Lamperti M, Romero CS, Guarracino F, Cammarota G, Vetrugno L, Tufegdzic B, Lozsan F, Macias Frias JJ, Duma A, Bock M, Ruetzler K, Mulero S, Reuter DA, La Via L, Rauch S, Sorbello M, Afshari A. Preoperative assessment of adults undergoing elective noncardiac surgery: updated guidelines from the European society of anaesthesiology and intensive care. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2025;42(1):1–35. Epub 2024 Nov 2. PMID: 39492705.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sansone P, Giaccari LG, Bonomo A, Gargano F, Aurilio C, Coppolino F, Passavanti MB, Pota V, Pace MC. Comparison of McGrath videolaryngoscope versus macintosh laryngoscope in tracheal intubation: an updated systematic review. J Clin Med. 2023;12(19):6168. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12196168. PMID: 37834812; PMCID: PMC10573091.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Szarpak L, Truszewski Z, Czyzewski L, Gaszynski T, Rodríguez-Núñez A. A comparison of the McGrath-MAC and macintosh laryngoscopes for child tracheal intubation during resuscitation by paramedics. A randomized, crossover, manikin study. Am J Emerg Med. 2016;34(8):1338–41. Epub 2015 Nov 23. PMID: 26712571.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Korkut S, Szarpak L, Evrin T, Smereka J, Katipoğlu B, Gorczyca D. Comparison of the McGrath MAC EMS videolaryngoscope with a conventional laryngoscope for standard and difficult airway intubation: A randomized, Cross-over, simulation trial. Eurasian J Emerg Med. 2019;18(4):211–7. https://doi.org/10.4274/eajem.galenos.2019.02360.

Article  Google Scholar 

Komatsu R, Kamata K, Sessler DI, Ozaki M. A comparison of the airway scope and McCoy laryngoscope in patients with simulated restricted neck mobility. Anaesthesia. 2010;65(6):564–8. Epub 2010 Apr 12. PMID: 20412151.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hansel J, Rogers AM, Lewis SR, Cook TM, Smith AF. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis update. Br J Anaesth. 2022;129(4):612–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2022.05.027. Epub 2022 Jul 9. PMID: 35820934; PMCID: PMC9575044.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

IMI Corporation. AceScope. IMI corporation, www.imimed.co.jp/medical/product/vent_related/acescope/

Jo WY, Choi JH, Kim J, Shin KW, Choi S, Park HP, Oh H. Cervical spine motion during videolaryngoscopic intubation using a Macintosh-style blade with and without the anterior piece of a cervical collar: a randomized controlled trial. Can J Anaesth. 2024 Oct 14. English. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-024-02849-4. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 39402414.

Wakabayashi R, Shiko Y, Kodaira T, Shiroshita Y, Otsuka H, Baba K, Hishinuma N. Efficacy of stylet angulation at the holding position during tracheal intubation with a videolaryngoscope: a randomized controlled trial. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):20713. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00115-x. PMID: 34671041; PMCID: PMC8528812.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kim YJ, Hur C, Yoon HK, Lee HC, Park HP, Oh H. Effects of external laryngeal　manipulation on cervical spine motion during videolaryngoscopic intubation under　manual In-Line stabilization: A randomized crossover trial. J Clin Med. 2021 Jun　30;10(13):2931. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132931. PMID: 34208825; PMCID: PMC8268206.

Geraghty LE, Dunne EA, Ní Chathasaigh CM, Vellinga A, Adams NC, O’Currain EM, McCarthy LK, O’Donnell CPF. Video versus direct laryngoscopy for urgent intubation of newborn infants. N Engl J Med. 2024;390(20):1885–94. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2402785. Epub 2024 May 5. PMID: 38709215.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Aghamohammadi H, Massoudi N, Fathi M, Jaffari A, Gharaei B, Moshki A. Intubation learning curve: comparison between video and direct laryngoscopy by inexperienced students. J Med Life. 2015;8(Spec Iss 4):150–3. PMID: 28316722; PMCID: PMC5319281.

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Nalubola S, Jin E, Drugge ED, Weber G, Abramowicz AE. Video versus direct laryngoscopy in novice intubators: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus. 2022;14(9):e29578. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.29578. PMID: 36312614; PMCID: PMC9595268.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kaplan HS, Üney İH. The effects of McGrath® MAC video laryngoscope-assisted education on the endotracheal intubation practices of undergraduate anesthesia medicine students: A randomized, controlled attempt. East J Med. 2021;26(1):80–5. https://doi.org/10.5505/ejm.2021.75768.

Article  Google Scholar 

Adly A, Youssef TA, El-Begermy MM, Younis HM. Timing of tracheostomy in patients with prolonged endotracheal intubation: a systematic review. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;275(3):679–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4838-7. Epub 2017 Dec 19. PMID: 29255970.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Roh GU, Kwak HJ, Lee KC, Lee SY, Kim JY. Randomized comparison of McGrath MAC　videolaryngoscope, Pentax Airway Scope, and Macintosh direct laryngoscope for　nasotracheal intubation in patients with manual in-line stabilization. Can J Anaesth. 2019;66(10):1213–1220. English. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-019-01409-5.Epub 2019 May 29. PMID: 31144258.

Oh JY, Lee JH, Kim YY, Baek SM, Jung DW, Park JH. A comparative study of glottis visualization according to the method of lifting the epiglottis in video laryngoscopy: indirect and direct lifting methods. Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2021;16(2):196–200. https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.20073. Epub 2021 Apr 8. PMID: 33845551; PMCID: PMC8107246.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Komasawa N, Hattori K, Mihara R, Minami T. Direct laryngoscopy training is important for videolaryngoscopy skill acquisition. Br J Anaesth. 2017;118(2):269–70. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aew458.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Guo N, Wen X, Wang X, Yang J, Zhou H, Guo J, Su Y, Zhang T. Comparison of outcomes between video laryngoscopy and flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy for endotracheal intubation in adults with cervical neck immobilization: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(11):e0313280. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0313280. PMID: 39546549; PMCID: PMC11567517.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Belze O, Coppere Z, Ouattara J, Thion LA, Paqueron X, Devys JM, Ma S, Kennel T, Fischler M, Le Guen M. Influence of videolaryngoscopy using McGrath Mac on the need for a helper to perform intubation during general anaesthesia: a multicentre randomised video-no-video trial. BMJ Open. 2022;12(1):e049275. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049275. PMID: 34980609; PMCID: PMC8724720.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Goto T, Koyama Y, Kondo T, Tsugawa Y, Hasegawa K. A comparison of the force applied on oral structures during intubation attempts between the Pentax-AWS airwayscope and the macintosh laryngoscope: a high-fidelity simulator-based study. BMJ Open. 2014;4(10):e006416. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006416. PMID: 25296656; PMCID: PMC4194748.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kotera A, Irie H, Iwashita S, Taniguchi J, Kasaoka S, Kinoshita Y. Comparison of the conventional Macintosh laryngoscope, the Pentax Airwayscope, and the McGrath MAC video laryngoscope under restricted cervical motion: a manikin study. Acute Med Surg., Asai T, Enomoto Y, Okuda Y. Airway scope for difficult intubation. Anaesthesia 2007; 62:199.

Teoh WH, Saxena S, Shah MK, Sia AT. Comparison of three videolaryngoscopes: pentax airway scope, C-MAC, glidescope vs the macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia. 2010;65(11):1126–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365. Epub 2010 Sep 30. PMID: 20883502.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kim JK, Kim JA, Kim CS, Ahn HJ, Yang MK, Choi SJ. Comparison of tracheal intubation with the airway scope or Clarus video system in patients with cervical collars. Anaesthesia. 2011;66(8):694–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06762.x. Epub 2011 May 13. PMID: 21564045.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tsai P, Chen B. Hemodynamic responses to endotracheal intubation comparing the Airway Scope®, Glidescope®, and Macintosh laryngoscopes. Internet J Anesthesiol. 2009;24(2).

Kim JG, Ahn C, Kim W, Lim TH, Jang BH, Cho Y, Shin H, Lee H, Lee J, Choi KS, Na MK, Kwon SM. Comparison of video laryngoscopy with direct laryngoscopy for intubation success in critically ill patients: a systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023;10:1193514. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1193514. PMID: 37358992; PMCID: PMC10289197.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hirabayashi Y. Airway Scope: initial clinical experience with novice personnel. Can J Anaesth. 2007;54(2):160-1. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03022021. Erratum in: Can J Anaesth. 2007;54(5):406. PMID: 17272261.

Madziala M, Smereka J, Dabrowski M, Leung S, Ruetzler K, Szarpak L. A comparison of McGrath MAC® and standard direct laryngoscopy in simulated immobilized cervical spine pediatric intubation: a manikin study. Eur J Pediatr. 2017;176(6):779–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-017-2909-9. Epub 2017 Apr 21. PMID: 28429117; PMCID: PMC5432598.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kleine-Brueggeney M, Greif R, Schoettker P, Savoldelli GL, Nabecker S, Theiler LG. Evaluation of six videolaryngoscopes in 720 patients with a simulated difficult airway: a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2016;116(5):670-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aew058. PMID: 27106971.

Tan Y, Loganathan N, Thinn KK, Liu EHC, Loh NW. Dental injury in anaesthesia: a tertiary hospital’s experience. BMC Anesthesiol. 2018;18(1):108. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-018-0569-6. PMID: 30111288; PMCID: PMC6094905.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Russotto V, Lascarrou JB, Tassistro E, Parotto M, Antolini L, Bauer P, Szułdrzyński K, Camporota L, Putensen C, Pelosi P, Sorbello M, Higgs A, Greif R, Grasselli G, Valsecchi MG, Fumagalli R, Foti G, Caironi P, Bellani G, Laffey JG, Myatra SN, INTUBE Study Investigators. Efficacy and adverse events profile of videolaryngoscopy in critically ill patients: subanalysis of the INTUBE study. Br J Anaesth. 2023;131(3):607–16. Epub 2023 May 17. PMID: 37208282.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Aoi Y, Inagawa G, Nakamura K, Sato H, Kariya T, Goto T. Airway scope versus　macintosh laryngoscope in patients with simulated limitation of neck movements. J Trauma. 2010;69(4):838– 42. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181c4529e. PMID: 20179653.

Murakami Y, Ueki R, Niki M, Hirose M, Shimode N. Three-day tracheal intubation manikin training for novice Doctors using macintosh laryngoscope, McGRATH MAC videolaryngoscope and pentax airwayscope. Med (Baltim). 2021;100(4):e23886. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023886. PMID: 33530183; PMCID: PMC7850776.

Article  Google Scholar 

Malik MA, Maharaj CH, Harte BH, Laffey JG. Comparison of Macintosh, Truview EVO2, glidescope, and airwayscope laryngoscope use in patients with cervical spine immobilization. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101(5):723–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aen231. Epub 2008 Sep 9. PMID: 18784069.

Article  CAS  PubMed