impact on children’s behavior during future dental appointments. J Pediatr Dent. 2019;41(2):87–92.

Google Scholar 

Moudgalya MS, Tyagi P, Tiwari S, Tiwari T, Umarekar P, Shrivastava S. To Compare and evaluate rotary and manual techniques in biomechanical preparation of primary molars to know their effects in terms of cleaning and shaping efficacy. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024;17(8):864–70. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2949.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Nair M, Jeevanandan G, Vignesh R, Subramanian EMG. Comparative evaluation of post-operative pain after pulpectomy with K-files, Kedo-S files and MTwo files in deciduous molars—a randomized clinical trial. B Dent Sci. 2018;21(4):411–7.

Google Scholar 

Page MJ, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic review. BMJ. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Panchal V, Jeevanandan G, Subramanian EM. Comparison of instrumentation time and obturation quality between hand K-file, H-files, and rotary Kedo-S in root canal treatment of primary teeth: a randomized controlled trial. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2019;37:75–9.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Patel FC, Patel MC, Bhatt RK, Joshi KR. Avaliação comparativa da qualidade da obturação e do tempo de instrumentação utilizando diferentes sistemas de limas em molares decíduos: um ensaio clínico randomizado. Avanços Em Biologia Humana. 2023;13(2):211–7.