American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Pulp therapy for primary and immature permanent teeth. In: The Reference Manual of Pediatric Dentistry. Chicago: American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. 2021. p. 399–407.

Akhlaghi NM, Khalilak Z, Mohajeri LB, Sheikholeslami M, Saedi S. Comparison of Canal Preparation Pattern of K3 and ProTaper Rotary Files in Curved Resin Blocks. Iran Endod J. 2008;3(2):11.

Google Scholar 

Anbu R, Nandini S, Velmurugan N. Volumetric analysis of root fillings using spiral computed tomography: An in vitro study. Int Endod J. 2010;43(1):64–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01638.x.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Arduim AS, Gonçalves DP, Casagrande L, Lenzi TL. Is lentulospiral the best option for root canal filling of endodontically treated primary teeth? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Arch Paediatr Dentistry. 2021;22(4):537–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40368-021-00615-4.

Article  Google Scholar 

Asokan S, Sooriaprakas C, Raghu V, Bairavi R. Volumetric analysis of root canal fillings in primary teeth using spiral computed tomography: an in vitro study. J Dent Child. 2012;79(2):46–8.

Google Scholar 

Azim AA, Piasecki L, da Silva Neto UX, Cruz ATG, Azim KA. XP Shaper, A novel adaptive core rotary instrument: micro–computed tomographic analysis of its shaping abilities. J Endod. 2017;43(9):1532–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.04.022.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Barasuol JC, Alcalde MP, Bortoluzzi EA, Duarte MAH, Cardoso M, Bolan M. Shaping ability of hand, rotary and reciprocating files in primary teeth: a micro-CT study in vitro. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2021;22(2):195–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40368-020-00530-0.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Barr ES, Kleier DJ, Barr NV. Use of nickel-titanium rotary files for root canal preparation in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2000;21(7):453–4.

Google Scholar 

Belladonna FG, de Guimarães TM, Silva EJNL, de Vieira EO, Lee JK, de Rodrigues EA, Souza EM, Versiani MA. Exploring the Efficacy of 6 Preparation Systems for Achieving Minimal Root Canal Transportation: A Micro-CT Investigation. J Endod. 2023;49(12):1722–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOEN.2023.09.004.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Caviedes-Bucheli J, Rios-Osorio N, Usme D, Jimenez C, Pinzon A, Rincón J, Azuero-Holguin MM, Zubizarreta-Macho A, Gomez-Sosa JF, Munoz HR. Three-dimensional analysis of the root canal preparation with Reciproc Blue®, WaveOne Gold® and XP EndoShaper®: a new method in vivo. BMC Oral Health. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12903-021-01450-1.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Cerqueira NM, Louzada VG, Silva-Sousa YTC, Raucci-Neto W, Leoni GB. Effect of canal preparation with XP-endo Shaper and ProTaper Next on root canal geometry and dentin thickness of mandibular premolars with radicular grooves and two canals: a micro-CT study. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25(9):5505–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00784-021-03858-Z.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Coll JA, Dhar V, Vargas K, Chen CY, Crystal YO, AlShamali S, Marghalani AA. Use of non-vital pulp therapies in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2020;42(5):337–49.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dantas WCF, Marceliano-Alves MFV, Marceliano EFV, Marques EF, De Carvalho Coutinho TM, Alves FRF, De MAS, Pelegrine RA, Lopes RT, Bueno CEDS. Microtomographic Assessment of the Shaping Ability of the Hyflex CM and XP-endo Shaper Systems in Curved Root Canals. Eur J Dent. 2022;17(3):699. https://doi.org/10.1055/S-0042-1750694.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

De-Deus G, Belladonna FG, Silva EJNL, Marins JR, Souza EM, Perez R, Lopes RT, Versiani MA, Paciornik S, Neves AA. Micro-CT evaluation of non-instrumented canal areas with different enlargements performed by NiTi Systems. Braz Dent J. 2015;26(6):624–9. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201300116.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

De-Deus G, Silva EJNL, Vieira VTL, Belladonna FG, Elias CN, Plotino G, Grande NM. Blue thermomechanical treatment optimizes fatigue resistance and flexibility of the reciproc files. J Endod. 2017;43(3):462–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOEN.2016.10.039.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

De-Deus G, Simões-Carvalho M, Belladonna FG, Cavalcante DM, Portugal LS, Prado CG, Souza EM, Lopes RT, Silva EJNL. Arrowhead design ultrasonic tip as a supplementary tool for canal debridement. Int Endod J. 2020;53(3):410–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/IEJ.13236.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gavini G, de Santos M, Caldeira CL, de Machado MEL, Freire LG, Iglecias EF, Peters OA, de Candeiro GTM. Nickel-titanium instruments in endodontics: a concise review of the state of the art. Braz Oral Res. 2018;32(1):44–65. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2018.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hidalgo LRDC, Silva LABD, Leoni GB, Mazzi-Chaves JF, Carvalho EEDS, Consolaro A, Sousa-Neto MD. Mechanical preparation showed superior shaping ability than manual technique in primary molars-a micro-computed tomography study. Braz Dent J. 2017;28(4):453–60. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201601552.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Katge F, Patil D, Poojari M, Pimpale J, Shitoot A, Rusawat B. Comparison of instrumentation time and cleaning efficacy of manual instrumentation, rotary systems and reciprocating systems in primary teeth: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2014;32(4):311–6. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.140957.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kummer TR, Calvo MC, Cordeiro MMR, de Sousa VR, de Carvalho Rocha MJ. Ex vivo study of manual and rotary instrumentation techniques in human primary teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol. 2008;105(4):e84–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRIPLEO.2007.12.008.

Article  Google Scholar 

Lima CO, Barbosa AFA, Ferreira CM, Ferretti MA, Aguiar FHB, Lopes RT, Fidel SR, Silva EJNL. Influence of ultraconservative access cavities on instrumentation efficacy with XP-endo Shaper and Reciproc, filling ability and load capacity of mandibular molars subjected to thermomechanical cycling. Int Endod J. 2021;54(8):1383–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/IEJ.13525.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Musale P, Jain K, Kothare S. Comparative assessment of dentin removal following hand and rotary instrumentation in primary molars using cone-beam computed tomography. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2029;37(1):80–6. https://doi.org/10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_210_18.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ochoa-Romero T, Mendez-Gonzalez V, Flores-Reyes H, Pozos-Guillen A. Comparison between rotary and manual techniques on duration of instrumentation and obturation times in primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011;35(4):359–64. https://doi.org/10.17796/JCPD.35.4.8K013K21T39245N8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pinheiro SL, Araujo G, Bincelli I, Cunha R, Bueno C. Evaluation of cleaning capacity and instrumentation time of manual, hybrid and rotary instrumentation techniques in primary molars. Int Endod J. 2012;45(4):379–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1365-2591.2011.01987.X.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Roane JB, Sabala CL, Duncanson MG. The “balanced force” concept for instrumentation of curved canals. J Endod. 1985;11(5):203–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(85)80061-3.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Santos PS, de Oliveira NM, Ramos T, Dornellas AP, de Rocha AO, Vitali FC, Moccelini BS, Rigo DCA, de Marques RPS, Pontes LRA, et al. Efficacy of the non-instrumentation endodontic treatment with CTZ paste in primary molars: Protocol of a multicenter randomized clinical trial with two years of follow-up. Res Soc Develop. 2022;11(16):e111111637140. https://doi.org/10.33448/RSD-V11I16.37140.

Article  Google Scholar 

Schäfer E, Schulz-Bongert U, Tulus G. Comparison of hand stainless steel and nickel titanium rotary instrumentation: a clinical study. J Endod. 2004;30(6):432–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200406000-00014.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Silva EJNL, Lima CO, Barbosa AFA, Moreira T, Souza EM, De-Deus G, Versiani MA. Influence of access cavity preparation on the dentine thickness of mesial canals of mandibular molars prepared with reciprocating instruments. Int Endod J. 2022;55(1):113–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/IEJ.13642.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Silva EJNL, Ajuz NC, Martins JNR, Antunes BR, Lima CO, Vieira VTL, Braz-Fernandes FM, Versiani MA. Multimethod analysis of three rotary instruments produced by electric discharge machining technology. Int Endod J. 2023;56(6):775–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/IEJ.13915.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Silva EJNL, Peña-Bengoa F, Ajuz NC, Vieira VTL, Martins JNR, Marques D, Pinto R, Rito Pereira M, Braz-Fernandes FM, Versiani MA. Multimethod analysis of large- and low-tapered single file reciprocating instruments: design, metallurgy, mechanical performance, and irrigation flow. Int Endod J. 2024;57(5):601–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/IEJ.14047.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Singh R, Chaudhary S, Manuja N, Chaitra TR, Sinha AA. Evaluation of different root canal obturation methods in primary teeth using cone beam computerized tomography. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015;39(5):462–9. https://doi.org/10.17796/1053-4628-39.5.462.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Siqueira Junior JF, Rôças IN, Marceliano-Alves MF, Pérez AR, Ricucci D. Unprepared root canal surface areas: causes, clinical implications, and therapeutic strategies. Braz Oral Res. 2018;32:e65. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2018.VOL32.0065.

Article