Bours MJL (2020) A nontechnical explanation of the counterfactual definition of confounding. J Clin Epidemiol 121:91–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.01.021

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Imbens GW, Wooldridge JM (2009) Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. J Econ Lit 47(1):5–86. https://doi.org/10.1257/JEL.47.1.5

Article  Google Scholar 

Widding-Havneraas T, Zachrisson HD (2022) A gentle introduction to instrumental variables. J Clin Epidemiol 149:203–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.06.022

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Davey Smith G, Ebrahim S (2003) ‘Mendelian randomization’: can genetic epidemiology contribute to understanding environmental determinants of disease? Int J Epidemiol 32(1):1–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyg070

Article  Google Scholar 

Archimbaud E, Thomas X, Michallet M et al (1994) Prospective genetically randomized comparison between intensive postinduction chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation in adults with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 12(2):262–267. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1994.12.2.262

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Buckley JD, Chard RL, Baehner RL et al (1989) Improvement in outcome for children with acute nonlymphocytic leukemia. A report from the Childrens Cancer Study Group. Cancer 63(8):1457–1465. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19890415)63:8<1457::AID-CNCR2820630802>3.0.CO;2-J

Gray R, Wheatley K (1991) How to avoid bias when comparing bone marrow transplantation with chemotherapy. Bone Marrow Transplant 7:9–12

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fallon UB, Ben-Shlomo Y, Elwood P, Ubbink JB, Davey Smith G (2001) Homocysteine and coronary heart disease—Author’s reply. Heart 85(2):153

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sanderson E, Glymour MM, Holmes MV et al (2022) Mendelian randomization. Nat Rev Methods Primers 2(1):6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-021-00092-5

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Davey Smith G (2012) Epigenesis for epidemiologists: does evo-devo have implications for population health research and practice? Int J Epidemiol 41(1):236–247. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dys016

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Boehm FJ, Zhou X (2022) Statistical methods for Mendelian randomization in genome-wide association studies: a review. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 20:2338–2351. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CSBJ.2022.05.015

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Swerdlow DI, Kuchenbaecker KB, Shah S et al (2016) Selecting instruments for Mendelian randomization in the wake of genome-wide association studies. Int J Epidemiol 45(5):1600. https://doi.org/10.1093/IJE/DYW088

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hemani G, Zheng J, Elsworth B et al (2018) The MR-Base platform supports systematic causal inference across the human phenome. Elife 7:e34408. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34408

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Yavorska OO, Burgess S (2017) MendelianRandomization: an R package for performing Mendelian randomization analyses using summarized data. Int J Epidemiol 46(6):1734–1739. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyx034

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Pierce BL, Burgess S (2013) Efficient design for Mendelian randomization studies: subsample and 2-sample instrumental variable estimators. Am J Epidemiol 178(7):1177–1184. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwt084

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Skrivankova VW, Richmond RC, Woolf BAR et al (2021) Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology using Mendelian randomization: the STROBE-MR statement. JAMA 326(16):1614–1621. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.18236

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ebrahim S, Davey Smith G (2008) Mendelian randomization: can genetic epidemiology help redress the failures of observational epidemiology? Hum Genet 123(1):15–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-007-0448-6

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lawlor DA, Tilling K, Davey Smith G (2016) Triangulation in aetiological epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol 45(6):1866–1886. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw314

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gutierrez S, Glymour MM, Smith GD (2025) Evidence triangulation in health research. Eur J Epidemiol https://doi.org/10.1007/S10654-024-01194-6

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hemani G, Bowden J, Haycock P et al (2017) Automating Mendelian randomization through machine learning to construct a putative causal map of the human phenome. bioRxiv 173682. https://doi.org/10.1101/173682

Liu Y, Elsworth B, Erola P et al (2021) EpiGraphDB: a database and data mining platform for health data science. Bioinformatics 37(9):1304–1311. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa961

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Burgess S, Thompson SG, CRP CHD Genetics Collaboration (2011) Avoiding bias from weak instruments in Mendelian randomization studies. Int J Epidemiol 40(3):755–764. https://doi.org/10.1093/IJE/DYR036

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Merino J, Tobias DK (2022) The unique challenges of studying the genetics of diet and nutrition. Nat Med 28(2):221–222. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01626-w

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hamilton FW, Hughes DA, Spiller W, Tilling K, Davey Smith G (2024) Non-linear Mendelian randomization: detection of biases using negative controls with a focus on BMI, Vitamin D and LDL cholesterol. Eur J Epidemiol 39(5):451–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-024-01113-9

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Skrivankova VW, Richmond RC, Woolf BAR et al (2021) Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology using mendelian randomisation (STROBE-MR): explanation and elaboration. BMJ 375:n2233. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n2233

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lawlor DA, Wade K, Borges MC et al (2019) A Mendelian Randomization dictionary: useful definitions and descriptions for undertaking, understanding and interpreting Mendelian Randomization studies. OSF Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/6yzs7

Davies NM, Holmes MV, Davey Smith G (2018) Reading Mendelian randomisation studies: a guide, glossary, and checklist for clinicians. BMJ 362:k601. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k601

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Burgess S, Davey Smith G, Davies NM et al (2023) Guidelines for performing Mendelian randomization investigations: update for summer 2023. Wellcome Open Res 4(186). https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15555.3

Stender S, Gellert-Kristensen H, Smith GD (2024) Reclaiming mendelian randomization from the deluge of papers and misleading findings. Lipids Health Dis 23(1):286. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-024-02284-w

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kjaergaard AD, Smith GD, Stewart P (2023) Mendelian randomization studies in endocrinology: raising the quality bar for submissions and publications in the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 109(1):1–3. https://doi.org/10.1210/CLINEM/DGAD569

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar